Comparison of the intracellular itineraries of insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin and their receptors in Rat-1 fibroblasts.

In this study we have compared the intracellular itineraries of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and their receptors subsequent to ligand internalization in rat fibroblasts. We found that the endocytic rate constant is approximately 3 times as high for insulin as for IGF-I. The dissociation of internalized ligand from its receptor was monitored by the ability of ligand-receptor complexes to precipitate in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG). Insulin loses its ability to precipitate with PEG more rapidly than IGF-I. After 60 min, less than 10% of the intracellular insulin remains PEG precipitable, whereas 44% of intracellular IGF-I stays PEG precipitable. Ligand degradation was determined by precipitation with trichloroacetic acid (TCA). Insulin degradation after internalization is more rapid compared with IGF-I degradation; after 2 h, 80% of intracellular IGF-I, in contrast to only 30% of intracellular insulin, remains intact. We measured retroendocytosis of insulin and IGF-I by assessing the amount of internalized ligand that was subsequently released from the cells. When analyzing released ligand by TCA precipitation, we found that 25% of insulin and 53% of IGF-I were TCA precipitable. After 120 min, only 16% of insulin and 43% of IGF-I remained intracellular. To provide insight into a possible mechanism that prevents IGF-I from being subjected to the same degree of degradation as insulin, we studied the effect of pH on IGF-I and insulin binding. We found IGF-I binding to be less sensitive to decreases in pH compared with insulin binding. Therefore, it is likely that after internalization, IGF-I does not dissociate from its intracellular receptor as easily as insulin in the acidifying endosome and, therefore, can return to the cell surface via a recycling receptor. In summary, we have observed distinct differences in the intracellular itineraries of IGF-I and insulin and their receptors. IGF-I internalization and degradation proceed less efficiently than insulin internalization, and IGF-I is preferentially targeted into a retroendocytotic pathway in contrast to insulin, which primarily undergoes lysosomal degradation. The differential effect of pH on ligand binding to these structurally related hormone receptors may account for the quantitatively distinct ligand trafficking events.

[1]  J. Olefsky,et al.  Tyrosine kinase-defective insulin receptors undergo insulin-induced microaggregation but do not concentrate in coated pits. , 1991, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  V. Brown,et al.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms of receptor-mediated endocytosis. , 1991, DNA and cell biology.

[3]  H. Wiley,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the endocytic system involved in hormone-induced receptor internalization. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  F. Maxfield,et al.  Acidification of morphologically distinct endosomes in mutant and wild- type Chinese hamster ovary cells , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  M. Rechler,et al.  Hormonal regulation of human growth. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  E. Froesch,et al.  Insulin-like growth factors. Studies in diabetics with and without retinopathy. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Kitabchi,et al.  Early Detection of Degraded A14-125I-Insulin in Human Fibroblasts by the Use of High Performance Liquid Chromatography , 1983, Diabetes.

[8]  Joseph L. Goldstein,et al.  Recycling receptors: The round-trip itinerary of migrant membrane proteins , 1983, Cell.

[9]  H. Lodish,et al.  Intracellular site of asialoglycoprotein receptor-ligand uncoupling: Double-label immunoelectron microscopy during receptor-mediated endocytosis , 1983, Cell.

[10]  R. Klausner,et al.  Receptor-mediated endocytosis of transferrin and the uptake of fe in K562 cells: identification of a nonlysosomal acidic compartment. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  H. Wiley,et al.  The endocytotic rate constant. A cellular parameter for quantitating receptor-mediated endocytosis. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  P. Schlesinger,et al.  Mannose-specific endocytosis receptor of alveolar macrophages: demonstration of two functionally distinct intracellular pools of receptor and their roles in receptor recycling , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  M. Brown,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies to the low density lipoprotein receptor as probes for study of receptor-mediated endocytosis and the genetics of familial hypercholesterolemia. , 1981, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  G. Coetzee,et al.  Retro-endocytosis of low density lipoprotein by cultured bovine aortic smooth muscle cells. , 1981, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[15]  M. Brown,et al.  Characterization of the low density lipoprotein receptor in membranes prepared from human fibroblasts. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  I Mellman,et al.  Acidification of the endocytic and exocytic pathways. , 1986, Annual review of biochemistry.

[17]  C. Kahn The molecular mechanism of insulin action. , 1985, Annual review of medicine.

[18]  C. Ockleford,et al.  Supramolecular cytology of coated vesicles. , 1984, International review of cytology.