Arctic connectivity: A frugal approach to infrastructural development

As the Arctic is heating up, so are efforts to strengthen connectivity within the region, but also to enhance the connections from remote settlements to the global networks of trade as well as sociality. With global interest in the Arctic on the rise, it becomes increasingly relevant to ensure that investments in arctic infrastructure actually serve the people of the Arctic, while promoting industrial and commercial innovation in the region through widespread access to broadband and Internet of Things (IoT) services. This calls for interdisciplinary research strategies that are able to connect and integrate technological and societal approaches, which are commonly applied separately and in isolation from one another. In this article, we propose an interdisciplinary collaborative research agenda for Arctic connectivity. Drawing on examples from Greenland, we stress the need for localized knowledge to design valuable and cost-effective connectivity solutions that cover the needs for everyday life and may also provide a new set of collaborative connectivity tools for innovation at an international level. Such solutions, termed ‘frugal connectivity’, are vital for the development of connected Arctic communities.

[1]  Alexander A. Kist,et al.  Low Power Wide Area Networks: A Survey of Enabling Technologies, Applications and Interoperability Needs , 2018, IEEE Access.

[2]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity , 2015 .

[3]  R. Jensen.  The Digital Provide: Information (Technology), Market Performance, and Welfare in the South Indian Fisheries Sector , 2007 .

[4]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide , 2002, First Monday.

[5]  Abhay Karandikar,et al.  Connecting the Unconnected: Toward Frugal 5G Network Architecture and Standardization , 2019, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine.

[6]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Introduction: An Agenda for Infrastructure Studies , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Melissa Gregg.  Available in Selected Metros Only Rural Melancholy and the Promise of Online Connectivity , 2010 .

[8]  John Yen,et al.  Introduction , 2004, CACM.

[9]  István Z. Kovács,et al.  Coverage and Capacity Analysis of Sigfox, LoRa, GPRS, and NB-IoT , 2017, 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[10]  P. Schweitzer,et al.  Beyond wilderness: towards an anthropology of infrastructure and the built environment in the Russian North , 2017, The polar journal.

[11]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  A Key 6G Challenge and Opportunity—Connecting the Base of the Pyramid: A Survey on Rural Connectivity , 2020, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  C. Ren,et al.  Steaming Up or Staying Cool? Tourism Development and Greenlandic Futures in the Light of Climate Change , 2015, ARCTIC ANTHROPOLOGY.

[13]  Matti Latva-aho,et al.  Wireless Connectivity for Remote and Arctic Areas – Food for Thought , 2019, 2019 16th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS).

[14]  Gili S. Drori.  Globalization and Technology Divides: Bifurcation of Policy between the Digital Divide and the Innovation Divide , 2010 .

[15]  Lena Trojer,et al.  Broadband Access Technologies for Rural Connectivity in Developing Countries , 2011 .

[16]  H. Feußner,et al.  5th-Generation Mobile Communication: Data Highway for Surgery 4.0. , 2019, Surgical technology international.

[17]  Stefano Cioni,et al.  5G satellite networks for Internet of Things: Offloading and backhauling , 2021, International Journal of Satellite Communications And Networking.

[18]  Ashir Ahmed,et al.  Next generation communication technologies: Wireless mesh network for rural connectivity , 2011, 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[19]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[20]  How ICT Policy and Regulation Is Failing the ‘Less Connected’ in South Africa , 2018 .

[21]  Prasanna Chaporkar,et al.  A Framework for Wireless Broadband Network for Connecting the Unconnected , 2017, ArXiv.

[22]  A. Jørgensen.  Kunuk took it to the streets of Greenland: single-issue protests in a young online democracy , 2017 .

[23]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  5G-Enabled Tactile Internet , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[24]  Matti Latva-aho,et al.  A 6G White Paper on Connectivity for Remote Areas , 2020, ArXiv.

[25]  I. Willig,et al.  Tusagassiuutit 2018: en kortlægning af de grønlandske medier , 2018 .

[26]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless software-defined networks (W-SDNs) and network function virtualization (NFV) for 5G cellular systems: An overview and qualitative evaluation , 2015, Comput. Networks.

[27]  Genevieve Bell,et al.  Through Country Women': A proposal for the CWA's role in rural connectivity , 2008 .

[28]  P. Schweitzer,et al.  A right to remoteness? A missing bridge and articulations of indigeneity along an East Siberian railroad , 2019, Social anthropology : the journal of the European Association of Social Anthropologists = Anthropologie sociale.

[29]  Deepak Prem Subramony.  Understanding the Complex Dimensions of the Digital Divide: Lessons Learned in the Alaskan Arctic. , 2007 .