Early Fusion Status after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation: A Comparison of Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Cages and Carbon Polyetheretherketone Cages

Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Purpose We recently reported that when compared to posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using traditional pedicle screw fixation, PLIF with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation (CBT-PLIF) provided favorable clinical outcomes and reduced the incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment pathology, but resulted in relatively lower fusion rates. Since titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages (TP) could improve and accelerate fusion status after CBT-PLIF, early fusion status was compared between CBT-PLIF using TP and carbon PEEK cages (CP). Overview of Literature A systematic review demonstrated that clinical studies at this early stage show similar fusion rates for TP compared to PEEK cages. Methods We studied 36 consecutive patients undergoing CBT-PLIF with TP (TP group) and 92 undergoing CBT-PLIF with CP (CP group). On multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography (MPR-CT) at 6 months postoperatively, vertebral endplate cysts (cyst signs) were evaluated and classified as diffuse or local cysts. Early fusion status was assessed by dynamic plain radiographs and MPR-CT at 1 year postoperatively. Results The incidences of cyst signs, diffuse cysts, and early fusion rate in the TP and CP groups were 38.9% and 66.3% (p<0.01), 16.7% and 32.6% (p=0.07), and 83.3% and 79.3% (p>0.05), respectively. Combining the two groups, 22 of 36 patients with diffuse cysts had nonunion at 1-year follow-up, compared to only three of 92 patients with local cysts or without cyst signs (p<0.01). Conclusions Despite having fewer patients with endplate cysts at 6 months (a known risk factor for nonunion), the TP group had the same fusion rate as the CP group at 1-year follow-up. Thus, TP did not accelerate the fusion process after CBT-PLIF.

[1]  T. Nakayama,et al.  Vertebral Endplate Cyst as a Predictor of Nonunion After Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages , 2016, Spine.

[2]  Hironobu Sakaura,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[3]  W. Walsh,et al.  Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages: a systematic review and preclinical evaluation , 2017, European Spine Journal.

[4]  N. Hosogane,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  W. Walsh,et al.  Plasma-sprayed titanium coating to polyetheretherketone improves the bone-implant interface. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Effect of Physiological Loads on Cortical and Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation , 2014, Spine.

[7]  A. Fujikawa,et al.  Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[8]  W. Walsh,et al.  Spine Interbody Implants: Material Selection and Modification, Functionalization and Bioactivation of Surfaces to Improve Osseointegration , 2014, Orthopaedic surgery.

[9]  Rui Ma,et al.  Current Strategies to Improve the Bioactivity of PEEK , 2014, International journal of molecular sciences.

[10]  T. Asazuma,et al.  In Vivo Analysis of Insertional Torque During Pedicle Screwing Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique , 2014, Spine.

[11]  C. Guyer,et al.  Abstracts , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[12]  N. Crawford,et al.  Biomechanics of Lumbar Cortical Screw–Rod Fixation Versus Pedicle Screw–Rod Fixation With and Without Interbody Support , 2013, Spine.

[13]  M. Neo,et al.  A novel synthetic material for spinal fusion: a prospective clinical trial of porous bioactive titanium metal for lumbar interbody fusion , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[14]  C. Puttlitz,et al.  Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[15]  G. Gronowicz,et al.  The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrates compared to commercially pure titanium. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[16]  S. Kurtz,et al.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[17]  Tomio Yamamoto,et al.  Clinical and Radiological Results of PLIF for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis , 1998 .

[18]  K. Yone,et al.  Indication of Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients and Its Significance , 1996, Spine.