Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs

[1]  T. Allen,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .

[2]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[3]  Andy Neely,et al.  Academic entrepreneurship: What are the factors shaping the capacity of academic researchers to identify and exploit entrepreneurial opportunities? , 2009 .

[4]  R. Noll,et al.  Privatizing public research. , 1994, Scientific American.

[5]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value , 2006 .

[6]  H. Etzkowitz.  Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science , 1983, Minerva.

[7]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[8]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[9]  W. Baumol.  The Free-Market Innovation Machine - Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism , 2002 .

[10]  Tom Coupé,et al.  Science Is Golden: Academic R&D and University Patents , 2003 .

[11]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  Catching up or standing still? , 2004 .

[12]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Does research organization influence academic production?: Laboratory level evidence from a large European university , 2004 .

[13]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[14]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[15]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Sources of Industrial Leadership , 1999 .

[16]  Mike Wright,et al.  Mid-range universities' linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries , 2008 .

[17]  David F. Noble,et al.  America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism by David F. Noble (review) , 1977 .

[18]  Roger G. Noll.  Challenges to research universities , 1998 .

[19]  Chiara Franzoni,et al.  Is academic patenting detrimental to high quality research? An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications , 2004 .

[20]  Erkko Autio.  New Technology-Based Firms in Innovation Networks , 1997 .

[21]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[22]  Michael Brocklehurst,et al.  Routes to technological learning and development , 1999 .

[23]  B. Clark.  Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation , 1998 .

[24]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[25]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R & D: the dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation , 1996 .

[26]  Frank Wilkinson,et al.  High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe , 2000 .

[27]  M. H. Marx,et al.  Theories in contemporary psychology , 1963 .

[28]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities? , 2005 .

[29]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  From Publishing to Patenting: do Productive Scientists Turn into Academic Inventors? , 2005 .

[30]  J. Oxley.  Appropriability Hazards and Governance in Strategic Alliances: A Transaction Cost Approach , 1997 .

[31]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[32]  S. Kostof.  America by Design , 1987 .

[33]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[34]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer , 2005 .

[35]  L. Anselin,et al.  Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge , 2002 .

[36]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria , 2003 .

[37]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of firmspecific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry , 1997 .

[38]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[39]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[41]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  The Knowledge Filter and Economic Growth: The Role of Scientist Entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[42]  Sukanya Kemp,et al.  Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing , 2002 .

[43]  James D. Adams,et al.  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[44]  Erkko Autio,et al.  NEW, TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS IN INNOVATION NETWORKS SYMPLECTIC AND GENERATIVE IMPACTS , 1997 .

[45]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Special Issue on Science Policy Dimensions of the Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1997 .

[46]  B. Lundvall.  National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[47]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[48]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Triple Helix of innovation: introduction , 1998 .

[49]  Janet Bercovitz,et al.  Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behavior: An Exploratory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities , 2001 .

[50]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Academic Knowledge Transfers and the Concentration of Economic Activity , 2000 .

[51]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[52]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States , 2004 .

[53]  Jorge Niosi,et al.  The Competencies of Regions – Canada's Clusters in Biotechnology , 2001 .

[54]  Scott Shane,et al.  Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States , 2004 .

[55]  Richard T. Harrison,et al.  Maximising the Potential of University Spin-Outs: The Development of Second-Order Commercialisation Activities , 2005 .

[56]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[57]  K. Debackere,et al.  Policies to Stimulate Regional Innovation Capabilities Via University-Industry Collaboration: An Analysis and an Assessment , 2003 .

[58]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration , 1986 .

[59]  B. Looy,et al.  Toward An Integrative Perspective on Alliance Governance: Connecting Contract Design, Trust Dynamics, and Contract Application , 2008 .

[60]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? , 2006 .

[61]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[62]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[63]  Joshua B. Powers.  R&D Funding Sources and University Technology Transfer: What Is Stimulating Universities to Be More Entrepreneurial? , 2004 .

[64]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[65]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[66]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Patent and Publication Activities of German Professors: An Empirical Assessment of Their Co-Activity , 2007 .

[67]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences , 1999 .

[68]  A. Varga.  University Research and Regional Innovation , 2012 .

[69]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[70]  Herbert I. Fusfeld.  Industrial Research—Where It's Been, Where It's Going , 1995 .

[71]  Richard Florida,et al.  Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States , 1999 .

[72]  B. Crawshaw.  Contract research, the university, and the academic , 1985 .

[73]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Are patenting scientists the better scholars?: An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology , 2006 .

[74]  A. Geuna,et al.  The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[75]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Capitalizing knowledge: new intersections of industry and academia , 1998 .

[76]  Mike Wright,et al.  Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence , 2005 .

[77]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Managing academic R&D as a business at K.U. Leuven: context, structure and process , 2000 .

[78]  Kira Fabrizio,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment , 2008 .

[79]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[80]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Incentives and Invention in Universities , 2003 .

[81]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[82]  Teresa Isabelle Daza Campbell,et al.  Faculty and Administrators' Attitudes toward Potential Conflicts of Interest, Commitment, and Equity in University-Industry Relationships , 1999 .

[83]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[84]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Combining the Production and the Valorization of Academic Research: A Qualitative Investigation of Enacted Mechanisms , 2006 .

[85]  Joshua B. Powers,et al.  University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms that Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[86]  R. Nelson.  The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[87]  Scott Shane,et al.  The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[88]  M. Wright,et al.  Spinning Out New Ventures: A Typology of Incubation Strategies from European Research Institutions , 2005 .

[89]  Dipti Pandya,et al.  How scientists commercialise new knowledge via entrepreneurship , 2008 .

[90]  Manuel Crespo,et al.  Intensification of university–industry relationships and its impact on academic research , 2007 .

[91]  Dominique Guellec,et al.  From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter? , 2004 .

[92]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  ACADEMIC INCENTIVES, RESEARCH ORGANIZATION AND PATENTING AT A LARGE FRENCH UNIVERSITY , 2007 .

[93]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[94]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  The economics of technical change , 1994 .

[95]  Angelo Riccaboni,et al.  European universities in transition : issues, models and cases , 2008 .

[96]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities , 1998 .

[97]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.