Industrial Clustering and the Returns to Inventive Activity Canadian Biotechnology Firms, 1991-2000

We examine how industrial clustering affects biotechnology firms’ innovativeness, contrasting similar firms not located in clusters or located in clusters that are or are not focused on the firm’s technological specialization. Using detailed firm level data, we find clustered firms are eight times more innovative than geographically remote firms, with largest effects for firms located in clusters strong in their own specialization. For firms located in a cluster strong in their specialization we also find that R&D productivity is enhanced by a firm’s own R&D alliances and also by the R&D alliances of other colocated firms.

[1]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[2]  A. Marshall,et al.  Principles of Economics , 1891 .

[3]  Jan Kmenta,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1988 .

[4]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks , 1974 .

[5]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[6]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[7]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D, Patents, and Productivity , 1981 .

[8]  D. Mowery.  The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940 , 1983 .

[9]  Lung-fei Lee.  Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity , 1983 .

[10]  J. Coleman.  Longitudinal data analysis , 1984 .

[11]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[12]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[15]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[16]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[17]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[18]  D. Angel.  High-Technology Agglomeration and the Labor Market: The Case of Silicon Valley , 1991 .

[19]  R. Wilkins,et al.  How far is it to the nearest hospital? Calculating distances using the Statistics Canada Postal Code Conversion File. , 1993, Health reports.

[20]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and recipient firm size , 1994 .

[21]  Maryann P. Feldman.  The geography of innovation , 1994 .

[22]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors , 1995, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[23]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991 , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[25]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Learning Races, Patent Races, and Capital Races: Strategic Interaction and Embeddedness within Organizational Fields , 1996 .

[26]  P. Swann,et al.  A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology , 1996 .

[27]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[28]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  A cognitive model of innovation , 1998 .

[29]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology , 1998 .

[30]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[31]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[32]  Rui Baptista,et al.  A comparison of clustering dynamics in the US and UK computer industries , 1999 .

[33]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[35]  N. Lowe,et al.  The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative: A cognitive model , 2000 .

[36]  C. Beaudry.  Entry, Growth and Patenting in Industrial Clusters: A Study of the Aerospace Industry in the UK , 2001 .

[37]  Scott J. Wallsten,et al.  An empirical test of geographic knowledge spillovers using geographic information systems and firm-level data , 2001 .

[38]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Peter E. Kennedy,et al.  A Guide to Econometrics, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[40]  S. Breschi,et al.  Are firms in clusters really more innovative? , 2003 .

[41]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms , 2003 .

[42]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[43]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[44]  M. Fontes.  Distant networking: The knowledge acquisition strategies of 'out-cluster' biotechnology firms , 2005 .