What's Hot? Estimating Country-specific Artist Popularity

Predicting artists that are popular in certain regions of the world is a well desired task, especially for the music industry. Also the cosmopolitan and cultural-aware music aficionado is likely be interested in which music is currently “hot” in other parts of the world. We therefore propose four approaches to determine artist popularity rankings on the country-level. To this end, we mine the following data sources: page counts from Web search engines, user posts on Twitter, shared folders on the Gnutella file sharing network, and playcount data from last.fm. We propose methods to derive artist rankings based on these four sources and perform cross-comparison of the resulting rankings via overlap scores. We further elaborate on the advantages and disadvantages of all approaches as they yield interestingly diverse results.

[1]  Alistair Moffat,et al.  Exploring the similarity space , 1998, SIGF.

[2]  M. KleinbergJon Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment , 1999 .

[3]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[4]  Matei Ripeanu,et al.  Peer-to-peer architecture case study: Gnutella network , 2001, Proceedings First International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing.

[5]  Daniel P. W. Ellis,et al.  The Quest for Ground Truth in Musical Artist Similarity , 2002, ISMIR.

[6]  Steve Lawrence,et al.  Inferring Descriptions and Similarity for Music from Community Metadata , 2002, ICMC.

[7]  Daniel P. W. Ellis,et al.  Toward Evaluation Techniques for Music Similarity , 2003, SIGIR 2003.

[8]  Daniel P. W. Ellis,et al.  A Large-Scale Evaluation of Acoustic and Subjective Music-Similarity Measures , 2004, Computer Music Journal.

[9]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Towards the self-annotating web , 2004, WWW '04.

[10]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Learning by googling , 2004, SKDD.

[11]  François Pachet,et al.  "The way it Sounds": timbre models for analysis and retrieval of music signals , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[12]  Peter Knees,et al.  A WEB-BASED APPROACH TO ASSESSING ARTIST SIMILARITY USING CO-OCCURRENCES , 2005 .

[13]  Peter Knees,et al.  Assigning and Visualizing Music Genres by Web-based Co-Occurrence Analysis , 2006, ISMIR.

[14]  Jan H. M. Korst,et al.  Web-Based Artist Categorization , 2006, ISMIR.

[15]  Peter Knees,et al.  Investigating Web-Based Approaches to Revealing Prototypical Music Artists in Genre Taxonomies , 2007, 2006 1st International Conference on Digital Information Management.

[16]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[17]  Thierry Bertin-Mahieux,et al.  Autotagging Music Using Supervised Machine Learning , 2007, ISMIR.

[18]  D. Gruhl,et al.  Artist Ranking Through Analysis of On-line Community Comments , 2008 .

[19]  François Pachet,et al.  Hit Song Science Is Not Yet a Science , 2008, ISMIR.

[20]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  Spotting out emerging artists using geo-aware analysis of P2P query strings , 2008, KDD.

[21]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  Song Clustering Using Peer-to-Peer Co-occurrences , 2009, 2009 11th IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia.

[22]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  Song Ranking based on Piracy in Peer-to-Peer Networks , 2009, ISMIR.

[23]  Peter Knees,et al.  Context-based Music Similarity Estimation , 2009 .

[24]  Peter Knees,et al.  Augmenting Text-based Music Retrieval with Audio Similarity: Advantages and Limitations , 2009, ISMIR.