Trade theory and trade facts

This paper quantitatively tests the "new trade theory" based on product differen-tiation, increasing returns, and imperfect competition. We employ a standard model, which allows both changes in the distribution of income among industrialized coun-tries, emphasized by Helpman and Krugman (1985), and nonhomothetic preferences, emphasized by Markusen (1986), to effect trade directions and volumes. In addition, we generalize the model to allow changes in relative prices to have large effects. We test the model by calibrating it to 1990 data and then "backcasting" to 1961 to see what changes in crucial variables between 1961 and 1990 are predicted by the theory. The results show that, although the model is capable of explaining much of the increased concentration of trade among industrialized countries, it is not capable of explaining the enormous increase in the ratio of trade to income. Our analysis suggests that it is policy changes, rather than the elements emphasized in the new trade theory, that have been the most significant determinants of the increase in trade volume.

[1]  E. Helpman International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition: A Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin approach , 1981 .

[2]  David Hummels,et al.  Alternative Hypotheses and the Volume of Trade: Evidence on the Extent of Specialization , 1999 .

[3]  A. Dixit,et al.  Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity , 1977 .

[4]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries , 1987 .

[5]  Kei-Mu Yi,et al.  Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade? , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Paul Krugman,et al.  Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences , 1995 .

[7]  M. Spence Product Selection, Fixed Costs, and Monopolistic Competition , 1976 .

[8]  C. Morrison Productive and Financial Performance in U. S. Manufacturing Industries: An Integrated Structural Approach , 1993 .

[9]  J. Harrigan OECD imports and trade barriers in 1983 , 1993 .

[10]  J. Levinsohn,et al.  Monopolistic Competition and International Trade: Reconsidering the Evidence , 1993 .

[11]  Keith E. Maskus,et al.  International Trade: Theory and Evidence , 1994 .

[12]  A. Yeats,et al.  Trends in nontariff barriers of developed countries, 1966—1986 , 1990 .

[13]  Eric van Wincoop,et al.  How big are potential welfare gains from international risksharing , 1999 .

[14]  L. Tesar,et al.  Tastes and Technology in a Two-Country Model of the Business Cycle: Explaining International Comovements , 1990 .

[15]  Daniel Trefler,et al.  International Factor Price Differences: Leontief was Right! , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Linda Hunter,et al.  The contribution of nonhomothetic preferences to trade , 1991 .

[17]  Scott L. Baier,et al.  The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity , 2001 .

[18]  Patrick J. Kehoe,et al.  A Primer on Static Applied General Equilibrium Models , 1994 .

[19]  T. Kehoe An Evaluation of the Performance of Applied General Equilibrium Models of the Impact of NAFTA , 2003 .

[20]  H. Bruton A Reconsideration of Import Substitution , 1998 .

[21]  David Hummels,et al.  Toward a Geography of Trade Costs , 1999, GTAP Working Paper.

[22]  S. Kuznets Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: X. Level and Structure of Foreign Trade: Long-Term Trends , 1967, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[23]  Cristina Echevarria,et al.  Changes in Sectoral Composition Associated with Economic Growth , 1997 .

[24]  P. Krugman Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade , 1979 .

[25]  Dirk Pilat,et al.  Mark-Up Ratios in Manufacturing Industries: Estimates for 14 OECD Countries , 1996 .

[26]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy , 1998 .

[27]  Alan V. Deardorff Chapter 10 Testing trade theories and predicting trade flows , 1984 .