Event participant representations and the instrumental role: A cross-linguistic study
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Larson. On the double object construction , 1988 .
[2] Robert D. van Valin,et al. The case for “effector”: Case roles, agents, and agency revisited , 1996 .
[3] Adjunct infinitives in English , 1989 .
[4] Jürgen Bohnemeyer,et al. Morpholexical Transparency and the argument structure of verbs of cutting and breaking , 2007 .
[5] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[6] Matthew Whelpton,et al. Locality and Control with Infinitives of Result , 2002 .
[7] L. Rissman. Instrumental with and use: modality and implicature , 2011 .
[8] John C. Trueswell,et al. Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms , 2010 .
[9] David M. Perlmutter. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis , 1978 .
[10] H. Bergh,et al. Examples of Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects and with Binomial Data. , 2008 .
[11] A. Kratzer. Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .
[12] Andrew Rosta,et al. Cognitive space and linguistic case. , 2002 .
[13] Letitia R. Naigles,et al. Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.
[14] Edward Gibson,et al. Argumenthood and English Prepositional Phrase Attachment , 1999 .
[15] Judith Jarvis Thomson,et al. Acts and other events , 1977 .
[16] David R. Dowty. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .
[17] Dare A. Baldwin,et al. Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure , 2008, Cognition.
[18] From meaning to syntax - semantic roles and beyond , 2006 .
[19] J. Hopkins. Instrumental with and use : modality and implicature , 2012 .
[20] J. Fodor,et al. The Language of Thought , 1980 .
[21] Alec Marantz,et al. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .
[22] D. E. Breedlove,et al. General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology , 1973 .
[23] Steven P. Abney,et al. Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. , 1991 .
[24] Naoyuki Ono,et al. INSTRUMENTS: A CASE STUDY OF THE INTERFACE BETWEEN SYNTAX AND LEXICAL SEMANTICS , 1992 .
[25] Jeffrey Gruber. Studies in lexical relations , 1965 .
[26] C. Clifton,et al. Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[27] Miriam Butt,et al. The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors , 2004 .
[28] Robert Angelo Faraci,et al. Aspects of the grammar of infinitives and f̲o̲ṟ-phases. , 1974 .
[29] Kjell Johan Sæbø,et al. Necessary Conditions in a Natural Language , 2002 .
[30] James Higginbotham,et al. On Events in Linguistic Semantics , 2009 .
[31] L. Rissman. Periphrastic Use: a Modal Account of Instrumentality , 2011 .
[32] Beth Levin,et al. Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity* , 2010 .
[33] Lance J. Rips,et al. Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations , 1973 .
[34] Seizi Iwata. Locative Alternation: A lexical-constructional approach , 2008 .
[35] Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al. What with? The Anatomy of a (Proto)-Role , 2007, J. Semant..
[36] Stanley Peters,et al. On the Lumping Semantics of Counterfactuals , 2005, J. Semant..
[37] Ray Jackendoff,et al. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .
[38] B. Landau,et al. “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .
[39] L. Rissman. Instrumental with, locatum with and the argument/adjunct distinction , 2010 .
[40] David R. Dowty. The Dual Analysis of Adjuncts/Complements in Categorial Grammar , 2000 .
[41] Seizi Iwata. Locative alternation and two levels of verb meaning , 2005 .
[42] T. Shopen,et al. Language typology and syntactic description , 2013 .
[43] William Croft,et al. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .
[44] Todd R. Ferretti,et al. Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts , 1997 .
[45] Martin Haspelmath,et al. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison , 2003 .
[46] C. Fisher. Structural Limits on Verb Mapping: The Role of Analogy in Children's Interpretations of Sentences , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.
[47] K. McRae,et al. Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts , 2001 .
[48] S. J. Keyser,et al. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure , 2002 .
[49] Arnim von Stechow,et al. Anankastic conditionals again , 2006 .
[50] T. Parsons. Thematic relations and arguments , 1995 .
[51] Penelope Brown,et al. Same Argument Structure, Different Meanings: Learning ‘Put’ and ‘Look’ in Arrernte , 2007 .
[52] L. Gleitman. The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings , 2020, Sentence First, Arguments Afterward.
[53] Anna Wierzbicka,et al. Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and empirical findings , 2002 .
[54] K. Rayner,et al. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[55] Barbara Landau,et al. Abstract Morphosyntax in Two- and Three-Year-Old Children: Evidence from Priming , 2013 .
[56] Noam Chomsky,et al. Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar , 1972 .
[57] Friederike Moltmann. Parts and Wholes in Semantics , 1997 .
[58] Hagit Borer,et al. Structuring Sense Volume 2: The Normal Course of Events , 2005 .
[59] George Lakoff,et al. Instrumental Adverbs and the Concept of Deep Structure , 1968 .
[60] Holly P. Branigan,et al. Processing arguments and adjuncts in isolation and context : The case of by-phrase ambiguities in passives , 1998 .
[61] Terence Parsons,et al. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics , 1990 .
[62] David Pesetsky,et al. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades , 1994 .
[63] Aynat Rubinstein,et al. Roots of modality , 2012 .
[64] A. Goldberg. Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations , 2002 .
[65] Lyn Frazier,et al. Perspectives on sentence processing , 2015 .
[66] David R. Dowty. On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’ , 1989 .
[67] S. Krasikova. Sufficiency inference in anankastic conditionals , 2010 .
[68] R. Jackendoff. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .
[69] Douglas Roland,et al. Semantic similarity, predictability, and models of sentence processing , 2012, Cognition.
[70] Noam Chomsky,et al. वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .
[71] T. Vestergaard. Prepositional phrases and prepositional verbs: A study in grammatical function , 1977 .
[72] Alissa Melinger,et al. When is schematic participant information encoded? Evidence from eye-monitoring , 2002 .
[73] Emmon Bach,et al. Purpose Clauses and Control , 1982 .
[74] R. Jackendoff. The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory , 1987 .
[75] R. Oehrle,et al. Books Awaiting Review , 1984, CL.
[76] Charles J. Fillmore,et al. THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .
[77] B. Landau,et al. Using instruments to understand argument structure: Evidence for gradient representation , 2015, Cognition.
[78] A. Kratzer. An investigation of the lumps of thought , 1989 .
[79] Irene Heim,et al. Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .
[80] J. Elman,et al. Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.
[81] Charles Foster Jones. SYNTAX AND THEMATICS OF INFINITIVAL ADJUNCTS , 1985 .
[82] Beth Levin,et al. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .
[83] J. Snedeker,et al. Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children , 2008 .
[84] Anna Wierzbicka,et al. Contrastive semantics of physical activity verbs: 'Cutting' and 'chopping' in English, Polish and Japanese , 2009 .
[85] M. Dryer. Are Grammatical Relations Universal , 1997 .
[86] Ken Hale,et al. On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .
[87] Lucien Tesnière. Éléments de syntaxe structurale , 1959 .
[88] Gillian Ramchand,et al. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax , 2008 .
[89] Waltraud Paul,et al. The serial verb construction in Chinese: A tenacious myth and a Gordian knot , 2008 .
[90] L. Gleitman,et al. Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child , 1988 .
[91] Jon Nissenbaum,et al. Kissing Pedro Martinez: (Existential) Anankastic Conditionals and Rationale Clauses , 2005 .
[92] H. Borer. The normal course of events , 2005 .
[93] Charles Jones,et al. Purpose Clauses: Syntax, Thematics, and Semantics of English Purpose Constructions , 1991 .
[94] A. Goldberg. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .
[95] Elizabeth Cowper,et al. A concise introduction to syntactic theory : the government-binding approach , 1992 .
[96] Johan Rooryck,et al. Phrase structure and the lexicon , 1996 .
[97] Tom Werner. An Analysis of Existential Anankastics: How to Get There from Here , 2006 .
[98] R. Ratcliff,et al. The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in instrumental inference , 1981 .
[99] David Marr,et al. VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .
[100] Dan Jurafsky,et al. Probabilistic Modeling in Psycholinguistics: Linguistic Comprehension and Production , 2006 .
[101] James L. McClelland,et al. Constituent Attachment and Thematic Role Assignment in Sentence Processing: Influences of Content-Based Expectations , 1988 .
[102] S. Thompson,et al. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .
[103] C. Fillmore. The case for case reopened , 1977 .
[104] Mark C. Baker,et al. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .
[105] Andrew Radford,et al. Transformational Grammar: A First Course , 1988 .
[106] Ivan A. Sag,et al. Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .
[107] Scott DeLancey,et al. Event Construal and Case Role Assignment , 1991 .
[108] L. Talmy. Semantic Causative Types , 1976 .
[109] J. Trueswell,et al. The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.
[110] George Lakoff,et al. Criterion for Verb Phrase Constituency , 1966 .
[111] B. Levin,et al. Nonevent -er nominals: a probe into argument structure , 1988 .
[112] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Semantic role universals and argument linking: Theoretical, typological and psycholinguistic perspectives , 2006 .
[113] I. M. Schlesinger,et al. Instruments as agents: on the nature of semantic relations , 1989, Journal of Linguistics.
[114] Sandra A. Thompson,et al. Grammatical constructions : their form and meaning , 1999 .
[115] R. Langacker. Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .
[116] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Thematic roles and language comprehension , 1988 .
[117] L. Rissman. broke : Object deletion and manner-result complementarity * , 2022 .
[118] D. Nilsen,et al. The instrumental case in English : syntactic and semantic considerations , 1973 .
[119] Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al. Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.
[120] A. Kimball Romney,et al. SIBLING TERMINOLOGY AND CROSS-SEX BEHAVIOR. , 1967 .
[121] C. Guarneri. Cornell University Press , 1991 .
[122] Karen Wynn,et al. Individuation of Actions from Continuous Motion , 1998 .
[123] C. Thompson,et al. Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.
[124] Noam Chomsky,et al. Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .
[125] Anna Papafragou,et al. Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements , 2008, Cognition.
[126] Kai von Fintel,et al. How to Say Ought in Foreign: The Composition of Weak Necessity Modals , 2008 .
[127] Alexander Williams,et al. Complex causatives and verbal valence , 2005 .
[128] Damon Tutunjian,et al. Do We Need a Distinction between Arguments and Adjuncts? Evidence from Psycholinguistic Studies of Comprehension , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[129] S. Pinker. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .
[130] J. Elman. On the Meaning of Words and Dinosaur Bones: Lexical Knowledge Without a Lexicon , 2009, Cogn. Sci..
[131] Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al. Arguments for adjuncts , 2003, Cognition.
[132] Fabio Pianesi,et al. Events and Event Talk: An Introduction , 2000 .
[133] H. Gleitman,et al. Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar , 2003, Cognition.
[134] Beth Levin,et al. Argument Realization , 2005 .
[135] Julie E Boland,et al. Differences in the Timing of Implausibility Detection for Recipient and Instrument Prepositional Phrases , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[136] F. Moore. Cognitive development and the acquisition of language , 1973 .
[137] David L. Davidson,et al. The Logical Form of Action Sentences , 2001 .
[138] Penelope Brown,et al. Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability , 2008 .
[139] I. Heim. E-Type pronouns and donkey anaphora , 1990 .
[140] Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al. Linguistic vs. Conceptual Sources of Implicit Agents in Sentence Comprehension , 2000 .
[141] R. Jackendoff. Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics , 1996 .
[142] David R. Dowty. Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar , 1982 .
[143] J. K. Bock. Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[144] Sharon Lee Armstrong,et al. What some concepts might not be , 1983, Cognition.
[145] A. Majid,et al. The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking , 2008, Cognition.
[146] E. Rosch. ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PERCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC CATEGORIES1 , 1973 .
[147] E. Rosch. Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .