Toward the simulation of complex 3D shear flows using unsteady statistical turbulence models

Recent progress in the numerical simulation of complex, 3D incompressible flows with unsteady statistical turbulence models is reviewed. A second-order accurate, overset grid, numerical method is developed for carrying out unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) and detached-eddy simulations (DES) of flows in complex multi-connected domains. Results are reported for three test cases: (1) flow in a channel with four bottom-mounted rectangular piers; (2) flow in a channel with a corner-mounted rectangular block; and (3) flow in a strongly curved rectangular bend. Comparisons between the computed results and laboratory measurements and flow visualization experiments lead to the conclusion that even relatively simple turbulence closure models (such as the standard k–e model or the one-equation Spalart–Allmaras model) can simulate complex, 3D flows dominated by geometryinduced, large-scale instabilities and unsteady coherent structures with reasonable accuracy. The results for the curved duct case further show that exciting and resolving directly with unsteady statistical turbulence models the low-frequency, large-scale, vortical rolls in a concave wall boundary layer is critical prerequisite for simulating the dramatic effects of concave curvature on the structure

[1]  P. Spalart.  Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations , 2000 .

[2]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Coherent Structures in Flat-Bed Abutment Flow: Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Experiments , 2003 .

[3]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of a concave wall boundary layer , 1996 .

[4]  V. C. Patel,et al.  Origin and Decay of Longitudinal Vortices in Developing Flow in a Curved Rectangular Duct (Data Bank Contribution) , 1994 .

[5]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  An overset-grid method for 3D unsteady incompressible flows , 2003 .

[6]  V. C. Patel,et al.  Longitudinal curvature effects in turbulent boundary layers , 1997 .

[7]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  DES GRID RESOLUTION ISSUES FOR VORTICAL FLOWS ON A DELTA WING AND AN F-18C , 2003 .

[8]  I. Celik,et al.  Random Flow Generation Technique for Large Eddy Simulations and Particle-Dynamics Modeling , 2001 .

[9]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Assessment of artificial dissipation models for three- dimensional incompressible flow solutions , 1997 .

[10]  P. Spalart.  A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[11]  Scott A. Morton,et al.  Progress on detached-eddy simulation of massively separated flows , 2002 .

[12]  P. Durbin.  SEPARATED FLOW COMPUTATIONS WITH THE K-E-V2 MODEL , 1995 .

[13]  K. Thompson.  Time-dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, II , 1990 .

[14]  M. Strelets.  Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows , 2001 .

[15]  Antonis Chrisohoides,et al.  Experimental visualization of Lagrangian coherent structures in aperiodic flows , 2003 .

[16]  V. C. Patel,et al.  Turbulence anisotropy and near-wall modeling in predicting three-dimensional shear-flows , 1995 .

[17]  Kyle D. Squires,et al.  Turbulence modeling applied to flow over a sphere , 2003 .

[18]  P. Spalart.  Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach , 1997 .

[19]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Detached-Eddy Simulations Over a Simplified Landing Gear , 2002 .

[20]  Robert S. Barlow,et al.  Structure of a turbulent boundary layer on a concave surface , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Comparison of numerical methods applied to the flow over wall-mounted cubes , 2002 .

[22]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Flow Through a Curved Duct Using Nonlinear Two-Equation Turbulence Models , 1998 .

[23]  Masud Behnia,et al.  Reynolds averaged simulation of unsteady separated flow , 2003 .

[24]  Awatef Hamed,et al.  DETACHED EDDY SIMULATIONS OF SUPERSONIC FLOW OVER CAVITY , 2003 .