Health diagnostics with unexampled faulty states using a two-fold classification method

System health diagnostics provides diversified benefits such as improved safety, improved reliability and reduced costs for the operation and maintenance of engineered systems. Successful health diagnostics requires the knowledge of system failures. However, with an increasing complexity it is extraordinarily difficult to have a well-tested system so that all potential faulty states can be realized and studied at product testing stage. Thus, real time health diagnostics requires automatic detection of unexampled faulty states through the sensory signals to avoid sudden catastrophic system failures. This paper presents a hybrid inference approach (HIA) for structural health diagnosis with unexampled faulty states, which employs a two-fold inference process comprising of preliminary statistical learning based anomaly detection and artificial intelligence based health state classification for real time condition monitoring. The HIA is able to identify and isolate the unexampled faulty states through interactively detecting the deviation of sensory data from the known health states and forming new health states autonomously. The proposed approach takes the advantages of both statistical approaches and artificial intelligence based techniques and integrates them together in a unified diagnosis framework. The performance of proposed HIA is demonstrated with a power transformer and roller bearing health diagnosis case studies, where Mahalanobis distance serves as a representative statistical inference approach.

[1]  Derek C. Rose,et al.  Deep Machine Learning - A New Frontier in Artificial Intelligence Research [Research Frontier] , 2010, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[2]  N. Selvaganesan,et al.  FAULT DIAGNOSIS IN DEAERATOR USING NEURAL NETWORKS , 2007 .

[3]  Jay Lee,et al.  Robust performance degradation assessment methods for enhanced rolling element bearing prognostics , 2003, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[4]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Fast k-nearest neighbor classification using cluster-based trees , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  K. alik An efficient k'-means clustering algorithm , 2008 .

[6]  D. M. Allan,et al.  New techniques for monitoring the insulation quality of in-service HV apparatus , 1992 .

[7]  J. A. García-Souto,et al.  Measurements of mechanical vibrations at magnetic cores of power transformers with fiber-optic interferometric intrinsic sensor , 2000, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[8]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Genetic fuzzy system for online structural health monitoring of composite helicopter rotor blades , 2007 .

[9]  Ruxu Du,et al.  Fault diagnosis using support vector machine with an application in sheet metal stamping operations , 2004 .

[10]  Charles E Ebeling,et al.  An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering , 1996 .

[11]  Yee Whye Teh,et al.  A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets , 2006, Neural Computation.

[12]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Modified self-organising map for automated novelty detection applied to vibration signal monitoring , 2006 .

[13]  Ashraf Saad,et al.  Evolving an artificial neural network classifier for condition monitoring of rotating mechanical systems , 2007, Appl. Soft Comput..

[14]  Torsten Licht,et al.  Hierarchically Organized Bayesian Networks for Distributed Sensor Networks , 2002 .

[15]  James R. McDonald,et al.  The use of artificial neural networks for condition monitoring of electrical power transformers , 1998, Neurocomputing.

[16]  Steven Y. Liang,et al.  Dynamic Prognostic Prediction of Defect Propagation on Rolling Element Bearings , 1999 .

[17]  K. F. Martin,et al.  A review by discussion of condition monitoring and fault diagnosis in machine tools , 1994 .

[18]  Xiang Li,et al.  Data-driven approaches in health condition monitoring — A comparative study , 2010, IEEE ICCA 2010.

[19]  B. Samanta,et al.  Gear fault detection using artificial neural networks and support vector machines with genetic algorithms , 2004 .

[20]  T. Leibfried,et al.  Online monitors keep transformers in service , 1998 .

[21]  VARUN CHANDOLA,et al.  Outlier Detection : A Survey , 2007 .

[22]  Victoria J. Hodge,et al.  A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[23]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  DYNAMIC MODELLING FOR CONDITION MONITORING OF GAS TURBINES: GENETIC ALGORITHMS APPROACH , 2005 .

[24]  Byeng D. Youn,et al.  A Probabilistic Detectability-Based Structural Sensor Network Design Methodology for Prognostics and Health Management , 2010 .

[25]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Applications of maintenance optimization models : a review and analysis , 1996 .

[26]  Bo-Suk Yang,et al.  Condition classification of small reciprocating compressor for refrigeration using artificial neural networks and support vector machines , 2005 .

[27]  Robert E. Uhrig,et al.  Monitoring and diagnosis of rolling element bearings using artificial neural networks , 1993, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[28]  N. R. Sakthivel,et al.  Multi component fault diagnosis of rotational mechanical system based on decision tree and support vector machine , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Sanjay Ranka,et al.  An Efficient Space-Partitioning Based Algorithm for the K-Means Clustering , 1999, PAKDD.

[30]  Lifeng Xi,et al.  Residual life predictions for ball bearings based on self-organizing map and back propagation neural network methods , 2007 .

[31]  VARUN CHANDOLA,et al.  Anomaly detection: A survey , 2009, CSUR.

[32]  Byeng D. Youn,et al.  Multi-Sensor Health Diagnosis Using Deep Belief Network Based State Classification , 2011 .