Structure-Based Ontology Evaluation

In order to build high quality ontologies, ontology evaluation technologies are needed. Now, most evaluation methods focus on the syntax evaluation which guarantees the correctness and completeness of ontology. The primary goal of these evaluation methods is to prevent applications from using inconsistent or incorrect ontologies. During last few years, some studies pay attention to the common meaningful structures among ontologies, which are analogous to each other. However, fewer studies concentrate on the internal structure of the ontology. Ontology, as the representation of knowledge, should have similar structure with domain knowledge. Furthermore, the ontology with well-organized structure will make it easy to understand, learn, apply, and reuse. Therefore, based on the statistics and the graph theory, this paper puts forward an improved ontology evaluation method, in which six properties are proposed to describe the characteristics of ontology structure. After discussing the algorithm of these six properties, we introduce an ontology development tool, in which the evaluation method has been integrated. This tool supports the entire ontology development process, and can help ontology developers refine the structure of ontology, and easily make a decision that which aspect of the ontology should be revised or improved

[1]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[2]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Ontology of Integration and Integration of Ontologies , 2001, Description Logics.

[3]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  A. Gomez-Perez,et al.  Some ideas and examples to evaluate ontologies , 1995, Proceedings the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications.

[5]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Building a chemical ontology using Methontology and the Ontology Design Environment , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[6]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine , 1983 .

[7]  Chun-Xia Zhang Representation and evaluation of hierarchical knowledge in formal ontologies , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.03EX693).

[8]  Knowledge Acquisition using Documents , Conceptual Graphs and a Semantically Structured Dictionary , 1995 .

[9]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  What are ontologies, and why do we need them? , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[10]  Michael Uschold,et al.  The Enterprise Ontology , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[11]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[12]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Why Evaluate Ontology Technologies? Because It Works! , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[13]  Hyunjang Kong,et al.  A new methodology for merging the heterogeneous domain ontologies based on the WordNet , 2005, International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices (NWeSP'05).

[14]  Liu Yang,et al.  Learning from ontologies for common meaningful structures , 2005, The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05).