Facial first impressions from another angle: How social judgements are influenced by changeable and invariant facial properties

First impressions made to photographs of faces can depend as much on momentary characteristics of the photographed image (within-person variability) as on consistent properties of the face of the person depicted (between-person variability). Here, we examine two important sources of within-person variability: emotional expression and viewpoint. We find more within-person variability than between-person variability for social impressions of key traits of trustworthiness, dominance, and attractiveness, which index the main dimensions in theoretical models of facial impressions. The most important source of this variability is the emotional expression of the face, but the viewpoint of the photograph also affects impressions and modulates the effects of expression. For example, faces look most trustworthy with a happy expression when they are facing the perceiver, compared to when they are facing elsewhere, whereas the opposite is true for anger and disgust. Our findings highlight the integration of these different sources of variability in social impression formation.

[1]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Personality judgments from everyday images of faces , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[2]  R. Meijer,et al.  A trial studying approach to predict college achievement , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[3]  Jonathan B Freeman,et al.  Static and Dynamic Facial Cues Differentially Affect the Consistency of Social Evaluations , 2015, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  Andrew W Young,et al.  Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated. , 2015, British journal of psychology.

[5]  K. Guo,et al.  Face in profile view reduces perceived facial expression intensity: an eye-tracking study. , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Peter Mende-Siedlecki,et al.  Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  Friederike Funk,et al.  Social attributions from faces bias human choices , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  A. Young,et al.  Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial Trustworthiness Judgments in Children with ASD Are Modulated by Happy and Angry Emotional Cues , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model , 2013, Cognition.

[11]  Deva Ramanan,et al.  Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  H. Hecht,et al.  Judging Body Weight from Faces: The Height—Weight Illusion , 2012, Perception.

[13]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[14]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial Attractiveness Ratings from Video-Clips and Static Images Tell the Same Story , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  A. Burton,et al.  Mental representations of familiar faces. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[16]  Jessica L. Tracy,et al.  Four Models of Basic Emotions: A Review of Ekman and Cordaro, Izard, Levenson, and Panksepp and Watt , 2011 .

[17]  Darren Burke,et al.  Social Judgments are Influenced By Both Facial Expression and Direction of Eye Gaze , 2011 .

[18]  Christopher D. Watkins,et al.  Individual differences in dominance perception: Dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance , 2010 .

[19]  Christopher D. Watkins,et al.  Taller men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men , 2010 .

[20]  A. Little,et al.  Interactions among the Effects of Head Orientation, Emotional Expression, and Physical Attractiveness on Face Preferences , 2010, Perception.

[21]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Personality in Perspective: Judgmental Consistency across Orientations of the Face , 2009, Perception.

[22]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Portraits made to measure: manipulating social judgments about individuals with a statistical face model. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[23]  A. Little,et al.  Integrating Gaze Direction and Sexual Dimorphism of Face Shape When Perceiving the Dominance of Others , 2009, Perception.

[24]  Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al.  Brain responses strongly correlate with Weibull image statistics when processing natural images. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[25]  Jonathan Westley Peirce,et al.  Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy , 2008, Front. Neuroinform..

[26]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  I. Penton-Voak,et al.  Attractiveness judgements of individuals vary across emotional expression and movement conditions , 2008 .

[28]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Knowing Who's Boss: fMRI and ERP Investigations of Social Dominance Perception , 2008, Group processes & intergroup relations : GPIR.

[29]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  J. Fellous,et al.  Impressions Mediated by Babyfaceness? Evidence From Connectionist Modeling , 2007 .

[31]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Higher-level mechanisms detect facial symmetry , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.

[33]  Joann M. Montepare,et al.  The Contribution of Emotion Perceptions and Their Overgeneralizations to Trait Impressions , 2003 .

[34]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  The Many Faces of a Neutral Face: Head Tilt and Perception of Dominance and Emotion , 2003 .

[35]  Avi Chaudhuri,et al.  Reassessing the 3/4 view effect in face recognition , 2002, Cognition.

[36]  Roy Porter,et al.  The Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL , 2000, Medical History.

[37]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint , 1998, Vision Research.

[40]  P. Schyns,et al.  Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition , 1997, Cognition.

[41]  B. Knutson Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences , 1996 .

[42]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape , 1996, Vision Research.

[43]  H. Reis,et al.  What is smiling is beautiful and good , 1990 .

[44]  V. Bruce,et al.  The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition , 1987 .

[45]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[46]  S. Sussman,et al.  You're Only as Pretty as You Feel: Facial Expression as a Determinant of Physical Attractiveness , 1984 .

[47]  Frances L. Krouse Effects of pose, pose change, and delay on face recognition performance. , 1981 .

[48]  U. Hess,et al.  Emotional versus neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness. , 2009, Emotion.

[49]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  The role of facial expression in person perception. , 2008 .

[50]  Em Tansey,et al.  The MRC Applied Psychology Unit, vol. 16. , 2003 .