Mathematical models of specificity in cell signaling.

Cellular signaling pathways transduce extracellular signals into appropriate responses. These pathways are typically interconnected to form networks, often with different pathways sharing similar or identical components. A consequence of this connectedness is the potential for cross talk, some of which may be undesirable. Indeed, experimental evidence indicates that cells have evolved insulating mechanisms to partially suppress "leaking" between pathways. Here we characterize mathematical models of simple signaling networks and obtain exact analytical expressions for two measures of cross talk called specificity and fidelity. The performance of several insulating mechanisms--combinatorial signaling, compartmentalization, the inhibition of one pathway by another, and the selective activation of scaffold proteins--is evaluated with respect to the trade-off between the specificity they provide and the constraints they place on the network. The effects of noise are also examined. The insights gained from this analysis are applied to understanding specificity in the yeast mating and invasive growth MAP kinase signaling network.

[1]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  How signaling proteins integrate multiple inputs: a comparison of N-WASP and Cdk2. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  C. Pesce,et al.  Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.

[3]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  Mathematical models of protein kinase signal transduction. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[4]  D. Gillespie.  The chemical Langevin equation , 2000 .

[5]  Stephen S. Gisselbrecht,et al.  Ras Pathway Specificity Is Determined by the Integration of Multiple Signal-Activated and Tissue-Restricted Transcription Factors , 2000, Cell.

[6]  G. Fink,et al.  Elements of a single MAP kinase cascade in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mediate two developmental programs in the same cell type: mating and invasive growth. , 1994, Genes & development.

[7]  A. Aplin,et al.  Anchorage-dependent ERK signaling--mechanisms and consequences. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[8]  Rachel E. Lamson,et al.  Dual Role for Membrane Localization in Yeast MAP Kinase Cascade Activation and Its Contribution to Signaling Fidelity , 2006, Current Biology.

[9]  Bernd Binder,et al.  Interrelations between dynamical properties and structural characteristics of signal transduction networks. , 2004, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.

[10]  Madhukar S. Dasika,et al.  A computational framework for the topological analysis and targeted disruption of signal transduction networks. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[11]  R. Derynck,et al.  Specificity and versatility in tgf-beta signaling through Smads. , 2005, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[12]  Henrik G. Dohlman,et al.  Pheromone Signaling Mechanisms in Yeast: A Prototypical Sex Machine , 2004, Science.

[13]  J. Dumont,et al.  Cross signaling, cell specificity, and physiology. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[14]  D. A. Baxter,et al.  Modeling transcriptional control in gene networks—methods, recent results, and future directions , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[15]  T. Elston,et al.  Bistability, stochasticity, and oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Hiten D. Madhani,et al.  Control of MAPK signaling specificity by a conserved residue in the MEK-binding domain of the yeast scaffold protein Ste5 , 2006, Current Genetics.

[17]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Complexity in biological signaling systems. , 1999, Science.

[18]  C. Marshall,et al.  Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: Transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation , 1995, Cell.

[19]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  The JAK-STAT signaling network in the human B-cell: an extreme signaling pathway analysis. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Axel Kowald,et al.  A modelling approach to quantify dynamic crosstalk between the pheromone and the starvation pathway in baker's yeast , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[21]  Lan Huang,et al.  Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast , 2004, Cell.

[22]  J. Ferrell.  Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[23]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[24]  Logical analysis of timing-dependent receptor signalling specificity: application to the insulin receptor metabolic and mitogenic signalling pathways. , 1997, The Biochemical journal.

[25]  Henry R. Bourne,et al.  Molecular machines integrate coincident synaptic signals , 1993, Cell.

[26]  B. Kholodenko.  Four-dimensional organization of protein kinase signaling cascades: the roles of diffusion, endocytosis and molecular motors , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  Anirvan M. Sengupta,et al.  G-protein-coupled enzyme cascades have intrinsic properties that improve signal localization and fidelity. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[28]  B N Kholodenko,et al.  Why do protein kinase cascades have more than one level? , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[29]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Optimal Length and Signal Amplification in Weakly Activated Signal Transduction Cascades , 2003, math/0311357.

[30]  Xiufen Zou,et al.  A theoretical framework for specificity in cell signaling , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[31]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Topological analysis of mass-balanced signaling networks: a framework to obtain network properties including crosstalk. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  Daniel Metzger,et al.  Activation of the Estrogen Receptor Through Phosphorylation by Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase , 1995, Science.

[33]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Networks and crosstalk: integrin signalling spreads , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[34]  U. Suter,et al.  Neural crest stem cell maintenance by combinatorial Wnt and BMP signaling , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Specificity in Signal Transduction From Phosphotyrosine-SH2 Domain Interactions to Complex Cellular Systems , 2004, Cell.

[36]  John R. Yates,et al.  Pheromone-Dependent Destruction of the Tec1 Transcription Factor Is Required for MAP Kinase Signaling Specificity in Yeast , 2004, Cell.

[37]  Elaine A. Elion,et al.  Signaling Specificity in Yeast , 2005, Science.

[38]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  Henrik G. Dohlman,et al.  Pheromone-regulated Sumoylation of Transcription Factors That Mediate the Invasive to Mating Developmental Switch in Yeast* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  H. Schaeffer,et al.  Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases: Specific Messages from Ubiquitous Messengers , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[41]  W. Sabbagh,et al.  Specificity of MAP kinase signaling in yeast differentiation involves transient versus sustained MAPK activation. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[42]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Role of the yeast Snf1 protein kinase in invasive growth. , 2001, Biochemical Society transactions.

[44]  R. Iyengar,et al.  Signaling Networks The Origins of Cellular Multitasking , 2000, Cell.

[45]  J. Thorner,et al.  Jekyll and Hyde in the Microbial World , 2004, Science.

[46]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  A signaling mucin at the head of the Cdc42- and MAPK-dependent filamentous growth pathway in yeast. , 2004, Genes & development.

[47]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Interactions between mitogenic stimuli, or, a thousand and one connections. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.

[48]  E. Elion,et al.  The Ste5p scaffold. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[49]  Stuart K. Kim,et al.  Signaling specificity: the RTK/RAS/MAP kinase pathway in metazoans. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[50]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Reconstruction of cellular signalling networks and analysis of their properties , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[51]  Kyong-Tai Kim,et al.  G protein-coupled receptor signalling and cross-talk: achieving rapidity and specificity. , 2002, Cellular signalling.

[52]  Philippe Soriano,et al.  In vivo convergence of BMP and MAPK signaling pathways: impact of differential Smad1 phosphorylation on development and homeostasis. , 2004, Genes & development.

[53]  M. Simon,et al.  Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Specific Outcomes from General Signals , 2000, Cell.

[54]  B N Kholodenko,et al.  Spatial gradients of cellular phospho‐proteins , 1999, FEBS letters.

[55]  Marco Siderius,et al.  Selectivity in overlapping MAP kinase cascades. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[56]  A. Arkin,et al.  It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[57]  L. Bardwell.  A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway , 2004, Peptides.

[58]  M. Tyers,et al.  MAPK specificity in the yeast pheromone response independent of transcriptional activation , 2001, Current Biology.

[59]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases with Distinct Requirements for Ste5 Scaffolding Influence Signaling Specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[60]  Charis Eng,et al.  Catalytic specificity of protein-tyrosine kinases is critical for selective signalling , 1995, Nature.

[61]  Chi-Ying F. Huang,et al.  Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  H. Madhani,et al.  Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[63]  F. McCormick,et al.  Signaling Specificity by Ras Family GTPases Is Determined by the Full Spectrum of Effectors They Regulate , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[64]  G. Fink,et al.  Elements of the yeast pheromone response pathway required for filamentous growth of diploids. , 1993, Science.

[65]  R. Derynck,et al.  SPECIFICITY AND VERSATILITY IN TGF-β SIGNALING THROUGH SMADS , 2005 .

[66]  Stefan Brückner,et al.  Differential regulation of Tec1 by Fus3 and Kss1 confers signaling specificity in yeast development , 2004, Current Genetics.

[67]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Noise Propagation in Gene Networks , 2005, Science.