A Framework for Measuring the Progress in Exoskeleton Skills in People with Complete Spinal Cord Injury

For safe application of exoskeletons in people with spinal cord injury at home or in the community, it is required to have completed an exoskeleton training in which users learn to perform basic and advanced skills. So far, a framework to test exoskeleton skills is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop and test the hierarchy and reliability of a framework for measuring the progress in the ability to perform basic and advanced skills. Twelve participants with paraplegia were given twenty-four training sessions in 8 weeks with the Rewalk-exoskeleton. During the 2nd, 4th, and 6th training week the Intermediate-skills-test was performed consisting of 27 skills, measured in an hierarchical order of difficulty, until two skills were not achieved. When participants could walk independently, the Final-skills-test, consisting of 20 skills, was performed in the last training session. Each skill was performed at least two times with a maximum of three attempts. As a reliability measure the consistency was used, which was the number of skills performed the same in the first two attempts relative to the total number. Ten participants completed the training program. Their number of achieved intermediate skills was significantly different between the measurements XF2(2) = 12.36, p = 0.001. Post-hoc analysis revealed a significant increase in the median achieved intermediate skills from 4 [1–7] at the first to 10.5 [5–26] at the third Intermediate-skills-test. The rate of participants who achieved the intermediate skills decreased and the coefficient of reproducibility was 0.98. Eight participants met the criteria to perform the Final-skills-test. Their median number of successfully performed final skills was 16.5 [13–20] and 17 [14–19] skills in the first and second time. The overall consistency of >70% was achieved in the Intermediate-skills-test (73%) and the Final-skills-test (81%). Eight out of twelve participants experienced skin damage during the training, in four participants this resulted in missed training sessions. The framework proposed in this study measured the progress in performing basic and advanced exoskeleton skills during a training program. The hierarchical ordered skills-test could discriminate across participants' skill-level and the overall consistency was considered acceptable.

[1]  Dennis R. Louie,et al.  Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  C. Walsh,et al.  Effect of timing of hip extension assistance during loaded walking with a soft exosuit , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™ exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: A pilot study , 2012, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[4]  M. Mirbagheri,et al.  Effects of robotic-locomotor training on stretch reflex function and muscular properties in individuals with spinal cord injury , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Stefano Federici,et al.  The effectiveness of powered, active lower limb exoskeletons in neurorehabilitation: A systematic review. , 2015, NeuroRehabilitation.

[6]  Clare Hartigan,et al.  Mobility Outcomes Following Five Training Sessions with a Powered Exoskeleton. , 2015, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[7]  L. Blanch,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a new orthosis, the `Walkabout', for restoration of functional standing and short distance mobility in spinal paralysed individuals , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[8]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[9]  J. V. van Middendorp,et al.  Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study , 2016, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Priscila G Mazzola,et al.  Upstream and Downstream of Recombinants Biomolecules to Health Care Industry , 2016, BioMed research international.

[12]  Marcel P Dijkers,et al.  Time and Effort Required by Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Learn to Use a Powered Exoskeleton for Assisted Walking. , 2015, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[13]  Sarah F Tyson,et al.  Development of the Brunel Balance Assessment: a new measure of balance disability post stroke. , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[14]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  A systematic review of wheelchair skills tests for manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury: towards a standardized outcome measure , 2010, Clinical rehabilitation.

[15]  Mikhail A. Lebedev,et al.  Mechatronic Wearable Exoskeletons for Bionic Bipedal Standing and Walking: A New Synthetic Approach , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[16]  T. Platz,et al.  Device-Training for Individuals with Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Cord Injury Using a Powered Exoskeleton for Technically Assisted Mobility: Achievements and User Satisfaction , 2016, BioMed research international.

[17]  J. Wyndaele,et al.  Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[18]  Riemer J. K. Vegter,et al.  Effects of variable practice on the motor learning outcomes in manual wheelchair propulsion , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[19]  L. Guttman A basis for scaling qualitative data. , 1944 .

[20]  S. Kolakowsky-Hayner,et al.  Safety and Feasibility of using the EksoTM Bionic Exoskeleton to Aid Ambulation after Spinal Cord Injury , 2013 .

[21]  Pierre Asselin,et al.  Assessment of In-Hospital Walking Velocity and Level of Assistance in a Powered Exoskeleton in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury. , 2015, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[22]  Marcel P Dijkers,et al.  Framework for Assessment of the Usability of Lower-Extremity Robotic Exoskeletal Orthoses , 2015, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[23]  H. Hermens,et al.  Perception of lower limb spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[24]  J S Walter,et al.  Follow-up assessment of standing mobility device users. , 1998, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[25]  N. Harel,et al.  Exoskeletal-Assisted Walking for Persons with Motor-Complete Paraplegia , 2013 .

[26]  J. Visser-Meily,et al.  Secondary health conditions and quality of life in persons living with spinal cord injury for at least ten years. , 2016, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[27]  K. Yorkston,et al.  Frequency and age effects of secondary health conditions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a scoping review , 2013, Spinal Cord.

[28]  P. London Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[29]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Feasibility of rehabilitation training with a newly developed wearable robot for patients with limited mobility. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  L. Miller,et al.  Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis , 2016, Medical devices.

[31]  M Fitzharris,et al.  The global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: update 2011, global incidence rate , 2013, Spinal Cord.

[32]  Helen Scott,et al.  Lower Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures: A Review of the Literature 1995 to 2005 , 2006 .

[33]  Trieu Phat Luu,et al.  Risk management and regulations for lower limb medical exoskeletons: a review , 2017, Medical devices.

[34]  D. Gombos,et al.  Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology , 2013 .