RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RIGIDITY OF EXTERNAL FIXATOR AND NUMBER OF PINS: COMPUTER ANALYSIS USING FINITE ELEMENTS

Objective: To analyze the rigidity of a platform-type external fixator assembly, according to different numbers of pins on each clamp. Methods: Computer simulation on a large-sized Cromus dynamic external fixator (Baumer SA) was performed using a finite element method, in accordance with the standard ASTM F1541. The models were generated with approximately 450,000 quadratic tetrahedral elements. Assemblies with two, three and four Schanz pins of 5.5 mm in diameter in each clamp were compared. Every model was subjected to a maximum force of 200 N, divided into 10 sub-steps. For the components, the behavior of the material was assumed to be linear, elastic, isotropic and homogeneous. For each model, the rigidity of the assembly and the Von Mises stress distribution were evaluated. Results: The rigidity of the system was 307.6 N/mm for two pins, 369.0 N/mm for three and 437.9 N/mm for four. Conclusion: The results showed that four Schanz pins in each clamp promoted rigidity that was 19% greater than in the configuration with three pins and 42% greater than with two pins. Higher tension occurred in configurations with fewer pins. In the models analyzed, the maximum tension occurred on the surface of the pin, close to the fixation area.

[1]  Guigen Zhang,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Unilateral External Skeletal Fixators Combined with IM-Pin and Without IM-Pin Using Finite-Element Method. , 2006, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[2]  F L Drijber,et al.  Evaluation of linear finite-element analysis models' assumptions for external fixation devices. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  R. Takata Analise do desgaste do polietileno do componente acetabular da protese total do quadril, utilizando o metodo de elementos finitos de simulacao computadorizada , 2001 .

[4]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Guidelines for external fixation frame rigidity and stresses , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  D E T Shepherd,et al.  Finite element modelling of the Ilizarov external fixation system , 2007, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  T. Gardner,et al.  Load transmission through a healing tibial fracture. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  A F T Mak,et al.  Fixation stiffness of Dynafix unilateral external fixator in neutral and non-neutral configurations. , 2005, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[8]  P Augat,et al.  Effect of dynamization on gap healing of diaphyseal fractures under external fixation. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  E. Chao,et al.  Parametric analyses of pin‐bone stresses in external fracture fixation devices , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  J Sánchez-Lacuesta,et al.  Biomechanical consequences of callus development in Hoffmann, Wagner, Orthofix and Ilizarov external fixators. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  E Y Chao,et al.  A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.