Long-term forecasting must be viewed as informative speculation about the future. It should be credited with relatively little scientific authenticity. At the present stage of theory and data, no magic methods can be expected to overcome the problem of satisfactory forecasting. Improvement, however, is certainly not just a question of putting more and more variables and more and more numbers into a computer. Methods which indicate how to cushion against uncertainty and methods which bring a greater awareness of options for the future are essential if we are to gain greater control over events. The hazy images of the long-term future which are generated by scenario and other forms of analysis form the guidelines within which short and especially medium-term choices must be made. But in the end we must recognise the inherent limitations of forecasting and forecasting methods and think of forecasting not so much as a method of prediction but as a contribution to tackling the future in a more integrated sense.
[1]
Christopher Freeman,et al.
World futures : the great debate
,
1979
.
[2]
Hans H. Landsberg,et al.
Resources in America's future.
,
1964
.
[3]
Mihajlo Mesarovic,et al.
Mankind at the Turning Point
,
1977,
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[4]
Herman Kahn,et al.
The Year 2000
,
1988,
AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.
[5]
Judith A. Hoffberg.
The Art of Anticipation.
,
1976
.
[6]
R Gillette,et al.
The limits to growth: hard sell for a computer view of doomsday.
,
1972,
Science.
[7]
Duane S. Elgin.
Alternative Futures for Environmental Policy Planning: 1975-2000.
,
1975
.
[8]
John G. Clark,et al.
Long-term forecasting in Western Europe
,
1975
.