Event participant representations and the instrumental role: A cross-linguistic study

[1]  R. Larson On the double object construction , 1988 .

[2]  Robert D. van Valin,et al.  The case for “effector”: Case roles, agents, and agency revisited , 1996 .

[3]  Adjunct infinitives in English , 1989 .

[4]  Jürgen Bohnemeyer,et al.  Morpholexical Transparency and the argument structure of verbs of cutting and breaking , 2007 .

[5]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[6]  Matthew Whelpton,et al.  Locality and Control with Infinitives of Result , 2002 .

[7]  L. Rissman Instrumental with and use: modality and implicature , 2011 .

[8]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms , 2010 .

[9]  David M. Perlmutter Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis , 1978 .

[10]  H. Bergh,et al.  Examples of Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects and with Binomial Data. , 2008 .

[11]  A. Kratzer Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[12]  Andrew Rosta,et al.  Cognitive space and linguistic case. , 2002 .

[13]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[14]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Argumenthood and English Prepositional Phrase Attachment , 1999 .

[15]  Judith Jarvis Thomson,et al.  Acts and other events , 1977 .

[16]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[17]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  From meaning to syntax - semantic roles and beyond , 2006 .

[19]  J. Hopkins Instrumental with and use : modality and implicature , 2012 .

[20]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Language of Thought , 1980 .

[21]  Alec Marantz,et al.  No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .

[22]  D. E. Breedlove,et al.  General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology , 1973 .

[23]  Steven P. Abney,et al.  Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. , 1991 .

[24]  Naoyuki Ono,et al.  INSTRUMENTS: A CASE STUDY OF THE INTERFACE BETWEEN SYNTAX AND LEXICAL SEMANTICS , 1992 .

[25]  Jeffrey Gruber Studies in lexical relations , 1965 .

[26]  C. Clifton,et al.  Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Miriam Butt,et al.  The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors , 2004 .

[28]  Robert Angelo Faraci,et al.  Aspects of the grammar of infinitives and f̲o̲ṟ-phases. , 1974 .

[29]  Kjell Johan Sæbø,et al.  Necessary Conditions in a Natural Language , 2002 .

[30]  James Higginbotham,et al.  On Events in Linguistic Semantics , 2009 .

[31]  L. Rissman Periphrastic Use: a Modal Account of Instrumentality , 2011 .

[32]  Beth Levin,et al.  Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity* , 2010 .

[33]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations , 1973 .

[34]  Seizi Iwata Locative Alternation: A lexical-constructional approach , 2008 .

[35]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  What with? The Anatomy of a (Proto)-Role , 2007, J. Semant..

[36]  Stanley Peters,et al.  On the Lumping Semantics of Counterfactuals , 2005, J. Semant..

[37]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[38]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .

[39]  L. Rissman Instrumental with, locatum with and the argument/adjunct distinction , 2010 .

[40]  David R. Dowty The Dual Analysis of Adjuncts/Complements in Categorial Grammar , 2000 .

[41]  Seizi Iwata Locative alternation and two levels of verb meaning , 2005 .

[42]  T. Shopen,et al.  Language typology and syntactic description , 2013 .

[43]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[44]  Todd R. Ferretti,et al.  Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts , 1997 .

[45]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison , 2003 .

[46]  C. Fisher Structural Limits on Verb Mapping: The Role of Analogy in Children's Interpretations of Sentences , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  K. McRae,et al.  Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts , 2001 .

[48]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure , 2002 .

[49]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Anankastic conditionals again , 2006 .

[50]  T. Parsons Thematic relations and arguments , 1995 .

[51]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Same Argument Structure, Different Meanings: Learning ‘Put’ and ‘Look’ in Arrernte , 2007 .

[52]  L. Gleitman The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings , 2020, Sentence First, Arguments Afterward.

[53]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and empirical findings , 2002 .

[54]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Abstract Morphosyntax in Two- and Three-Year-Old Children: Evidence from Priming , 2013 .

[56]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[57]  Friederike Moltmann Parts and Wholes in Semantics , 1997 .

[58]  Hagit Borer,et al.  Structuring Sense Volume 2: The Normal Course of Events , 2005 .

[59]  George Lakoff,et al.  Instrumental Adverbs and the Concept of Deep Structure , 1968 .

[60]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Processing arguments and adjuncts in isolation and context : The case of by-phrase ambiguities in passives , 1998 .

[61]  Terence Parsons,et al.  Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics , 1990 .

[62]  David Pesetsky,et al.  Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades , 1994 .

[63]  Aynat Rubinstein,et al.  Roots of modality , 2012 .

[64]  A. Goldberg Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations , 2002 .

[65]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Perspectives on sentence processing , 2015 .

[66]  David R. Dowty On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’ , 1989 .

[67]  S. Krasikova Sufficiency inference in anankastic conditionals , 2010 .

[68]  R. Jackendoff Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[69]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Semantic similarity, predictability, and models of sentence processing , 2012, Cognition.

[70]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[71]  T. Vestergaard Prepositional phrases and prepositional verbs: A study in grammatical function , 1977 .

[72]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  When is schematic participant information encoded? Evidence from eye-monitoring , 2002 .

[73]  Emmon Bach,et al.  Purpose Clauses and Control , 1982 .

[74]  R. Jackendoff The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory , 1987 .

[75]  R. Oehrle,et al.  Books Awaiting Review , 1984, CL.

[76]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[77]  B. Landau,et al.  Using instruments to understand argument structure: Evidence for gradient representation , 2015, Cognition.

[78]  A. Kratzer An investigation of the lumps of thought , 1989 .

[79]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[80]  J. Elman,et al.  Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.

[81]  Charles Foster Jones SYNTAX AND THEMATICS OF INFINITIVAL ADJUNCTS , 1985 .

[82]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[83]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children , 2008 .

[84]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Contrastive semantics of physical activity verbs: 'Cutting' and 'chopping' in English, Polish and Japanese , 2009 .

[85]  M. Dryer Are Grammatical Relations Universal , 1997 .

[86]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[87]  Lucien Tesnière Éléments de syntaxe structurale , 1959 .

[88]  Gillian Ramchand,et al.  Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax , 2008 .

[89]  Waltraud Paul,et al.  The serial verb construction in Chinese: A tenacious myth and a Gordian knot , 2008 .

[90]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child , 1988 .

[91]  Jon Nissenbaum,et al.  Kissing Pedro Martinez: (Existential) Anankastic Conditionals and Rationale Clauses , 2005 .

[92]  H. Borer The normal course of events , 2005 .

[93]  Charles Jones,et al.  Purpose Clauses: Syntax, Thematics, and Semantics of English Purpose Constructions , 1991 .

[94]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[95]  Elizabeth Cowper,et al.  A concise introduction to syntactic theory : the government-binding approach , 1992 .

[96]  Johan Rooryck,et al.  Phrase structure and the lexicon , 1996 .

[97]  Tom Werner An Analysis of Existential Anankastics: How to Get There from Here , 2006 .

[98]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in instrumental inference , 1981 .

[99]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[100]  Dan Jurafsky,et al.  Probabilistic Modeling in Psycholinguistics: Linguistic Comprehension and Production , 2006 .

[101]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Constituent Attachment and Thematic Role Assignment in Sentence Processing: Influences of Content-Based Expectations , 1988 .

[102]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[103]  C. Fillmore The case for case reopened , 1977 .

[104]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[105]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Transformational Grammar: A First Course , 1988 .

[106]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[107]  Scott DeLancey,et al.  Event Construal and Case Role Assignment , 1991 .

[108]  L. Talmy Semantic Causative Types , 1976 .

[109]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[110]  George Lakoff,et al.  Criterion for Verb Phrase Constituency , 1966 .

[111]  B. Levin,et al.  Nonevent -er nominals: a probe into argument structure , 1988 .

[112]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Semantic role universals and argument linking: Theoretical, typological and psycholinguistic perspectives , 2006 .

[113]  I. M. Schlesinger,et al.  Instruments as agents: on the nature of semantic relations , 1989, Journal of Linguistics.

[114]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Grammatical constructions : their form and meaning , 1999 .

[115]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[116]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Thematic roles and language comprehension , 1988 .

[117]  L. Rissman broke : Object deletion and manner-result complementarity * , 2022 .

[118]  D. Nilsen,et al.  The instrumental case in English : syntactic and semantic considerations , 1973 .

[119]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[120]  A. Kimball Romney,et al.  SIBLING TERMINOLOGY AND CROSS-SEX BEHAVIOR. , 1967 .

[121]  C. Guarneri Cornell University Press , 1991 .

[122]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Individuation of Actions from Continuous Motion , 1998 .

[123]  C. Thompson,et al.  Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.

[124]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[125]  Anna Papafragou,et al.  Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements , 2008, Cognition.

[126]  Kai von Fintel,et al.  How to Say Ought in Foreign: The Composition of Weak Necessity Modals , 2008 .

[127]  Alexander Williams,et al.  Complex causatives and verbal valence , 2005 .

[128]  Damon Tutunjian,et al.  Do We Need a Distinction between Arguments and Adjuncts? Evidence from Psycholinguistic Studies of Comprehension , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[129]  S. Pinker Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[130]  J. Elman On the Meaning of Words and Dinosaur Bones: Lexical Knowledge Without a Lexicon , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[131]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Arguments for adjuncts , 2003, Cognition.

[132]  Fabio Pianesi,et al.  Events and Event Talk: An Introduction , 2000 .

[133]  H. Gleitman,et al.  Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar , 2003, Cognition.

[134]  Beth Levin,et al.  Argument Realization , 2005 .

[135]  Julie E Boland,et al.  Differences in the Timing of Implausibility Detection for Recipient and Instrument Prepositional Phrases , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[136]  F. Moore Cognitive development and the acquisition of language , 1973 .

[137]  David L. Davidson,et al.  The Logical Form of Action Sentences , 2001 .

[138]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability , 2008 .

[139]  I. Heim E-Type pronouns and donkey anaphora , 1990 .

[140]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Linguistic vs. Conceptual Sources of Implicit Agents in Sentence Comprehension , 2000 .

[141]  R. Jackendoff Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics , 1996 .

[142]  David R. Dowty Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar , 1982 .

[143]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[144]  Sharon Lee Armstrong,et al.  What some concepts might not be , 1983, Cognition.

[145]  A. Majid,et al.  The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking , 2008, Cognition.

[146]  E. Rosch ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PERCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC CATEGORIES1 , 1973 .

[147]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .