Multi-Level Multi-Modality Fusion Radiomics: Application to PET and CT Imaging for Prognostication of Head and Neck Cancer

To characterize intra-tumor heterogeneity comprehensively, we propose a multi-level fusion strategy to combine PET and CT information at the image-, matrix-and feature-levels towards improved prognosis. Specifically, we developed fusion radiomics in the context of 3 prognostic outcomes in a multi-center setting (4 centers) involving 296 head & neck cancer patients. Eight clinical parameters were first utilized to build a (1) clinical model. We also built models by extracting 127 radiomics features from (2) PET images alone; (3–8) PET and CT images fused via wavelet-based fusion (WF) using CT-weights of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8, gradient transfer fusion (GTF), and guided filtering-based fusion (GFF); (9) fused matrices (sumMat); (10–11) fused features constructed via feature averaging (avgFea) and feature concatenation (conFea); and finally, (12) CT images alone; above models were also expanded to include both clinical and radiomics features. Seven variations of training and testing partitions were investigated. Highest performance in 5, 6 and 5 partitions was achieved by image-level fusion strategies for RFS, MFS and OS prediction, respectively. Among all partitions, WF0.6 and WF0.8 showed significantly higher performance than CT model for RFS (C-index: 0.60 ± 0.04 vs. 0.56 ± 0.03, p-value: 0.015) and MFS (C-index: 0.71 ± 0.13 vs. 0.62 ± 0.08, p-value: 0.020) predictions, respectively. In partition CER 23 vs. 14, WF0.6 significantly outperformed Clinical model for RFS prediction (C-index: 0.67 vs. 0.53, p-value: 0.003); both avgFea and WF0.6 showed C-index of 0.64 and significantly higher than that of PET only (C-index: 0.51, p-value: 0.018 and 0.031, respectively) for OS prediction. Fusion radiomics modeling showed varying improvements compared to single modality models for different outcome predictions in different partitions, highlighting the importance of generalizing radiomics models. Image-level fusion holds potential to capture more useful characteristics.

[1]  A. Hegde,et al.  A Review of Quality Metrics for Fused Image , 2015 .

[2]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Radiomics strategies for risk assessment of tumour failure in head-and-neck cancer , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Computer-Aided Staging of Lymphoma Patients With FDG PET/CT Imaging Based on Textural Information , 2012, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[4]  M. Truong,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron-Emission Tomography Imaging of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  Kaori Togashi,et al.  Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters including visual evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Vishwa S. Parekh,et al.  Multiparametric radiomics methods for breast cancer tissue characterization using radiological imaging , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  Robustness of Radiomic Features in [11C]Choline and [18F]FDG PET/CT Imaging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Impact of Segmentation and Discretization , 2016, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[8]  K. Ang,et al.  Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. Hatt,et al.  18F-FDG PET Uptake Characterization Through Texture Analysis: Investigating the Complementary Nature of Heterogeneity and Functional Tumor Volume in a Multi–Cancer Site Patient Cohort , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Clifton D. Fuller,et al.  Exploring Applications of Radiomics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review , 2018, Front. Oncol..

[11]  H. Quon,et al.  FDG-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. , 2012, Imaging in medicine.

[12]  Clifton D Fuller,et al.  Radiomics in head and neck cancer: from exploration to application. , 2016, Translational cancer research.

[13]  I. El Naqa,et al.  A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Yoganand Balagurunathan,et al.  Radiomic biomarkers from PET/CT multi-modality fusion images for the prediction of immunotherapy response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Mithat Gonen,et al.  Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion. , 2004, Radiology.

[16]  Z. Rumboldt,et al.  Whole-Tumor Perfusion CT Parameters and Glucose Metabolism Measurements in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Pilot Study Using Combined Positron-Emission Tomography/CT Imaging , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Machine Learning Methods for Optimal Radiomics-Based Differentiation Between Recurrence and Inflammation: Application to Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Post-therapy PET/CT Images , 2019, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[18]  Shutao Li,et al.  Image Fusion With Guided Filtering , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  C. Furlanello,et al.  Integrating deep and radiomics features in cancer bioimaging , 2019, bioRxiv.

[20]  Abdel Kareem Azab,et al.  The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy , 2015, Hypoxia.

[21]  Chunyu Liu,et al.  Removing Batch Effects in Analysis of Expression Microarray Data: An Evaluation of Six Batch Adjustment Methods , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  Radiomics Analysis of PET and CT Components of PET/CT Imaging Integrated with Clinical Parameters: Application to Prognosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , 2019, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[23]  C. Snyderman,et al.  Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? , 2005, Radiology.

[24]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Computed Tomography Radiomics Predicts HPV Status and Local Tumor Control After Definitive Radiochemotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  P. Marsden,et al.  False Discovery Rates in PET and CT Studies with Texture Features: A Systematic Review , 2015, PloS one.

[26]  Jie Tian,et al.  The Applications of Radiomics in Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Oncology: Opportunities and Challenges , 2019, Theranostics.

[27]  J. Bradley,et al.  Combined PET/CT image characteristics for radiotherapy tumor response in lung cancer. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  A. Forastiere,et al.  Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Update on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. , 2016, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[29]  S. Ashrafinia QUANTITATIVE NUCLEAR MEDICINE IMAGING USING ADVANCED IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION AND RADIOMICS , 2019 .

[30]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[31]  R. Steenbakkers,et al.  The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. , 2020, Radiology.

[32]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Prognostic modeling for patients with colorectal liver metastases incorporating FDG PET radiomic features. , 2019, European journal of radiology.

[33]  Joseph O. Deasy,et al.  Quantification of Local Metabolic Tumor Volume Changes by Registering Blended PET-CT Images for Prediction of Pathologic Tumor Response , 2018, DATRA/PIPPI@MICCAI.

[34]  Hucheng Zhou,et al.  Dual-Model Radiomic Biomarkers Predict Development of Mild Cognitive Impairment Progression to Alzheimer’s Disease , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[35]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  Robustness versus disease differentiation when varying parameter settings in radiomics features: application to nasopharyngeal PET/CT , 2018, European Radiology.

[36]  J. Seuntjens,et al.  Deep learning in head & neck cancer outcome prediction , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[37]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Comparison of PET and CT radiomics for prediction of local tumor control in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2017, Acta oncologica.

[38]  Michael E Griswold,et al.  Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: CT texture and histogram analysis allow independent prediction of overall survival in patients treated with induction chemotherapy. , 2013, Radiology.

[39]  Ender Konukoglu,et al.  Post-radiochemotherapy PET radiomics in head and neck cancer - The influence of radiomics implementation on the reproducibility of local control tumor models. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.