Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the opinions of Norwegian dental practitioners regarding the use of solid state sensor and storage phosphor (SP) detectors for intra-oral radiography. METHODS A questionnaire received from 2199 dentists 309 (219 male, 86 female, four unknown) confirmed the use of digital radiography in their practices. RESULTS Sixty-one per cent of dentists used a SP and 35% a sensor system; four (1.3%) used both. Approximately 50% of dentists had experienced technical problems and 33% had needed repairs. Almost all dentists stored their images on the hard disk (>97%) and 81% made a daily back-up. More sensor than SP users found difficulty with the positioning holder. Two-thirds of dentists reported digital image quality was the same or better than film. More Digora (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) users reported better image quality than Denoptix (Gendex, Milan, Italy) or Digident (Digident, Nesher, Israel) users. Mean reduction in exposure time was 55% (range 2-90%), although 17 dentists stated that no reduction was achieved. Approximately half of the sensor users also used film and 38% of the SP users. Film was used more often for bitewing examination by the sensor users (27%) than by the SP users (4%). Mean time saved by the sensor users was 36 min/day (range 10-120) and by the SP users 25 min/day (range 5-120). CONCLUSIONS The majority of dentists felt that digital image quality was the same or better than film and exposure and examination times were reduced. However, technical problems and repairs were common.

[1]  M Russell,et al.  Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography. , 1993, Caries research.

[2]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: an in vitro study. , 1995, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[3]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system. , 1996, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[4]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: comparison with conventional radiography. , 1996, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[5]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film. , 1996, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  G C Sanderink,et al.  Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths. , 1996, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[7]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intra-oral digital systems. , 1996, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[8]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems. , 1996, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Effect of exposure time on in vitro caries diagnosis using the Digora system. , 1997, European journal of oral sciences.

[10]  Y. Hayakawa,et al.  Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems. , 1997, The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College.

[11]  Y Hayakawa,et al.  Intraoral radiographic storage phosphor image mean pixel values and signal-to-noise ratio: effects of calibration. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[12]  C H Versteeg,et al.  An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device. , 1998, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[13]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Patient discomfort and cross-infection control in bitewing examination with a storage phosphor plate and a CCD-based sensor. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[14]  K. Tokumori,et al.  Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems. , 1999, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[15]  A. Wenzel.  Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office. , 1999, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[16]  M Wakoh,et al.  Suitability of the general-purpose graphic printer as an image output device for digital dental x-ray images. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[17]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography. , 2000, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[18]  T. A. Larheim,et al.  Approximal Caries Depth Assessment with Storage Phosphor versus Film Radiography , 2000, Caries Research.

[19]  K Kuroyanagi,et al.  Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality. , 2000, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[20]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Decision criteria and characteristics of Norwegian general dental practitioners selecting digital radiography. , 2001, Dento maxillo facial radiology.