Discourse Impairments Following Right Hemisphere Brain Damage: A Critical Review

Right hemisphere brain damage (RHD) rarely causes aphasias marked by clear and widespread failures of comprehension or extreme difficulty producing fluent speech. Nonetheless, subtle language comprehension deficits can occur following unilateral RHD. In this article, we review the empirical record on discourse function following right hemisphere damage, as well as relevant work on non-brain damaged individuals that focuses on right hemisphere function. The review is divided into four sections that focus on discourse processing, inferencing, humor, and non-literal language. While the exact role that the right hemisphere plays in language processing, and the exact way that the two cerebral hemispheres coordinate their linguistic processes are still open to debate, our review suggests that the right hemisphere plays a critical role in managing inferred or implied information by maintaining relevant information and/or suppressing irrelevant information. Deficits in one or both of these mechanisms may account for discourse deficits following RHD.

[1]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[2]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[3]  H. Gardner,et al.  Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Language.

[4]  Howard Gardner,et al.  The Contribution of the Right Hemisphere to the Organization of Paragraphs , 1983, Cortex.

[5]  C. Lombroso,et al.  Left and Right Temporal Lobe Epileptics: A Controlled Investigation of Some Psychological Differences , 1976, Epilepsia.

[6]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language , 1985 .

[7]  C. Petten,et al.  Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Murray Singer,et al.  Processes of inference during sentence encoding , 1979 .

[9]  Annette Baumgaertner,et al.  Inference generation during text comprehension by adults with right hemisphere brain damage: activation failure versus multiple activation. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  J. D. Saddy,et al.  Story arrangement ability in right brain-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[11]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  The mechanism of suppression: a component of general comprehension skill. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  C. Tompkins,et al.  Predictive inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  Marc D. Pell,et al.  The Effect of Compressed Speech on the Ability of Right-Hemisphere-Damaged Patients to Use Context , 2001, Cortex.

[14]  F. Viader,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during comprehension and speech (in cerebrally healthy subjects) , 1989, Brain and Language.

[15]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests , 1975 .

[16]  H. Gardner,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials , 1981, Brain and Language.

[17]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[18]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Discourse Representation in the Two Cerebral Hemispheres , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients , 1983, Brain and Language.

[20]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Idiom comprehension in children and adults with unilateral brain damage , 1999 .

[21]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Hemispheric differences in mnemonic processing: The effects of left hemisphere interpretation , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  A. Baumgaertner,et al.  Mechanisms of discourse comprehension impairment after right hemisphere brain damage: suppression in lexical ambiguity resolution. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[23]  Lee X. Blonder,et al.  Spontaneous humor among right hemisphere stroke survivors , 2005, Brain and Language.

[24]  D. A. Robertson,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Cognitive Process of Mapping During Discourse Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[25]  Patrizia Baraldi,et al.  Humor Comprehension and Appreciation: An fMRI Study , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  David Caplan,et al.  The Use of Contextual Information Related to General World Knowledge by Right Brain-Damaged Individuals in Pronoun Resolution , 1997, Brain and Language.

[27]  Debra L. Long,et al.  The propositional structure of discourse in the two cerebral hemispheres , 2005, Brain and Language.

[28]  David Caplan,et al.  The Use of Contextual Information by Right Brain-Damaged Individuals in the Resolution of Ambiguous Pronouns , 1997, Brain and Language.

[29]  Murray Singer,et al.  The role of case‐filling inferences in the coherence of brief passages∗ , 1980 .

[30]  A. Baumgaertner,et al.  Mechanisms of discourse comprehension impairment after right hemisphere brain damage: suppression in inferential ambiguity resolution. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[31]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[32]  James E. Hoffman,et al.  Individual Differences in Inference Generation: An ERP Analysis , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  M. Hough Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain-damage: Theme organization , 1990, Brain and Language.

[34]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming , 1988 .

[35]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  Interpreting Metaphors and Idioms: Some Effects of Context on Comprehension. Technical Report No. 93. , 1978 .

[36]  Rocky Ross,et al.  Mental models , 2004, SIGA.

[37]  M. Jung-Beeman Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Understanding metaphors: Is the right hemisphere uniquely involved? , 2007, Brain and Language.

[39]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992 .

[40]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  M. Blake,et al.  Contextual bias and predictive inferencing in adults with and without right hemisphere brain damage , 2005 .

[42]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  D. Lancker,et al.  Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients , 1987, Brain and Language.

[44]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Assessment of Story Comprehension Deficits After Brain Damage , 2005, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[45]  Marie T. Banich,et al.  The Divided Visual Field Technique in Laterality and Interhemispheric Integration , 2003 .

[46]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992, Psychological review.

[47]  G. Hynd,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in normal readers: bilateral activation with narrative text. , 1989, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[48]  Shari R. Baum,et al.  Processing homonymy and polysemy: Effects of sentential context and time-course following unilateral brain damage , 2005, Brain and Language.

[49]  E. Ross,et al.  Neurology of affective prosody and its functional–anatomic organization in right hemisphere , 2008, Brain and Language.

[50]  M. Beeman,et al.  Complementary Right- and Left-Hemisphere Language Comprehension , 1998 .

[51]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  The Role of the Right Cerebral Hemisphere in Processing Novel Metaphoric Expressions: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Story processing in right-hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[53]  H. Gardner,et al.  The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  P. Deyn,et al.  Adult Crossed Aphasia in Dextrals Revisited , 2004, Cortex.

[55]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Making sense of discourse: An fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences , 2006, NeuroImage.

[56]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Metaphor and Thought: How metaphors work , 1993 .

[57]  Y. Grodzinsky The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[58]  Roger Wales,et al.  An investigation of the ability to process inferences in language following right hemisphere brain damage , 1986, Brain and Language.

[59]  Penelope S. Myers,et al.  Inference Failure: The Underlying Impairment in Right-Hemisphere Communication Disorders , 1991 .

[60]  M. Cannito,et al.  Inferential abilities of normal and right hemisphere damaged adults. , 1995, Journal of communication disorders.

[61]  R. Brookshire,et al.  Comprehension of main ideas and details in coherent and noncoherent discourse by aphasic and nonaphasic listeners , 1984, Brain and Language.

[62]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Script knowledge in right hemisphere-damaged and in normal elderly adults , 1987, Brain and Language.

[63]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes , 2007, Brain and Language.

[64]  Sally Byng,et al.  Sentence processing deficits: Theory and therapy , 1988 .

[65]  A. Braun,et al.  The neural organization of discourse: an H2 15O-PET study of narrative production in English and American sign language. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[66]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Right and Left Hemisphere Cooperation for Drawing Predictive and Coherence Inferences during Normal Story Comprehension , 2000, Brain and Language.

[67]  M. Erb,et al.  Neural correlates of metaphor processing. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[68]  M. Gernsbacher Mechanisms that improve referential access , 1989, Cognition.

[69]  Wiltrud Fassbinder,et al.  A different story on “Theory of Mind” deficit in adults with right hemisphere brain damage , 2008, Aphasiology.

[70]  K. Baynes,et al.  The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: An individual differences investigation , 2007, Brain and Language.

[71]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[72]  R. GibbsJr. Literal meaning and psychological theory , 1984 .

[73]  W. Kintsch The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[74]  Shari R. Baum,et al.  Research note: The ability of individuals with right-hemisphere damage to use context under conditions of focused and divided attention , 2005, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[75]  Seana Coulson,et al.  Right Hemisphere Activation of Joke-related Information: An Event-related Brain Potential Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[76]  Yves Joanette,et al.  Narrative Discourse in Neurologically Impaired and Normal Aging Adults , 1999 .

[77]  R. Brookshire,et al.  Comprehension of directly and indirectly stated main ideas and details in discourse by brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged listeners , 1984, Brain and Language.

[78]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[79]  Connie A. Tompkins,et al.  Inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage: An analysis of conflicting results , 2000 .

[80]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The process of spoken word recognition: An introduction , 1987, Cognition.

[81]  F. Happé,et al.  Acquired mind-blindness following frontal lobe surgery? A single case study of impaired ‘theory of mind’ in a patient treated with stereotactic anterior capsulotomy , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[82]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[83]  Connie A. Tompkins,et al.  Characterising comprehension difficulties after right brain damage: Attentional demands of suppression function , 2002 .

[84]  Shari R. Baum,et al.  On-Line Evidence for Context Use by Right-Brain-Damaged Patients , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[85]  Jiang Xu,et al.  Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[86]  Wiltrud Fassbinder,et al.  Activation and maintenance of peripheral semantic features of unambiguous words after right hemisphere brain damage in adults , 2008, Aphasiology.

[87]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[88]  Michael Siegal,et al.  Theory of Mind and Pragmatic Understanding Following Right Hemisphere Damage , 1996, Brain and Language.

[89]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Sensitivity to lexical denotation and connotation in brain-damaged patients: A double dissociation? , 1984, Brain and Language.

[90]  P. Pietrini,et al.  Where the brain appreciates the moral of a story. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[91]  Shari R Baum,et al.  Sensitivity to local sentence context information in lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from left- and right-hemisphere-damaged individuals , 2003, Brain and Language.

[92]  M. Beeman Semantic Processing in the Right Hemisphere May Contribute to Drawing Inferences from Discourse , 1993, Brain and Language.

[93]  T. Hendler,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in processing nonsalient metaphorical meanings: Application of Principal Components Analysis to fMRI data , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[94]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  Text comprehension after brain injury: left prefrontal lesions affect inference processes. , 2002, Neuropsychology.

[95]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[96]  Shari R. Baum,et al.  Unilateral brain damage effects on processing homonymous and polysemous words , 2005, Brain and Language.

[97]  H. Brownell,et al.  Acquired `theory of mind' impairments following stroke , 1999, Cognition.

[98]  J. Grafman,et al.  Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[99]  A. Baumgaertner,et al.  Working memory and inference revision in brain-damaged and normally aging adults. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[100]  Brandon R. Schrand Works Cited , 1991, Bach's Cycle, Mozart's Arrow.