Do State Growth Management Regulations Reduce Sprawl?

Thirteen states in the United States have adopted state growth management legislation that aims to preserve environmentally sensitive areas, improve the quality of urban areas, and reduce urban sprawl. Although there is a considerable amount of literature describing such policies, there is very little that examines the effectiveness of such policies. The author researched the efficacy of state growth management laws in controlling urban sprawl by examining the change in urban densities in 49 states over a 15-year period. He found that growth-managed states generally experienced a lesser density decline than states without growth management. However, regression analysis revealed that state growth management programs did not have a statistically significant effect in checking sprawl. The author concludes with several suggestions for modifying state regulations to curb sprawl more effectively.

[1]  Robert E. Coughlin,et al.  Formulating and Evaluating Agricultural Zoning Programs , 1991 .

[2]  R. Fisher.  State and Local Public Finance , 1988 .

[3]  Douglas R. Porter,et al.  Managing Growth in America's Communities , 1997 .

[4]  R. Burchell.  ECONOMIC AND FISCAL COSTS (AND BENEFITS) OF SPRAWL , 1997 .

[5]  F. Bosselman,et al.  The quiet revolution in land use control , 1971 .

[6]  A. Downs.  Some Realities about Sprawl and Urban Decline , 1999 .

[7]  Eric D. Kelly.  Managing Community Growth: Policies, Techniques, and Impacts , 1994 .

[8]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  Growth management principles and practices , 1995 .

[9]  D. Gale.  Eight State-Sponsored Growth Management Programs: A Comparative Analysis , 1992 .

[10]  Matthew E. Kahn.  Does sprawl reduce the black/white housing consumption gap? , 2001 .

[11]  J. Degrove.  BALANCED GROWTH: A PLANNING GUIDE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT , 1994 .

[12]  Russ Lopez,et al.  Sprawl In The 1990s , 2003, Urban affairs review.

[13]  Scott A. Bollens,et al.  State Growth Management: Intergovernmental Frameworks and Policy Objectives , 1992 .

[14]  Thomas G. Pelham.  Adequate Public Facilities Requirements: Reflections on Florida's Concurrency System for Managing Growth , 1992 .

[15]  P. Salkin.  Smart Growth at Century’s End: The State of the States , 1999 .

[16]  R. Healy,et al.  Land use and the States , 1976 .

[17]  G. Galster,et al.  Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept , 2001 .

[18]  Gregory D. Squires,et al.  Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences, & Policy Responses , 2002 .

[19]  Rolf Joseph Pendall,et al.  Do Land-Use Controls Cause Sprawl? , 1999 .

[20]  E. Mills,et al.  Urban sprawl causes, consequences and policy responses: Gregory D. Squires, editor. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press, 2002 , 2003 .

[21]  Jerry Weitz,et al.  From Quiet Revolution to Smart Growth: State Growth Management Programs, 1960 to 1999 , 1999 .

[22]  John M. Levy,et al.  Contemporary Urban Planning , 1988 .

[23]  A. Nelson.  Comparing states with and without growth management Analysis based on indicators with policy implications , 1999 .

[24]  Harry W. Richardson,et al.  Critiquing Sprawl''s Critics , 2000 .