Voluntary Disclosure in the Annual Reports of New Zealand Companies

New Zealand is currently experiencing a liberal and competitive economic environment which has led to a greater investment interest in corporate securities. Likewise, New Zealand firms are also developing strategies to attract investors, for example, through voluntary disclosure of information. Therefore, the level of information voluntarily disclosed by New Zealand companies is of interest to prospective investors. The purpose of this study is to examine empirically the relationship between five firm-specific characteristics and the general level of accounting information voluntarily disclosed by companies listed on New Zealand Stock Exchange (NZSE). In this study the a priori expectations are based on agency theory. The five firm-specific characteristics examined are: firm size, leverage, assets-in-place, type of auditor, and foreign listing status. The results obtained from cross-sectional regression show that firm size, foreign listing status and leverage are significantly related to the extent of voluntary disclosure. In contrast assets-in-place and type of auditor are not significant explanatory variables. A study of this type would be of particular relevance to accounting policy makers because, inter alia, it helps them in (a) understanding corporate disclosure behaviour, (b) explaining why firms adopt certain disclosure strategies, and (c) developing a coherent and acceptable set of mandatory disclosure requirements.

[1]  E. Blocher.  Assessment of Prior Distributions: The Effect on Required Sample Size in Bayesian Audit Sampling , 1981 .

[2]  Janet Kiholm Smith.  An Analysis of State Regulations Governing Liquor Store Licensees , 1982, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[3]  Richard D. Morris,et al.  Signalling, Agency Theory and Accounting Policy Choice , 1987 .

[4]  M. Firth.  The Impact of Size, Stock Market Listing, and Auditors on Voluntary Disclosure in Corporate Annual Reports , 1979 .

[5]  Michael Gibbins,et al.  THE MANAGEMENT OF CORPORATE FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE - OPPORTUNISM, RITUALISM, POLICIES, AND PROCESSES , 1990 .

[6]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[7]  Stephen L Taylor,et al.  DISCRETIONARY DISCLOSURE OF RESERVES BY OIL AND GAS COMPANIES: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[8]  S. Gray,et al.  Globalization of Stock Markets and Foreign Listing Requirements: Voluntary Disclosures by Continental European Companies Listed on the London Stock Exchange , 1989 .

[9]  G. McNally,et al.  Corporate Financial Reporting in New Zealand: An Analysis of User Preferences, Corporate Characteristics and Disclosure Practices for Discretionary Information , 1982 .

[10]  Y. T. Mak.  Corporate characteristics and the voluntary disclosure of forecast information: A study of New Zealand prospectuses , 1991 .

[11]  L. DeAngelo,et al.  Auditor size and audit quality , 1981 .

[12]  M. Bradbury.  The incentives for voluntary audit committee formation , 1990 .

[13]  J. Livnat,et al.  Auditor Selection: An Incentive-Signalling Approach , 1984 .

[14]  S. Saudagaran.  An Empirical Study of Selected Factors Influencing the Decision to List on Foreign Stock Exchanges , 1988 .

[15]  S. Myers.  Determinants of corporate borrowing , 1977 .

[16]  George Foster,et al.  Corporate Financial-Reporting - A Methodological Review Of Empirical-Research , 1982 .

[17]  Gary C. Biddle,et al.  The Effects of Financial Disclosure Levels on Firms' Choices among Alternative Foreign Stock Exchange Listings , 1988 .

[18]  Stephen L. Buzby.  COMPANY SIZE, LISTED VERSUS UNLISTED STOCKS, AND EXTENT OF FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE , 1975 .

[19]  Douglas J. Skinner.  WHY FIRMS VOLUNTARILY DISCLOSE BAD-NEWS , 1994 .

[20]  Discretionary Disclosures in Response to Intra-Industry Information Transfers , 1994 .

[21]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  Corporate Financial Statements, A Product of the Market and Political Processes , 1977 .

[22]  Terence Cooke,et al.  Global Surveys of Corporate Disclosure Practices and Audit Firms: A Review Essay , 1989 .

[23]  Jerold L. Zimmerman,et al.  Voluntary Corporate Disclosure: The Case of Interim Reporting , 1981 .

[24]  Russell J. Lundholm,et al.  CROSS- SECTIONAL DETERMINANTS OF ANALYST RATINGS OF CORPORATE DISCLOSURES , 1993 .

[25]  P. J. Hughes.  Signalling by direct disclosure under asymmetric information , 1986 .

[26]  Srikant M. Datar,et al.  The role of audits and audit quality in valuing new issues , 1991 .

[27]  Michael E. Bradbury,et al.  VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE OF FINANCIAL SEGMENT DATA: NEW ZEALAND EVIDENCE , 1992 .

[28]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis , 1987 .

[29]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[30]  K. Schipper.  Discussion of Voluntary Corporate Disclosure: The Case of Interim Reporting , 1981 .