Improving the Distinction between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: The Value of Sonographic Texture Analysis

To improve the ability of ultrasound to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions, we used quantitative analysis of ultrasound image texture. Eight cancers, 22 cysts, 28 fibroadenomata, and 22 fibrocystic nodules were studied. The true nature of each lesion was determined by aspiration (for some cysts) or by open biopsy. Analysis of image texture was performed on digitized video output from the ultrasound scanner using fractal analysis and statistical texture analysis methods. The most useful features were those derived from co-occurrence matrices of the images. Using two features together (contrast of a co-occurrence matrix taken in an oblique direction, and correlation of a co-occurrence matrix taken in the horizontal direction), it was possible to exclude 78% of fibroadenomata, 73% of cysts, and 91% of fibrocystic nodules while maintaining 100% sensitivity for cancer. These findings suggest that ultrasonic image texture analysis is a simple way to markedly reduce the number of benign lesion biopsies without missing additional cancers.

[1]  Béla Julesz,et al.  Visual Pattern Discrimination , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  M. R. Mickey,et al.  Estimation of Error Rates in Discriminant Analysis , 1968 .

[3]  William S. Meisel,et al.  Computer-oriented approaches to pattern recognition , 1972 .

[4]  T. Kobayashi,et al.  Gray-scale echography for breast cancer. , 1977, Radiology.

[5]  E. Kelly-Fry,et al.  Ultrasound visualization of the breast in symptomatic patients. , 1980, Radiology.

[6]  W Swindell,et al.  Breast tissue classification using diagnostic ultrasound and pattern recognition techniques: II. Experimental results. , 1983, Ultrasonic imaging.

[7]  L. Tabár,et al.  Teaching atlas of mammography. , 1983, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband.

[8]  W. Swindell,et al.  Breast tissue classification using diagnostic ultrasound and pattern recognition techniques: I. Methods of pattern recognition. , 1983, Ultrasonic imaging.

[9]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of computerized B‐scan texture analysis and conventional ultrasonography in diffuse parenchymal and malignant liver disease , 1985, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[10]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion as a figure of merit for the optimization of imaging systems , 1986 .

[11]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Pattern recognition methods for optimizing multivariate tissue signatures in diagnostic ultrasound. , 1986, Ultrasonic imaging.

[12]  S. Kay,et al.  Fractional Brownian Motion: A Maximum Likelihood Estimator and Its Application to Image Texture , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  L. Bassett,et al.  Automated and hand-held breast US: effect on patient management. , 1987, Radiology.

[14]  M. E. Lee,et al.  Role of direct contact, real-time breast ultrasound: one year's experience. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  Size of breast cancer on ultrasonography, cut-surface of resected specimen, and palpation. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Direct-contact B-scan sonomammography--an aid to X-ray mammography. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  B. Fornage,et al.  Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. , 1989, Radiology.

[18]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Quantitative ultrasonic detection and classification of diffuse liver disease. Comparison with human observer performance. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[19]  M. Fox,et al.  Fractal feature analysis and classification in medical imaging. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[20]  V. Murmis,et al.  Texture analysis ultrasonic mammography as an aid in breast cancer diagnosis , 1989 .

[21]  V. Jackson The role of US in breast imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[22]  J. Gisvold Imaging of the breast: techniques and results. , 1990, Mayo Clinic proceedings.