Nucleosomes Are Essential for Proper Regulation of a Multigated Promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) are present immediately adjacent to the transcription start site in most eukaryotic promoters. Here we show that NDRs in the upstream promoter region can profoundly affect gene regulation. Chromatin at the yeast HO promoter is highly repressive and numerous coactivators are required for expression. We modified the HO promoter with segments from the well-studied CLN2 NDR, creating chimeric promoters differing in nucleosome occupancy but with binding sites for the same activator, SBF. Nucleosome depletion resulted in substantial increases in both factor binding and gene expression and allowed activation from a much longer distance, probably by allowing recruited coactivators to act further downstream. Nucleosome depletion also affected sequential activation of the HO promoter; HO activation typically requires the ordered recruitment of activators first to URS1, second to the left-half of URS2 (URS2-L), and finally to the right-half of URS2 (URS2-R), with each region representing distinct gates that must be unlocked to achieve activation. The absence of nucleosomes at URS2-L resulted in promoters no longer requiring both the URS1 and URS2-L gates, as either gate alone is now sufficient to promote binding of the SBF factor to URS2-R. Furthermore, nucleosome depletion at URS2 altered the timing of HO expression and bypassed the regulation that restricts expression to mother cells. Our results reveal insight into how nucleosomes can create a requirement for ordered recruitment of factors to facilitate complex transcriptional regulation.

[1]  Albert J. Keung,et al.  Chromatin regulation at the frontier of synthetic biology , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  D. Stillman,et al.  Spatiotemporal Cascade of Transcription Factor Binding Required for Promoter Activation , 2014, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[3]  D. Stillman,et al.  Dancing the cell cycle two-step: regulation of yeast G1-cell-cycle genes by chromatin structure. , 2013, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[4]  Mayu Inaba,et al.  Asymmetric stem cell division: precision for robustness. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[5]  D. Stillman,et al.  Repressive Chromatin Affects Factor Binding at Yeast HO (Homothallic Switching) Promoter* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  F. Cross,et al.  Multiple sequence-specific factors generate the nucleosome-depleted region on CLN2 promoter. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[7]  F. Cross,et al.  Nucleosome-depleted regions in cell-cycle-regulated promoters ensure reliable gene expression in every cell cycle. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[8]  K. Struhl,et al.  Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[9]  A. Regev,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Circuits: Predicting Numbers from Alphabets , 2009, Science.

[10]  D. Stillman,et al.  FACT and Asf1 regulate nucleosome dynamics and coactivator binding at the HO promoter. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[11]  H. Madhani,et al.  Mechanisms that Specify Promoter Nucleosome Location and Identity , 2009, Cell.

[12]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome , 2009, Nature.

[13]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[14]  G. L. Law,et al.  The Transcriptional Coactivators SAGA, SWI/SNF, and Mediator Make Distinct Contributions to Activation of Glucose-repressed Genes* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Frederick R. Cross,et al.  Positive feedback of G1 cyclins ensures coherent cell cycle entry , 2008, Nature.

[16]  Bryan J Venters,et al.  A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. , 2008, Genome research.

[17]  Stephan C. Schuster,et al.  Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome , 2008, Nature.

[18]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  Dynamic Regulation of Nucleosome Positioning in the Human Genome , 2008, Cell.

[19]  J. Knoblich,et al.  Mechanisms of Asymmetric Stem Cell Division , 2008, Cell.

[20]  J. Lieb,et al.  Forkhead proteins control the outcome of transcription factor binding by antiactivation , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[21]  R. Morse Transcription factor access to promoter elements , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[22]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[23]  K. Struhl,et al.  The Swi/Snf Complex Is Important for Histone Eviction during Transcriptional Activation and RNA Polymerase II Elongation In Vivo , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[24]  J. Reese,et al.  Exposing the core promoter is sufficient to activate transcription and alter coactivator requirement at RNR3 , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Bing Li,et al.  The Role of Chromatin during Transcription , 2007, Cell.

[26]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  A genomic code for nucleosome positioning , 2006, Nature.

[27]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[28]  D. Stillman,et al.  SWI/SNF Binding to the HO Promoter Requires Histone Acetylation and Stimulates TATA-Binding Protein Recruitment , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[29]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Genome-Scale Identification of Nucleosome Positions in S. cerevisiae , 2005, Science.

[30]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Distinction and relationship between elongation rate and processivity of RNA polymerase II in vivo. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[31]  T. Miyake,et al.  Comparison of ABF1 and RAP1 in Chromatin Opening and Transactivator Potentiation in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[32]  D. Stillman,et al.  TATA-Binding Protein Mutants That Are Lethal in the Absence of the Nhp6 High-Mobility-Group Protein , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[33]  J. Tyler,et al.  Chromatin disassembly mediated by the histone chaperone Asf1 is essential for transcriptional activation of the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 genes. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[34]  U. Oechsner,et al.  Reb1p-dependent DNA Bending Effects Nucleosome Positioning and Constitutive Transcription at the Yeast Profilin Promoter* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  J. Martens,et al.  Cascade of Distinct Histone Modifications during Collagenase Gene Activation , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[36]  M. Cosma Ordered recruitment: gene-specific mechanism of transcription activation. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[37]  M. Holland,et al.  Transcript Abundance in Yeast Varies over Six Orders of Magnitude* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  I. Talianidis,et al.  Coordination of PIC Assembly and Chromatin Remodeling During Differentiation-Induced Gene Activation , 2002, Science.

[39]  M. Grunstein,et al.  Hyperacetylation of chromatin at the ADH2 promoter allows Adr1 to bind in repressed conditions , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[40]  D. Stillman,et al.  The Swi5 activator recruits the Mediator complex to the HO promoter without RNA polymerase II. , 2001, Genes & development.

[41]  M. Resnick,et al.  In vivo site-directed mutagenesis using oligonucleotides , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[42]  Myles Brown,et al.  Cofactor Dynamics and Sufficiency in Estrogen Receptor–Regulated Transcription , 2000, Cell.

[43]  Dimitris Thanos,et al.  Ordered Recruitment of Chromatin Modifying and General Transcription Factors to the IFN-β Promoter , 2000, Cell.

[44]  K. Nasmyth,et al.  Ordered Recruitment of Transcription and Chromatin Remodeling Factors to a Cell Cycle– and Developmentally Regulated Promoter , 1999, Cell.

[45]  Ira Herskowitz,et al.  Identification of an Asymmetrically Localized Determinant, Ash1p, Required for Lineage-Specific Transcription of the Yeast HO Gene , 1996, Cell.

[46]  Kim Nasmyth,et al.  Asymmetric Accumulation of Ash1p in Postanaphase Nuclei Depends on a Myosin and Restricts Yeast Mating-Type Switching to Mother Cells , 1996, Cell.

[47]  Gail Mandel,et al.  REST: A mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons , 1995, Cell.

[48]  L. Grivell,et al.  The multifunctional regulatory proteins ABF1 and CPF1 are involved in the formation of a nuclease‐hypersensitive region in the promoter of the QCR8 gene , 1993, Yeast.

[49]  Ellson Y. Chen,et al.  Overview of manual and automated DNA sequencing by the dideoxy chain termination method , 1991 .

[50]  David Lydall,et al.  The identification of a second cell cycle control on the HO promoter in yeast: Cell cycle regulation of SWI5 nuclear entry , 1990, Cell.

[51]  Ira Herskowitz,et al.  A regulatory hierarchy for cell specialization in yeast , 1989, Nature.

[52]  Rodney Rothstein,et al.  Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA , 1989, Cell.

[53]  A. Klug,et al.  The structure of an oligo(dA)·oligo(dT) tract and its biological implications , 1987, Nature.

[54]  K. Nasmyth At least 1400 base pairs of 5′-flanking DNA is required for the correct expression of the HO gene in yeast , 1985, Cell.

[55]  L. Guarente,et al.  Upstream activation sites of the CYC1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are active when inverted but not when placed downstream of the "TATA box". , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  K. Struhl Genetic properties and chromatin structure of the yeast gal regulatory element: an enhancer-like sequence. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  A. Imbalzano,et al.  of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor � Nuclear Hormone Receptor , 2003 .

[58]  S. Krobitsch,et al.  Additional data file 4 , 2003 .

[59]  S. Dorland,et al.  Parallel pathways of gene regulation: homologous regulators SWI5 and ACE2 differentially control transcription of HO and chitinase. , 1992, Genes & development.

[60]  F. Sherman Getting started with yeast. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[61]  R. Rothstein Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[62]  The FASEB Journal • FJ Express Full-Length Article Many expressed genes in bacteria and yeast are transcribed only once per cell cycle , 2022 .