Enhanced mortality risk prediction with a focus on high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 1,208,137 procedures in the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry).

OBJECTIVES This study sought to update and validate a contemporary model for inpatient mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including variables indicating high clinical risk. BACKGROUND Recently, new variables were added to the CathPCI Registry data collection form. This modification allowed us to better characterize the risk of death, including recent cardiac arrest and duration of cardiogenic shock. METHODS Data from 1,208,137 PCI procedures performed between July 2009 and June 2011 at 1,252 CathPCI Registry sites were used to develop both a "full" and pre-catheterization PCI in-hospital mortality risk model using logistic regression. To support prospective implementation, a simplified bedside risk score was derived from the pre-catheterization risk model. Model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration metrics in a separate split sample. RESULTS In-hospital mortality was 1.4%, ranging from 0.2% among elective cases (45.1% of total cases) to 65.9% among patients with shock and recent cardiac arrest (0.2% of total cases). Cardiogenic shock and procedure urgency were the most predictive of inpatient mortality, whereas the presence of a chronic total occlusion, subacute stent thrombosis, and left main lesion location were significant angiographic predictors. The full, pre-catheterization, and bedside risk prediction models performed well in the overall validation sample (C-indexes 0.930, 0.928, 0.925, respectively) and among pre-specified patient subgroups. The model was well calibrated across the risk spectrum, although slightly overestimating risk in the highest risk patients. CONCLUSIONS Clinical acuity is a strong predictor of PCI procedural mortality. With inclusion of variables that further characterize clinical stability, the updated CathPCI Registry mortality models remain well-calibrated across the spectrum of PCI risk.

[1]  F. Welt,et al.  The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary intervention. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Robert M Califf,et al.  Integrating quality into the cycle of therapeutic development. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  J. Spertus,et al.  Influence of Frailty and Health Status on Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Revascularization , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[4]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  A randomized evaluation of early revascularization to treat shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. The (Swiss) Multicenter Trial of Angioplasty for Shock-(S)MASH. , 1999, European heart journal.

[5]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: The Framingham Study risk score functions , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  S. Normand,et al.  Improvement in mortality risk prediction after percutaneous coronary intervention through the addition of a "compassionate use" variable to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI dataset: a study from the Massachusetts Angioplasty Registry. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  H. White,et al.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Judith S. Hochman,et al.  Cardiogenic Shock: Current Concepts and Improving Outcomes , 2008, Circulation.

[9]  B. Rutherford,et al.  Procedural outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Elizabeth R DeLong,et al.  Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  W. Zareba,et al.  The influence of public reporting of outcome data on medical decision making by physicians. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  H V Anderson,et al.  The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry™ (ACC-NCDR™): building a national clinical data repository , 2001 .

[13]  H. White,et al.  Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, JAMA.

[14]  L. Klein,et al.  Mortality after emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction and usefulness of a mortality prediction model. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  B. Rutherford,et al.  Procedural outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. , 2001, Indian heart journal.