Factors associated with therapeutic response in acromegaly diagnosed in the elderly in Spain

Context Some reports suggest that acromegaly in elderly patients has a more benign clinical behavior and could have a better response to first-generation long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL). However, there is no specific therapeutic protocol for this special subgroup of patients. Objective This study aimed at identifying predictors of response to SRL in elderly patients. Design Multicentric retrospective nationwide study of patients diagnosed with acromegaly at or over the age of 65 years. Results One-hundred and eighteen patients (34 men, 84 women, mean age at diagnosis 71.7 ± 5.4 years old) were included. Basal insulin-like growth factor type 1 (IGF-1) above the upper limit of normal (ULN) and growth hormone (GH) levels (mean ± SD) were 2.7 ± 1.4 and 11.0 ± 11.9 ng/ml, respectively. The mean maximal tumor diameter was 12.3 ± 6.4 mm, and up to 68.6% were macroadenoma. Seventy-two out of 118 patients (61.0%) underwent surgery as primary treatment. One-third of patients required first-line medical treatment due to a rejection of surgical treatment or non-suitability because of high surgical risk. After first-line surgery, 45/72 (63.9%) were in disease remission, and 16/34 (46.7%) of those treated with SRL had controlled disease. Patients with basal GH at diagnosis ≤6 ng/ml had lower IGF-1 levels and had smaller tumors, and more patients in this group reached control with SRL (72.7% vs. 33.3%; p < 0.04) [OR: 21.3, IC: 95% (2.4–91.1)], while male patients had a worse response [OR: 0.09, IC 95% (0.01–0.75)]. The predictive model curve obtained for SRL response showed an AUC of 0.82 CI (0.71–0.94). Conclusions The most frequent phenotype in newly diagnosed acromegaly in the elderly includes small adenomas and moderately high IGF-1 levels. GH at diagnosis ≤6 ng/ml and female gender, but not age per se, were associated with a greater chance of response to SRL.

[1]  S. Volpato,et al.  Multidimensional geriatric evaluation in acromegaly: a comparative cross-sectional study , 2021, BMC Geriatrics.

[2]  G. Zoppoli,et al.  Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Biochemical Response to First-Line Treatment With Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly: A Real-Life Perspective , 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology.

[3]  A. V. van Beek,et al.  Predictors for Remission after Transsphenoidal Surgery in Acromegaly: A Dutch Multicenter Study , 2020, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[4]  N. Oyesiku,et al.  Incidentally detected acromegaly: single-center study of surgically treated patients over 22 years , 2020, Journal of Investigative Medicine.

[5]  P. Chanson,et al.  Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus , 2020, Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders.

[6]  G. Occhi,et al.  Clinical presentation and management of acromegaly in elderly patients , 2020, Hormones.

[7]  P. Chanson,et al.  Multivariable prediction model for biochemical response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly. , 2020, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[8]  L. Hernández-Ramírez Potential markers of disease behavior in acromegaly and gigantism , 2020, Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism.

[9]  M. Fleseriu,et al.  Acromegaly in the elderly patients , 2020, Endocrine.

[10]  F. Casanueva,et al.  A Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acromegaly Comorbidities: An Update. , 2020, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[11]  P. Caron,et al.  Predictive factors for responses to primary medical treatment with lanreotide autogel 120 mg in acromegaly: post hoc analyses from the PRIMARYS study , 2019, Pituitary.

[12]  M. Puig-Domingo,et al.  Precision medicine in the treatment of acromegaly. , 2019, Minerva endocrinologica.

[13]  P. Chanson,et al.  National acromegaly registries. , 2019, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.

[14]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  Transsphenoidal Surgery for Elderly Patients with Acromegaly and Its Outcomes: Comparison with Younger Patients. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[15]  A. Buchanan A Consensus , 2018, Parenting, Schooling and Children's Behaviour.

[16]  B. Gonzalez,et al.  Prevalence, Clinical and Biochemical Spectrum, and Treatment Outcome of Acromegaly With Normal Basal GH at Diagnosis , 2018, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[17]  P. Chanson,et al.  A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes , 2018, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[18]  L. Kasuki,et al.  MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Personalized medicine in the treatment of acromegaly. , 2018, European journal of endocrinology.

[19]  P. Chanson,et al.  Acromegaly at diagnosis in 3173 patients from the Liège Acromegaly Survey (LAS) Database , 2017, Endocrine-related cancer.

[20]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Acromegaly incidence, prevalence, complications and long-term prognosis: a nationwide cohort study. , 2016, European journal of endocrinology.

[21]  S. Sullivan,et al.  “Micromegaly”: an update on the prevalence of acromegaly with apparently normal GH secretion in the modern era , 2016, Pituitary.

[22]  D. Cuevas-Ramos,et al.  The Mexican Acromegaly Registry: Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics at Diagnosis and Therapeutic Outcomes. , 2016, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[23]  M. Neary,et al.  Incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in a large US health plan database , 2016, Pituitary.

[24]  N. Oyesiku,et al.  SIGNIFICANT ELEVATION OF GROWTH HORMONE LEVEL IMPACTS SURGICAL OUTCOMES IN ACROMEGALY. , 2015, Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

[25]  A. Mamelak,et al.  A structural and functional acromegaly classification. , 2015, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[26]  E. Laws,et al.  Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. , 2014, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[27]  S. Gaztambide,et al.  Changes in acromegaly treatment over four decades in Spain: analysis of the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (REA) , 2013, Pituitary.

[28]  Jeffrey N Bruce,et al.  Features at diagnosis of 324 patients with acromegaly did not change from 1981 to 2006: acromegaly remains under‐recognized and under‐diagnosed , 2010, Clinical endocrinology.

[29]  F. Greenway,et al.  An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline Endocrine and Nutritional Management of the Post-Bariatric Surgery Patient: , 2010 .

[30]  T. Hanafusa,et al.  The influence of age on the GH-IGF1 axis in patients with acromegaly. , 2008, European journal of endocrinology.

[31]  K. Sugiyama,et al.  Treatment of elderly acromegalics. , 2008, Endocrine journal.

[32]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[33]  G. Vitale,et al.  A retrospective analysis on biochemical parameters, cardiovascular risk and cardiomyopathy in elderly acromegalic patients , 2007, Journal of endocrinological investigation.

[34]  D. Rabinowitz,et al.  Long-acting somatostatin analog therapy of acromegaly: a meta-analysis. , 2005, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[35]  S. Gaztambide,et al.  Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcome, morbidity and mortality in acromegaly based on the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (Registro Espanol de Acromegalia, REA). , 2004, European journal of endocrinology.

[36]  A. Barkan,et al.  Acromegaly with apparently normal GH secretion: implications for diagnosis and follow-up. , 2002, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[37]  V. Esposito,et al.  Surgical Treatment and Clinical Outcome of GH-Secreting Adenomas in Elderly Patients , 2001, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[38]  D. Lüdecke,et al.  Pituitary surgery in elderly patients with acromegaly. , 1995, Neurosurgery.

[39]  S. Lamberts,et al.  The sensitivity of growth hormone secretion to medical treatment in acromegalic patients: influence of age and sex , 1992, Clinical endocrinology.

[40]  K. Johnson An Update. , 1984, Journal of food protection.