Curriculum Planning for All Learners: Applying Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to a High School Reading Comprehension Program

The universal design for learning (UDL) principles provide a blueprint for designing a curriculum that addresses the diverse needs of all learners. The author provides an overview of UDL, connections to curriculum planning, and practical techniques that guide general and special education teachers in planning and implementing curriculum, using the planning for all learners (PAL) procedures. PAL is a 4-step process for designing and implementing a curriculum (goals, methods, materials, and assessments) that is accessible and effective for all learners. In this article, the author focuses on high school social studies content with a goal of supporting all students' understanding of the content by bringing together principles of UDL, the PAL process, and research-based reading comprehension strategies.

[1]  James J. O'Donnell,et al.  Avatars of the Word: From Papyrus to Cyberspace , 1998 .

[2]  Anne Meyer,et al.  Universal Design for Individual Differences. , 2000 .

[3]  Dana L. Grisham,et al.  Scaffolding English Language Learners and Struggling Readers in a Universal Literacy Environment with Embedded Strategy Instruction and Vocabulary Support , 2007 .

[4]  Promoting Cooperative Learning Experiences for Students with Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities. , 1993 .

[5]  T. Guskey.  Does It Make a Difference? Evaluating Professional Development , 2002 .

[6]  R T Johnson,et al.  Mainstreaming and Cooperative Learning Strategies , 1986, Exceptional children.

[7]  David H. Rose,et al.  A Practical Reader in Universal Design for Learning. , 2006 .

[8]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction , 2002 .

[9]  William H. Rupley,et al.  A Structural Equation Model for Reading Comprehension Based on Background, Phonemic, and Strategy Knowledge , 1997 .

[10]  Anne Meyer,et al.  Learning to Read in the Computer Age , 1999 .

[11]  Catherine Snow,et al.  Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension , 2002 .

[12]  Michael F. Graves.  Effects of Previewing Difficult Short Stories on Low Ability Junior High School Students' Comprehension, Recall, and Attitudes. , 1983 .

[13]  Jay R. Campbell,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Reading, 2002. , 2003 .

[14]  David H. Rose,et al.  The Future Is in the Margins: The Role of Technology and Disability in Educational Reform. , 2000 .

[15]  Samuel Forest.  Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development , 1955 .

[16]  Kate Cain,et al.  Scientific Studies of Reading , 1997 .

[17]  Sean Zdenek.  Avatars of the word: from papyrus to cyberspace , 2000, CSOC.

[18]  P. David Pearson,et al.  The CIERA School Change Project: Supporting Schools as They Implement Home-Grown Reading Reform. CIERA Report. , 2002 .

[19]  Anne Meyer,et al.  The Universally Designed Classroom: Accessible Curriculum and Digital Technologies. , 2005 .

[20]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching , 1998 .

[21]  Carol Ann Tomlinson,et al.  The Differentiated Classroom: Responding the Needs of All Learners , 1999 .

[22]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Interactive Teaching to Promote Independent Learning from Text. , 1986 .