Electromyographic Comparison of Barbell Deadlift, Hex Bar Deadlift, and Hip Thrust Exercises: A Cross-Over Study

Abstract Andersen, V, Fimland, MS, Mo, D-A, Iversen, VM, Vederhus, T, Rockland Hellebø, LR, Nordaune, KI, and Saeterbakken, AH. Electromyographic comparison of barbell deadlift, hex bar deadlift, and hip thrust exercises: a cross-over study. J Strength Cond Res 32(3): 587–593, 2018—The aim of the study was to compare the muscle activation level of the gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, and erector spinae in the hip thrust, barbell deadlift, and hex bar deadlift; each of which are compound resisted hip extension exercises. After 2 familiarization sessions, 13 resistance-trained men performed a 1 repetition maximum in all 3 exercises in 1 session, in randomized and counterbalanced order. The whole ascending movement (concentric phase), as well as its lower and upper parts (whole movement divided in 2), were analyzed. The hip thrust induced greater activation of the gluteus maximus compared with the hex bar deadlift in the whole (16%, p = 0.025) and the upper part (26%, p = 0.015) of the movement. For the whole movement, the biceps femoris was more activated during barbell deadlift compared with both the hex bar deadlift (28%, p < 0.001) and hip thrust (20%, p = 0.005). In the lower part of the movement, the biceps femoris activation was, respectively, 48% and 26% higher for the barbell deadlift (p < 0.001) and hex bar deadlift (p = 0.049) compared with hip thrust. Biceps femoris activation in the upper part of the movement was 39% higher for the barbell deadlift compared with the hex bar deadlift (p = 0.001) and 34% higher for the hip thrust compared with the hex bar deadlift (p = 0.002). No differences were displayed for the erector spinae activation (p = 0.312–0.859). In conclusion, the barbell deadlift was clearly superior in activating the biceps femoris compared with the hex bar deadlift and hip thrust, whereas the hip thrust provided the highest gluteus maximus activation.

[1]  L. Brown,et al.  An Examination of Muscle Activation and Power Characteristics While Performing the Deadlift Exercise With Straight and Hexagonal Barbells , 2016, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[2]  C. Powers,et al.  Differences in hip kinematics, muscle strength, and muscle activation between subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. , 2009, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[3]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Hip strength and knee pain in females. , 2007, North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT.

[4]  G M Hägg,et al.  Normalization of surface EMG amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies - A review. , 1995, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[5]  Benjamin F. Johnson,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of the Powerlifting Style Squat and the Conventional Deadlift During Competition: Is There a Cross-Over Effect Between Lifts? , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[6]  A. Saeterbakken,et al.  Muscle Activation and Strength in Squat and Bulgarian Squat on Stable and Unstable Surface , 2014, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[7]  A. Saeterbakken,et al.  Elastic Bands in Combination With Free Weights in Strength Training: Neuromuscular Effects , 2015, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[8]  B. Schoenfeld,et al.  A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyographic Activity in the Back Squat and Barbell Hip Thrust Exercises. , 2015, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[9]  Hyun-Ok Lee†,et al.  How Different Knee Flexion Angles Influence the Hip Extensor in the Prone Position , 2013, Journal of physical therapy science.

[10]  John B Cronin,et al.  Effects of a Six-Week Hip Thrust vs. Front Squat Resistance Training Program on Performance in Adolescent Males: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2017, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[11]  Jørgen Skotte,et al.  Kettlebell swing targets semitendinosus and supine leg curl targets biceps femoris: an EMG study with rehabilitation implications , 2012, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[12]  B. Schoenfeld,et al.  A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyography Amplitude for the Barbell, Band, and American Hip Thrust Variations. , 2016, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[13]  Arif Mithat Amca,et al.  Kinematic and EMG activities during front and back squat variations in maximum loads , 2015, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  Stuart M McGill,et al.  Kettlebell Swing, Snatch, and Bottoms-Up Carry: Back and Hip Muscle Activation, Motion, and Low Back Loads , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[15]  P. Cormie,et al.  ISOMETRIC SQUAT FORCE OUTPUT AND MUSCLE ACTIVITY IN STABLE AND UNSTABLE CONDITIONS , 2006, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[16]  John W Chow,et al.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Back and Front Squats in Healthy Trained Individuals , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[17]  Ioannis Agouris,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Straight and Hexagonal Barbell Deadlifts Using Submaximal Loads , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[18]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[19]  John Cronin,et al.  A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyography Amplitude in the Parallel, Full, and Front Squat Variations in Resistance-Trained Females. , 2016, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[20]  Position Stand American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  B. Schoenfeld,et al.  Barbell Hip Thrust , 2011 .

[22]  Dario Farina,et al.  Interpretation of the Surface Electromyogram in Dynamic Contractions , 2006, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.