Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches

[1]  C. Darwin.  The origin of species : by means natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life , 1920 .

[2]  Jonathan Wright,et al.  The biology hidden inside residual within‐individual phenotypic variation , 2015, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[3]  D. Shuker,et al.  The effect of experimental design on the measurement of mate choice: a meta-analysis , 2015 .

[4]  Holger Schielzeth,et al.  Quantifying the predictability of behaviour: statistical approaches for the study of between‐individual variation in the within‐individual variance , 2015 .

[5]  R. Bürger,et al.  The counterintuitive role of sexual selection in species maintenance and speciation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  R. Tinghitella.  Male and female crickets modulate their courtship behaviour depending on female experience with mate availability , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  G. Rosenthal,et al.  Genetic Variation and Covariation in Male Attractiveness and Female Mating Preferences in Drosophila melanogaster , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[8]  K. Lindström,et al.  Mate sampling and choosiness in the sand goby , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  G. Höbel,et al.  Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences , 2013, Ecology letters.

[10]  M. Briffa,et al.  How does temperature affect behaviour? Multilevel analysis of plasticity, personality and predictability in hermit crabs , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  K. Shaw,et al.  Multivariate sexual selection in a rapidly evolving speciation phenotype , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[13]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  Repeatability of mate preference functions in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae) , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Standardizing Selection Strengths to Study Selection in the Wild: A Critical Comparison and Suggestions for the Future , 2012 .

[15]  Reginald B. Cocroft,et al.  Males adjust signaling effort based on female mate-preference cues , 2012 .

[16]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  K. Schilling,et al.  Toward an Efficient and Integrative Analysis of Limited-Choice Behavioral Experiments , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  R. M. Hennig,et al.  Calling song signals and temporal preference functions in the cricket Teleogryllus leo , 2012, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Chronological vs. Physiological Age as Determinants of Mating Decisions: Studies on Female Choice Over Lifespan in An Acoustic Moth , 2012 .

[20]  David F Westneat,et al.  Individual Variation in Parental Care Reaction Norms: Integration of Personality and Plasticity , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[21]  A. Sih,et al.  Individual- and condition-dependent effects on habitat choice and choosiness , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  I. Booksmythe,et al.  Male fiddler crabs prefer conspecific females during simultaneous, but not sequential, mate choice , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  K. Reinhold.  VARIATION IN ACOUSTIC SIGNALLING TRAITS EXHIBITS FOOTPRINTS OF SEXUAL SELECTION , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  M. Zuk,et al.  Mating experience in field crickets modifies pre- and postcopulatory female choice in parallel , 2011 .

[25]  D. A. Gray,et al.  Heterospecific courtship and sequential mate choice in sister species of field crickets , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Economics of mate choice at leks: do female waxmoths pay costs for indirect genetic benefits? , 2010 .

[27]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Testing for Direct and Indirect Effects of Mate Choice by Manipulating Female Choosiness , 2009, Current Biology.

[28]  H. Schielzeth,et al.  HERITABILITY OF AND EARLY ENVIRONMENT EFFECTS ON VARIATION IN MATING PREFERENCES , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  J. Hilbe.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[30]  K. Reinhold.  Variation of Acoustic Courtship Signals in Insects and Amphibians: No Evidence for Bimodality, but Identical Dependence on Duration , 2009 .

[31]  R. Brooks,et al.  Experimental Evidence That Sexual Conflict Influences the Opportunity, Form and Intensity of Sexual Selection , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  N. Bailey.  Love will tear you apart: different components of female choice exert contrasting selection pressures on male field crickets , 2008 .

[33]  Manfred Hartbauer,et al.  Matched Filters, Mate Choice and the Evolution of Sexually Selected Traits , 2008, PloS one.

[34]  J. Hermisson,et al.  Competitive speciation and costs of choosiness , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[35]  J. Schul,et al.  Developmental plasticity of mating calls enables acoustic communication in diverse environments , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  T. Weber,et al.  Phonotactic response of female crickets on the Kramer treadmill: methodology, sensory and behavioural implications , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[37]  K. Orci.  Female Preferences for Male Song Characters in the Bush-Cricket Isophya camptoxypha (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea) , 2007, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[38]  M. Ritchie,et al.  MALE COURTSHIP SONG AND FEMALE PREFERENCE VARIATION BETWEEN PHYLOGEOGRAPHICALLY DISTINCT POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MONTANA , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[40]  R. Cocroft,et al.  Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Melissa Bateson,et al.  Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[42]  M. Ritchie,et al.  Variation, but no covariance, in female preference functions and male song in a natural population of Drosophila montana , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  Rima Izem,et al.  Variation in Continuous Reaction Norms: Quantifying Directions of Biological Interest , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[44]  M. Jennions,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR MULTIVARIATE STABILIZING SEXUAL SELECTION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  William E. Wagner,et al.  Signal components, acoustic preference functions and sexual selection in a cricket , 2004 .

[46]  D. Coltman,et al.  MATERNAL EFFECTS INFLUENCE THE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR OF SONS AND DAUGHTERS IN THE ZEBRA FINCH , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Optimal assessment of multiple cues , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  GENETIC VARIANCE AND PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN A COMPONENT OF FEMALE MATE CHOICE IN AN ULTRASONIC MOTH , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  Ann V. Hedrick,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[50]  K. Reinhold,et al.  Dissecting the repeatability of female choice in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  Johannes Schul,et al.  Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  J. Endler,et al.  FEMALE GUPPIES AGREE TO DIFFER: PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC VARIATION IN MATE‐CHOICE BEHAVIOR AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR SEXUAL SELECTION , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[53]  R. Bonduriansky.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[54]  L. Simmons,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN FEMALE PREFERENCE FUNCTIONS AND MALE SONGS OF THE FIELD CRICKET TELEOGRYLLUS OCEANICUS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  M. Ritchie,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF FEMALE PREFERENCE FUNCTIONS FOR DROSOPHILA MONTANA COURTSHIP SONG AND A TEST OF THE TEMPERATURE COUPLING HYPOTHESIS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  K. Shaw.  INTERSPECIFIC GENETICS OF MATE RECOGNITION: INHERITANCE OF FEMALE ACOUSTIC PREFERENCE IN HAWAIIAN CRICKETS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[57]  K. Shaw,et al.  Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  D. A. Gray,et al.  Intrinsic Factors Affecting Female Choice in House Crickets: Time Cost, Female Age, Nutritional Condition, Body Size, and Size-Relative Reproductive Investment , 1999, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[59]  W. Cade,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE FIELD CRICKET, GRYLLUS INTEGER , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[60]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  ABSOLUTE VERSUS RELATIVE MEASUREMENTS OF SEXUAL SELECTION: ASSESSING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF ULTRASONIC SIGNAL CHARACTERS TO MATE ATTRACTION IN LESSER WAX MOTHS, ACHROIA GRISELLA (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[61]  William E. Wagner.  Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  M. Petrie,et al.  VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[63]  M. Ritchie,et al.  The shape of female mating preferences. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  W. D. Brown,et al.  FEMALE CHOICE FOR AN INDICATOR OF MALE SIZE IN THE SONG OF THE BLACK‐HORNED TREE CRICKET, OECANTHUS NIGRICORNIS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLIDAE: OECANTHINAE) , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[65]  J. Endler,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR MALE TRAITS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[66]  W. Cade,et al.  Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets, Gryllus integer , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[67]  Thorleifur Eirıx0301ksson.  Female preference for specific pulse duration of male songs in the grasshopper, Omocestus viridulus , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[68]  L. Nagle,et al.  Condition-Dependent Choosiness For Highly Attractive Songs In Female Canaries , 2013 .

[69]  R. Kortet,et al.  Effects of body size on selectivity for mating cues in different sensory modalities , 2012 .

[70]  M. Zuk,et al.  Preexisting behavior facilitated the loss of a sexual signal in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus , 2008 .

[71]  M. Kasumovic,et al.  Risky mate search and mate preference in the golden orb-web spider (Nephila plumipes) , 2007 .

[72]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Quantitative genetics of female choice in an ultrasonic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella: variation and evolvability of preference along multiple dimensions of the male advertisement signal , 2000, Heredity.

[73]  Widemo,et al.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[74]  T. Weber,et al.  Variance in female responses to the fine structure of male song in the field cricket, Gryllus integer , 1998 .

[75]  R. Meldola.  Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.