E-Learning in Architecture: Professional and Lifelong Learning Prospects

E-learning in architectural and spatially related fields can be examined from two different perspectives, each having quite specific and complex implications. By discussing e-learning in architecture we inspect the scope of e-learning tools and practices within the architectural domain, the visual nature of education and professional training of architects, and the state of the art of e-learning implementations, together with their practicality and limitations. While these are the first areas that come to mind when considering e-learning in relation to architecture, there is another also very relevant and sometimes overlooked aspect: that of e-learning about architecture. In the latter, we introduce not only the professional but also the broader, non-expert public into the process of acting within, and shaping of, their spatial environments. This aspect raises burning questions regarding the communication abilities of the actors involved, holding their attention, ingraining sustainable principles and getting the messages across the invisible, but perennial expert / non-expert divide. E-learning in and about architecture not only offers opportunities for both sides to learn but also to get to know each other better. The chapter first introduces and highlights the common aspects of e-learning within the architectural domain, followed by e-learning for experts, through what we have named e-learning in architecture, describing specifics and presenting an example of one of the e-learning initiatives. It is followed by a subchapter describing aspects of e-learning about architecture and sustainable principles of space interventions for broader audience of nonexperts involved in the lifelong learning processes (LLP). Similarly, the subchapter concludes with an example of an e-learning tool in action and the reflections on the research presented. The chapter concludes with discussions of ‘lessons learned’ and ranking of new opportunities in professional and lifelong e-learning prospects in architecture and its related fields.

[1]  J. Greeno THE SITUATIVITY OF KNOWING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH , 1998 .

[2]  B. Schneirdeman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[3]  Matevz Juvancic,et al.  Interpretation Model of Urban Space Coherence , 2011, Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe).

[4]  E. Glasersfeld An Exposition of Constructivism: Why Some Like it Radical , 1991 .

[5]  T. Zupancic,et al.  TOWARDS EFFECTIVE INTERFACES FOR GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL LEARNING. Eco-spatial educational interface for pupils , 2008 .

[6]  Dominique Gauzin-Müller,et al.  Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism: Concepts, Technologies, Examples , 2002 .

[7]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  A usability study on human-computer interface for middle-aged learners , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  A. Neville,et al.  The problem-based learning tutor: Teacher? Facilitator? Evaluator? , 1999 .

[9]  A. Miyake,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking , 2005 .

[10]  Gary S. Stager,et al.  TOWARDS A PEDAGOGY OF ONLINE CONSTRUCTIONIST LEARNING , 2005 .

[11]  Andreja Istenic Starcic,et al.  The concretization of the term sustainable spa- tial development for the assessment of child and juvenile awareness , 2009 .

[12]  Michael Mullins,et al.  The Identity of Place in Virtual Design Studios , 2002 .

[13]  Michael Mullins,et al.  Efficiency and Accuracy in the Presentation of Design Ideas across Networks , 2002 .

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[15]  William R. Sherman,et al.  Understanding Virtual Reality , 2003 .

[16]  G. Ucelli,et al.  Visualisation: The Customer's Perception , 1999 .

[17]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  The FishbowlTM: Degrees of Engagement in Global Teamwork , 2006, EG-ICE.

[18]  Scott Curland Chase,et al.  ARCHI21: Architectural and Design based Education and Practice through Content & Language Integrated , 2011 .

[19]  Junghoon Moon,et al.  Web interface consistency in e-learning , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..

[20]  Andrew Roberts,et al.  The Place of E-learning in Architectural Education A Critical Review , 2006 .

[21]  Werner J. Severin,et al.  Communication Theories: Origins, Methods and Uses in the Mass Media , 1991 .

[22]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking: Multimedia Learning: Guiding Visuospatial Thinking with Instructional Animation , 2005 .

[23]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Digital game-based learning , 2000, CIE.

[24]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Learner-Centered Design: Reflections and New Directions , 2001 .

[25]  Chris Abel Architecture and Identity: Towards a Global Eco-Culture , 1997 .

[26]  Robin Mason,et al.  e-learning: The key concepts , 2006 .

[27]  Otto T. Mallery Declaration of Interdependence , 1953 .

[28]  Tadeja Zupancic,et al.  How Children Come to Understand Sustainable Development: A Contribution to Educational Agenda , 2013 .

[29]  Joanna D. Underwood EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2011 .

[30]  Špela Verovšek,et al.  Identifying spatial values in the opinions of teenagers , 2009 .

[31]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium , 2001 .

[32]  J. Durlak The Language of New Media , 2002 .

[33]  A. Scott,et al.  Dimensions of sustainability : architecture form, technology, environment, culture , 1998 .

[34]  Nada Bates-Brkljac Investigating perceptual responses and shared understanding of architectural design ideas when communicated through different forms of visual representations , 2007, 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV '07).

[35]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .