Measuring income related inequality in health: standardisation and the partial concentration index.

The partial concentration index (PCI) is commonly used as a measure of income related inequality in health after removing the effects of standardising variables such as age and gender which affect health, are correlated with income, but not amenable to policy. Both direct and indirect standardisation have been used to remove the effects of standardising variables. The paper shows that with individual level data direct standardisation is possible using the coefficients from a linear regression of health on income and the standardising variables and yields a consistent estimate of the PCI. Indirect standardisation estimates the effects of the standardising variables on health from a health regression which excludes income. The coefficients on the standardising variables include some of the effects of income on health if income is correlated with the standardising variables. Using these coefficients to remove the effects of the standardising variables also removes some of the effect of income on health and leads to an inconsistent estimate of the PCI. Indirect standardisation underestimates the PCI irrespective of the signs of the correlations of standardising variables and income with each other and with health. An adaptation of the PCI when the marginal effect of income on health depends on the standardising variables is also proposed.

[1]  Philip M Clarke,et al.  On the measurement of relative and absolute income-related health inequality. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[2]  M. Sutton Vertical and horizontal aspects of socio-economic inequity in general practitioner contacts in Scotland. , 2002, Health economics.

[3]  P. Lambert The Distribution and Redistribution of Income , 1989 .

[4]  A. Wagstaff,et al.  Measuring and Testing for Inequity in the Delivery of Health Care , 2000 .

[5]  H. Gravelle,et al.  Income related inequalities in self assessed health in Britain: 1979–1995 , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[6]  A. Wagstaff,et al.  Measuring inequalities in health in the presence of multiple-category morbidity indicators. , 1994, Health economics.

[7]  L Gross,et al.  Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US. , 2000, Journal of health economics.

[8]  N. Kakwani,et al.  Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Measurement, computation, and statistical inference , 1997 .

[9]  S. J. Kilpatrick Mortality Comparisons in Socio-Economic Groups , 1963 .

[10]  A. Wagstaff,et al.  On Decomposing the Causes of Health Sector Inequalities with an Application to Malnutrition Inequalities in Vietnam , 2001 .

[11]  P. Sorlie,et al.  The shape of the relationship between income and mortality in the United States. Evidence from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. , 1996, Annals of epidemiology.

[12]  C. Propper,et al.  Need, Equity and the NHS: The Distribution of Health Care Expenditure 1974–87 , 1992 .

[13]  J. Nicholl,et al.  Why do we continue to use standardized mortality ratios for small area comparisons? , 2001, Journal of public health medicine.

[14]  G. Yule On Some Points Relating to Vital Statistics, More Especially Statistics of Occupational Mortality , 1934 .

[15]  S. Ettner New evidence on the relationship between income and health. , 1996, Journal of health economics.

[16]  J. Brazier,et al.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. , 2002, Journal of health economics.

[17]  A. Wagstaff,et al.  Chapter 34 Equity in health care finance and delivery , 2000 .

[18]  C. Propper,et al.  Income-related inequalities in health: some international comparisons. , 1997, Journal of health economics.