Optimal marker‐adaptive designs for targeted therapy based on imperfectly measured biomarkers

type="main" xml:id="rssc12092-abs-0001"> Targeted therapy revolutionizes the way that physicians treat cancer and other diseases, enabling them to select individualized treatment adaptively according to the patient's biomarker profile. The implementation of targeted therapy requires that the biomarkers are accurately measured, which may not always be feasible in practice. We propose two optimal marker-adaptive trial designs in which the biomarkers are subject to measurement errors. The first design focuses on a patient's individual benefit and minimizes the treatment assignment error so that each patient has the highest probability of being assigned to the treatment that matches his or her true biomarker status. The second design focuses on the group benefit, which maximizes the overall response rate for all the patients enrolled in the trial. We develop a Wald test to evaluate the treatment effects for marker subgroups at the end of the trial and derive the corresponding asymptotic power function. Simulation studies and an application to a lymphoma cancer trial show that the optimal designs proposed achieve our design goal and obtain desirable operating characteristics.

[1]  L. Cantley,et al.  Ras, PI(3)K and mTOR signalling controls tumour cell growth , 2006, Nature.

[2]  J Jack Lee,et al.  Bayesian adaptive randomization designs for targeted agent development , 2008, Clinical trials.

[3]  G. Sledge,et al.  What is targeted therapy? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  R. Simon,et al.  Adaptive Signature Design: An Adaptive Clinical Trial Design for Generating and Prospectively Testing A Gene Expression Signature for Sensitive Patients , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  J. Byrd,et al.  Evidence of Clinical Activity in a Phase 1 Study of CAL-101, An Oral P110Δ Isoform-Selective Inhibitor of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Malignancies. , 2009 .

[6]  R. Simon,et al.  On the efficiency of targeted clinical trials , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  R. Simon,et al.  Evaluating the Efficiency of Targeted Designs for Randomized Clinical Trials , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  R H Lyles,et al.  A detailed evaluation of adjustment methods for multiplicative measurement error in linear regression with applications in occupational epidemiology. , 1997, Biometrics.

[10]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: theoretical considerations and practical challenges. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  R. Simon,et al.  The Cross-Validated Adaptive Signature Design , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  M. Ringnér,et al.  Poor prognosis in carcinoma is associated with a gene expression signature of aberrant PTEN tumor suppressor pathway activity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.