Growth affects dispersal success in social mole-rats, but not the duration of philopatry

In naked mole-rats (Heterocephalus glaber), some non-breeding males show faster growth and are more likely to disperse than others. These differences have been suggested to be the result of a specialized developmental strategy leading to shorter philopatry and independent breeding, as opposed to extended philopatry as non-reproductive helpers. However, it is unclear whether fast-growing males disperse sooner than slow-growing males. An alternative explanation is that variation in quality between individuals causes high-quality individuals to grow quickly and maximize dispersal success without reducing philopatry. Here we show that in Damaraland mole-rats (Fukomys damarensis), males that subsequently disperse successfully grow faster than other non-reproductive males. This pattern is predicted by both hypotheses and does not discriminate between them. However, contrary to the suggestion that faster growth represents a developmental specialization for early dispersal, fast-growing and slow-growing males remained equally long in their natal groups. Our study provides no evidence for adaptive divergence in male development leading either to early dispersal or extended philopatry. Instead of representing specialized dispersers, fast-growing males of this species may be high-quality individuals.

[1]  L. Brent Mammal societies Tim Clutton-Brock Mammal societies , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Variation in growth of Damaraland mole-rats is explained by competition rather than by functional specialization for different tasks , 2016, Biology Letters.

[3]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Differences in cooperative behavior among Damaraland mole rats are consequences of an age-related polyethism , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  N. Raihani,et al.  Developmental plasticity and social specialization in cooperative societies , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  J. Jarvis,et al.  Workforce Effects and the Evolution of Complex Sociality in Wild Damaraland Mole Rats , 2015, The American Naturalist.

[6]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Cooperative personalities and social niche specialization in female meerkats , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[7]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Strategic reduction of help before dispersal in a cooperative breeder , 2013, Biology Letters.

[8]  S. Braude African Mole‐rats: Ecology and Eusociality , 2000 .

[9]  R. Honeycutt,et al.  Are naked and common mole-rats eusocial and if so, why? , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  J. Jarvis,et al.  Comparative patterns of philopatry and dispersal in two common mole-rat populations: implications for the evolution of mole-rat sociality , 2000 .

[11]  M. O'Riain,et al.  A dispersive morph in the naked mole-rat , 1996, Nature.

[12]  M. O'Riain,et al.  Mammalian eusociality: a family affair. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  N. Bennett Behaviour and social organization in a colony of the Damaraland mole‐rat Cryptomys damarensis , 1990 .

[14]  Nigel C. Bennett,et al.  The Social Structure and Reproductive Biology of Colonies of the Mole-Rat, Cryptomys damarensis (Rodentia, Bathyergidae) , 1988 .

[15]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Meerkats: Cooperative breeding in the Kalahari , 2016 .

[16]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[17]  J. Korb,et al.  Social organisation and the status of workers in termites , 2010 .

[18]  Nigel C. Bennett,et al.  Cryptomys damarensis , 2004 .

[19]  S. Braude Dispersal and new colony formation in wild naked mole-rats: evidence against inbreeding as the system of mating , 2000 .

[20]  Yves Roisin,et al.  Diversity and evolution of caste patterns , 2000 .

[21]  S. Begall The application of the Gompertz model to describe body growth. , 1997, Growth, development, and aging : GDA.