Knowledge sharing and social capital in globally distributed execution

Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess whether social capital explains level and quality of knowledge sharing in globally distributed execution. More specifically, the study examined how knowledge sharing in combined European–Asian teams of a globally operating engineering and construction company was affected by these teams’ social capital. Design/methodology/approach Social capital was approached via constructs covering its structural, relational and cognitive dimensions. Data for 325 employees were collected via an online questionnaire and analysed using multiple regression models. Findings The analyses confirm that components of social capital offer powerful explanations of both the level and the quality of knowledge sharing. The study also found many differences in how social capital affects the level versus the quality of knowledge sharing and also in how it works in the European versus the Asian situations. No social capital factor appeared to significantly predict both level and quality knowledge sharing in the European and Asian situations alike. Originality/value This study is novel in empirically establishing how knowledge sharing in globally distributed execution is affected by teams’ social capital as an integrative construct bringing together individual and group characteristics.

[1]  Saonee Sarker,et al.  The impact of the nature of globally distributed work arrangement on work–life conflict and valence: the Indian GSD professionals’ perspective , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  John Roberts,et al.  Repairing Managerial Knowledge-Ability Over Distance , 2003 .

[3]  C. Gubbins,et al.  Metaphor Analysis as an Approach for Exploring Theoretical Concepts: The Case of Social Capital , 2009 .

[4]  Katarina Blomkvist,et al.  Knowledge Management in MNCs - the Importance of Subsidiary Transfer Performance , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  Brian Nicholson,et al.  Managing Knowledge Transfer in Offshore Software Development: The Role of Copresent and ICT-Based Interaction , 2009, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[6]  M.C.D.P. Weggeman,et al.  Kennismanagement : inrichting en besturing van kennisintensieve organisaties , 1997 .

[7]  Wilhelm Barner‐Rasmussen,et al.  Shifting the faultlines of language: A quantitative functional-level exploration of language use in MNC subsidiaries , 2011 .

[8]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Vincenzo Cavaliere,et al.  Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries' knowledge sharing behaviors? , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[11]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  Analyzing and Managing the Impact of Cultural Behavior Patterns on Social Capital in Multinational IT Project Teams , 2012, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[12]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[13]  Roslyn Larkin,et al.  Alternative control methods for exploiting subsidiary knowledge within an MNE: quantity versus quality , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  P. Buckley,et al.  A formal analysis of knowledge combination in multinational enterprises , 2004 .

[15]  Kun Chang Lee,et al.  KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[16]  K. Mäkelä,et al.  Interunit interaction contexts, interpersonal social capital, and the differing levels of knowledge sharing , 2009 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[18]  Sue Newell,et al.  Integrated collaboration across distributed sites: the perils of process and the promise of practice , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Relational Alignment in Offshore IS Outsourcing , 2009, MIS Q. Executive.

[21]  Sangjae Lee,et al.  Efficiency analysis of controls in EDI applications , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Yongbin Wei,et al.  Factors of stickiness in transfers of know-how between MNC units , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[23]  M. Wright,et al.  Human Mobility and International Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from High-tech Small and Medium Enterprises in an Emerging Market , 2010 .

[24]  Björn Ambos,et al.  Strong or invisible hands? – Managerial involvement in the knowledge sharing process of globally dispersed knowledge groups , 2014 .

[25]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[27]  S. Floyd,et al.  Routine microprocesses and capability learning in international new ventures , 2012 .

[28]  Chieh‐Peng Lin,et al.  Understanding Helping Intention and Its Antecedents among Instant Messaging Users , 2011, Online Inf. Rev..

[29]  Roger C. Mayer,et al.  Empowerment in veterinary clinics: the role of trust in delegation† , 2016 .

[30]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[31]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[32]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[34]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Interpersonal similarity and knowledge sharing within multinational organizations , 2012 .

[35]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Communities of practice and organizational performance , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[36]  Daniel Andriessen,et al.  Stuff or love? How metaphors direct our efforts to manage knowledge in organisations , 2008 .

[37]  Nathaniel Lupton,et al.  Organizational structure and knowledge-practice diffusion in the MNC , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[38]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[39]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[40]  Amar Gupta,et al.  Offshore-onsite subgroup dynamics in globally distributed teams , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[41]  John Child,et al.  Trust—the fundamental bond in global collaboration , 2001 .

[42]  S. Slater,et al.  Social capital in Japanese-Western alliances: understanding cultural effects , 2012 .

[43]  J. Bloodgood,et al.  Citizenship Behavior and The Creation of Social Capital in Organizations , 2002 .

[44]  K. Mearns,et al.  Perspectives on safety: The impact of group membership, work factors and trust on safety performance in UK and Norwegian drilling company employees , 2010 .

[45]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[46]  Jürgen Mühlbacher,et al.  On the different “worlds” of intra-organizational knowledge management: Understanding idiosyncratic variation in MNC cross-site knowledge-sharing practices , 2013, International business review.

[47]  J.G.J. Wassink,et al.  Boekbespreking van M. Weggeman, Kennismanagement: inrichting en besturing van kennisintensieve organisaties, Scriptum Management, Schiedam, 1997 , 1998 .

[48]  M. Tagliaventi,et al.  Work-Related Identities, Virtual Work Acceptance and the Development of Glocalized Work Practices in Globally Distributed Teams , 2010 .

[49]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration , 2008, MIS Q..