The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management

Ecosystem management is management driven by explicit goals, executed by policies, protocols, and practices, and made adaptable by monitoring and research based on our best understanding of the ecological interactions and processes necessary to sustain ecosystem composition, structure, and function. In recent years, sustainability has become an explicitly stated, even legislatively mandated, goal of natural resource management agencies. In practice, however, management approaches have often focused on maximizing short-term yield and economic gain rather than long-term sustainability. Several obstacles contribute to this disparity, including: (1) inadequate information on the biological diversity of environments; (2) widespread ignorance of the function and dynamics of ecosystems; (3) the openness and interconnectedness of ecosystems on scales that transcend management boundaries; (4) a prevailing public perception that the immediate economic and social value of supposedly renewable resources outweighs the risk of future ecosystem damage or the benefits of alternative management approaches. The goal of ecosystem management is to overcome these obstacles. Ecosystem management includes the following elements: (1) Sustainability. Ecosystem management does not focus primarily on deliverables" but rather regards intergenerational sustainability as a precondition. (2) Goals. Ecosystem management establishes measurable goals that specify future processes and outcomes necessary for sustainability. (3) Sound ecological models and understanding. Ecosystem management relies on research performed at all levels of ecological organization. (4) Complexity and connectedness. Ecosystem management recognizes that biological diversity and structural complexity strengthen ecosystems against disturbance and supply the genetic resources necessary to adapt to long-term change. (5) The dynamic character of ecosystems. Recognizing that change and evolution are inherent in ecosystem sustainability, ecosystem management avoids attempts to freeze" ecosystems in a particular state or configuration. (6) Context and scale. Ecosystem processes operate over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, and their behavior at any given location is greatly affected by surrounding systems. Thus, there is no single appropriate scale or time frame for management. (7) Humans as ecosystem components. Ecosystem management values the active role of humans in achieving sustainable management goals. (8) Adaptability and accountability. Ecosystem management acknowledges that current knowledge and paradigms of ecosystem function are provisional, incomplete, and subject to change. Management approaches must be viewed as hypotheses to be tested by research and monitoring programs. The following are fundamental scientific precepts for ecosystem management. (1) Spatial and temporal scale are critical. Ecosystem function includes inputs, outputs, cycling of materials and energy, and the interactions of organisms. Boundaries defined for the study or management of one process are often inappropriate for the study of others; thus, ecosystem management requires a broad view. (2) Ecosystem function depends on its structure, diversity, and integrity. Ecosystem management seeks to maintain biological diversity as a critical component in strengthening ecosystems against disturbance. Thus, management of biological diversity requires a broad perspective and recognition that the complexity and function of any particular location is influenced heavily by the surrounding system. (3) Ecosystems are dynamic in space and time. Ecosystem management is challenging in part because ecosystems are constantly changing. Over time scales of decades or centuries, many landscapes are altered by natural disturbances that lead to mosaics of successional patches of different ages. Such patch dynamics are critical to ecosystem structure and function. (4) Uncertainty, surprise, and limits to knowledge. Ecosystem management acknowledges that, given sufficient time and space, unlikely events are certain to occur. Adaptive management addresses this uncertainty by combining democratic principles, scientific analysis, education, and institutional learning to increase our understanding of ecosystem processes and the consequences of management interventions, and to improve the quality of data upon which decisions must be made. Ecosystem management requires application of ecological science to natural resource actions. Moving from concepts to practice is a daunting challenge and will require the following steps and actions. (1) Defining sustainable goals and objectives. Sustainable strategies for the provision of ecosystem goods and services cannot take as their starting points statements of need or want such as mandated timber supply, water demand, or arbitrarily set harvests of shrimp or fish. Rather, sustainability must be the primary objective, and levels of commodity and amenity provision must be adjusted to meet that goal. (2) Reconciling spatial scales. Implementation of ecosystem management would be greatly simplified if management jurisdictions were spatially congruent with the behavior of ecosystem processes. Given the variation in spatial domain among processes, one perfect fit for all processes is virtually impossible; rather, ecosystem management must seek consensus among the various stakeholders within each ecosystem. (3) Reconciling temporal scales. Whereas management agencies are often forced to make decisions on a fiscal-year basis, ecosystem management must deal with time scales that transcend human lifetimes. Ecosystem management requires long-term planning and commitment. (4) Making the system adaptable and accountable. Successful ecosystem management requires institutions that are adaptable to changes in ecosystem characteristics and in our knowledge base. Adaptive management by definition requires the scientist's ongoing interaction with managers and the public. Communication must flow in both directions, and scientists must be willing to prioritize their research with regard to critical management needs. Scientists have much to offer in the development of monitoring programs, particularly in creating sampling approaches, statistical analyses, and scientific models. As our knowledge base evolves, scientists must develop new mechanisms to communicate research and management results. More professionals with an understanding of scientific, management, and social issues, and the ability to communicate with scientists, managers, and the public are needed. Ecosystem management is not a rejection of an anthropocentric for a totally biocentric worldview. Rather it is management that acknowledges the importance of human needs while at the same time confronting the reality that the capacity of our world to meet those needs in perpetuity has limits and depends on the functioning of ecosystems.

[1]  Peter S. Maitland,et al.  The trophic cascade in lakes , 1998 .

[2]  J. Lawton,et al.  Linking Species and Ecosystems , 1996 .

[3]  L. Talbot Living resource conservation : an international overview , 1996 .

[4]  H. Mooney,et al.  Functional roles of biodiversity: a global perspective , 1996 .

[5]  Carl Hosticka,et al.  Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment , 1995 .

[6]  J. Downing,et al.  Biodiversity and stability in grasslands , 1996, Nature.

[7]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Functional and Numerical Responses: A Framework for Fish‐Angler Interactions? , 1994 .

[8]  R. E. Grumbine What Is Ecosystem Management , 1994 .

[9]  Michael Taylor Diversity of life , 1994, Nature.

[10]  S. Fain,et al.  Assessment of genetic diversity of seagrass populations using DNA fingerprinting: implications for population stability and management. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  James H. Cowan,et al.  The ecosystem approach: Its use and abuse , 1993 .

[12]  C. Oliver,et al.  Managing for multiple values , 1993 .

[13]  Joel B. Hagen,et al.  An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology , 1993 .

[14]  T. Swetnam Fire History and Climate Change in Giant Sequoia Groves , 1993, Science.

[15]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Investing in Research for Sustainability. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  Donald Ludwig,et al.  Uncertainty, Resource Exploitation, and Conservation: Lessons from History. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[17]  D. Slocombe Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management , 1993 .

[18]  W. Aron,et al.  Fisheries management. , 1993, Science.

[19]  National Research Council,et al.  Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. , 1993 .

[20]  C. Walters,et al.  Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. , 1993, Science.

[21]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Humans as components of ecosystems : the ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas , 1993 .

[22]  F. Golley A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology: More Than the Sum o f the Parts , 1993 .

[23]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[24]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Can Fisheries Agencies Learn from Experience , 1992 .

[25]  G. J. Mayhead,et al.  Forestry research—A mandate for change: National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1990, 84 pp., 3 Tables, 1 Figure, US$14.95, paperback, ISBN 0-309-04248-8 , 1992 .

[26]  N. Knowlton,et al.  Sibling Species in Montastraea annularis, Coral Bleaching, and the Coral Climate Record , 1992, Science.

[27]  R. K. Koehn,et al.  Allozymes and morphometric characters of three species ofMytilus in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres , 1991 .

[28]  R. Kenchington,et al.  Guidelines for Establishing Marine Protected Areas , 1991 .

[29]  Leslie A. Real,et al.  The Sustainable Biosphere Initiative: An Ecological Research Agenda: A Report from the Ecological Society of America , 1991 .

[30]  R. Noss Sustainability and Wilderness , 1991 .

[31]  Christopher P. Dunn,et al.  Methods for analyzing temporal changes in landscape pattern , 1991 .

[32]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Quantitative methods in landscape ecology : the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity , 1991 .

[33]  C. Ball,et al.  Society of American Foresters , 1991 .

[34]  B. Riemann,et al.  Ecological consequences of dredging and bottom trawling in the Limfjord, Denmark. , 1991 .

[35]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Large‐Scale Perturbations: Opportunities for Innovation , 1990 .

[36]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Special Feature: Statistical Analysis of Ecological Response to Large‐Scale Perturbations , 1990 .

[37]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions and ecosystem processes : towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies , 1990 .

[38]  J. C. Gordon Forestry research: a mandate for change. , 1990 .

[39]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  The Georgia Landscape: A Changing Resource , 1990 .

[40]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Landscape changes in nine rural counties in Georgia. , 1990 .

[41]  M. Meijer,et al.  Biomanipulation Tool for Water Management , 1990, Developments in Hydrobiology.

[42]  W. Romme,et al.  Historical Perspective on the Yellowstone Fires of 1988A reconstruction of prehistoric fire history reveals that comparable fires occurred in the early 1700s , 1989 .

[43]  Norman L. Christensen,et al.  Interpreting the Yellowstone Fires of 1988Ecosystem responses and management implications , 1989 .

[44]  J. Carlton Man's role in changing the face of the ocean: biological invasions and implications for conservation of near-shore environments , 1989 .

[45]  J. Deming,et al.  Vent fauna on whale remains , 1989, Nature.

[46]  William L. Baker,et al.  Effect of scale and spatial heterogeneity on fire-interval distributions , 1989 .

[47]  W. Baker Landscape ecology and nature reserve design in the boundary waters canoe area, Minnesota , 1989 .

[48]  Allan Savory,et al.  Holistic Resource Management , 1988 .

[49]  David R. Foster,et al.  Disturbance history, community organization and vegetation dynamics of the old-growth pisgah forest, South-Western New Hampshire, U.S.A , 1988 .

[50]  W. Parton,et al.  Primary Production of the Central Grassland Region of the United States , 1988 .

[51]  J. Agee,et al.  Ecosystem management for parks and wilderness. , 1988 .

[52]  Austin B. Williams NEW MARINE DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS FROM WATERS INFLUENCED BY HYDROTHERMAL DISCHARGE, BRINE, AND HYDROCARBON SEEPAGE , 1988 .

[53]  P. Fulé,et al.  Restoration Ecology , 1987, Restoration & Management Notes.

[54]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance , 2011, Ecological Studies.

[55]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Concepts in Ecological Models , 1987 .

[56]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Living with Uncertainty in Resource Management , 1987 .

[57]  J. Frederick Grassle,et al.  The ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities , 1987 .

[58]  R. O'Neill A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .

[59]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[60]  Larry D. Harris,et al.  Nodes, networks, and MUMs: Preserving diversity at all scales , 1986 .

[61]  David J. Parsons,et al.  Natural fire management in National Parks , 1986 .

[62]  P. White,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1986 .

[63]  R. Myers Fire and the dynamic relationship between Florida sandhill and sand pine scrub vegetation , 1985 .

[64]  James T. Carlton,et al.  Transoceanic and interoceanic dispersal of coastal marine organisms: the biology of ballast water , 1985 .

[65]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  A Regional Landscape Approach to Maintain Diversity , 1983 .

[66]  J. Connell,et al.  On the Evidence Needed to Judge Ecological Stability or Persistence , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[67]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Disturbance and Ecosystems , 1983, Ecological Studies.

[68]  William H. Romme,et al.  Landscape Diversity: The Concept Applied to Yellowstone Park , 1982 .

[69]  W. Romme,et al.  FIRE AND LANDSCAPE DIVERSITY IN SUBALPINE FORESTS OF YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 1982 .

[70]  D. Wilcove,et al.  Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes , 1981 .

[71]  P. White,et al.  After preservation: Philisophical and practical problems of change☆ , 1980 .

[72]  R. Paine Food webs : linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure , 1980 .

[73]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem , 1980 .

[74]  R. Carpenter Using ecological knowledge for development planning , 1980 .

[75]  R. Paine,et al.  FOOD WEBS: LINKAGE, INTERACTION STRENGTH AND , 1980 .

[76]  J. Waterbury,et al.  Widespread occurrence of a unicellular, marine, planktonic, cyanobacterium , 1979, Nature.

[77]  J. Antonovics,et al.  Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations , 1978, Heredity.

[78]  J. Estes,et al.  Aleuts, Sea Otters, and Alternate Stable-State Communities , 1978, Science.

[79]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[80]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[81]  J. Connell,et al.  Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[82]  D. Sprugel Dynamic structure of wave-regenerated Abies balsamea forests in the north-eastern United States. , 1976 .

[83]  J. Grassle,et al.  Sibling species in the marine pollution indicator Capitella (polychaeta). , 1976, Science.

[84]  M. J. Sobel,et al.  Stability in Time-Varying Ecosystems , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[85]  J. Shapiro,et al.  Biomanipulation: an ecosystem approach to lake restoration , 1975 .

[86]  J. Sutherland,et al.  Multiple Stable Points in Natural Communities , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[87]  R. Paine,et al.  Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  W. Christie Changes in the Fish Species Composition of the Great Lakes , 1974 .

[89]  Bruce M. Kilgore The Ecological Role of Fire in Sierran Conifer Forests: Its Application to National Park Management , 1973, Quaternary Research.

[90]  F. Egerton Changing Concepts of the Balance of Nature , 1973, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[91]  A. Watt,et al.  Pattern and process in the plant community , 1947 .

[92]  Stephen Alfred Forbes,et al.  The Lake as a Microcosm , 1925 .

[93]  F. Clements Scientific Books: Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 2009 .

[94]  H. Wiley,et al.  The Carnegie Institution , 1902, Nature.

[95]  Henry C. Cowles,et al.  The Ecological Relations of the Vegetation on the Sand Dunes of Lake Michigan [Continued] , 1899, Botanical Gazette.

[96]  H. Guppy The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs , 1889, Nature.

[97]  Karl August Möbius,et al.  Die Auster und die Austernwirthschaft , 1877, Nature.

[98]  R. J. Pool,et al.  Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 1917 .