FUTURES: Multilevel Simulations of Emerging Urban–Rural Landscape Structure Using a Stochastic Patch-Growing Algorithm

We present a multilevel modeling framework for simulating the emergence of landscape spatial structure in urbanizing regions using a combination of field-based and object-based representations of land change. The FUTure Urban-Regional Environment Simulation (FUTURES) produces regional projections of landscape patterns using coupled submodels that integrate nonstationary drivers of land change: per capita demand, site suitability, and the spatial structure of conversion events. Patches of land change events are simulated as discrete spatial objects using a stochastic region-growing algorithm that aggregates cell-level transitions based on empirical estimation of parameters that control the size, shape, and dispersion of patch growth. At each time step, newly constructed patches reciprocally influence further growth, which agglomerates over time to produce patterns of urban form and landscape fragmentation. Multilevel structure in each submodel allows drivers of land change to vary in space (e.g., by jurisdiction), rather than assuming spatial stationarity across a heterogeneous region. We applied FUTURES to simulate land development dynamics in the rapidly expanding metropolitan region of Charlotte, North Carolina, between 1996 and 2030, and evaluated spatial variation in model outcomes along an urban–rural continuum, including assessments of cell- and patch-based correctness and error. Simulation experiments reveal that changes in per capita land consumption and parameters controlling the distribution of development affect the emergent spatial structure of forests and farmlands with unique and sometimes counterintuitive outcomes.

[1]  F. Chapin,et al.  Urban Land Use Planning. , 1957 .

[2]  Ronald H. Perrott,et al.  Parallel programming , 1988, International computer science series.

[3]  R Sharpe,et al.  Urban land use planning , 1988 .

[4]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[5]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem Structure and Function along Urban‐Rural Gradients: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology , 1990 .

[6]  A. Mannion.  People and places , 1992, Nature.

[7]  David R. Foster,et al.  Land-Use History (1730-1990) and Vegetation Dynamics in Central New England, USA , 1992 .

[8]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .

[9]  K. Jones,et al.  People and places: the multilevel model as a general framework for the quantitative analysis of geographical data , 1996 .

[10]  P. Bolund,et al.  Ecosystem services in urban areas , 1999 .

[11]  R. Freckleton,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1999 .

[12]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept , 1999 .

[13]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems , 1999 .

[14]  B. Pijanowski,et al.  Modeling the relationships between land use and land cover on private lands in the Upper Midwest, USA , 2000 .

[15]  Mary L. Cadenasso,et al.  Forest Edges as Nutrient and Pollutant Concentrators: Potential Synergisms between Fragmentation, Forest Canopies, and the Atmosphere , 2001 .

[16]  R. Myster.  What is Ecosystem Structure , 2001 .

[17]  R. Gil Pontius,et al.  Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: application and validation for Costa Rica , 2001 .

[18]  R. Ewing,et al.  MEASURING SPRAWL AND ITS IMPACT , 2002 .

[19]  A. Burnicki,et al.  Stochastic Simulation of Land-Cover Change Using Geostatistics and Generalized Additive Models , 2002 .

[20]  Matthias Bürgi,et al.  Factors and Processes Shaping Land Cover and Land Cover Changes Along the Wisconsin River , 2002, Ecosystems.

[21]  MARYLAND'S "SMART GROWTH": USING INCENTIVES TO COMBAT SPRAWL. IN: URBAN SPRAWL: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES AND POLICY RESPONSES , 2002 .

[22]  Fulong Wu,et al.  Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Kimberly A. With.  The Landscape Ecology of Invasive Spread , 2002 .

[24]  A. Arnfield.  Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island , 2003 .

[25]  Kathleen P. Bell,et al.  Modeling and Managing Urban Growth at the Rural-Urban Fringe: A Parcel-Level Model of Residential Land Use Change , 2003, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[26]  Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson,et al.  Urban Sprawl and the Cost of Public Services , 2003 .

[27]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Constructing Cell-Based Habitat Patches Useful in Conservation Planning , 2003 .

[28]  E. Irwin,et al.  Land use externalities, open space preservation, and urban sprawl , 2004 .

[29]  G. D. Jenerette,et al.  © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Research Article Analysis and simulation of land-use change in the central Arizona – , 2022 .

[30]  Changshan Wu,et al.  Normalized spectral mixture analysis for monitoring urban composition using ETM+ imagery , 2004 .

[31]  Paul Schot,et al.  Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities , 2004 .

[32]  Jerry Anthony,et al.  Do State Growth Management Regulations Reduce Sprawl? , 2004 .

[33]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Effect of Category Aggregation on Map Comparison , 2004, GIScience.

[34]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change , 2005, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[35]  Kenneth M. Johnson,et al.  Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950-2000 , 2005 .

[36]  Richard G. Lathrop,et al.  Sub-pixel estimation of urban land cover components with linear mixture model analysis and Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery , 2005 .

[37]  M. Alberti.  The Effects of Urban Patterns on Ecosystem Function , 2005 .

[38]  A. Downs.  Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More than We Do It , 2005 .

[39]  A. M. Hersperger,et al.  Driving forces of landscape change - current and new directions , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  Rural and Suburban Sprawl in the U.S. Midwest from 1940 to 2000 and Its Relation to Forest Fragmentation , 2005 .

[41]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Analysis of scale dependencies in an urban land‐use‐change model , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[42]  J. Newell,et al.  Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth management responses and implications for conservation , 2005 .

[43]  William Rand,et al.  Path dependence and the validation of agent‐based spatial models of land use , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[44]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Uncertainty in Extrapolations of Predictive Land-Change Models , 2005 .

[45]  Richard E. Bilsborrow,et al.  The use of a multilevel statistical model to analyze factors influencing land use: a study of the Ecuadorian Amazon , 2005 .

[46]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Ecosystem services , 2005, Current Biology.

[47]  Christopher D. Lippitt,et al.  Can Error Explain Map Differences Over Time? , 2006 .

[48]  Xia Li,et al.  Errors and uncertainties in urban cellular automata , 2006, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[49]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Multilevel modelling of land use from field to village level in the Philippines , 2006 .

[50]  Daniel Müller,et al.  Issues in spatially explicit statistical land-use/cover change (LUCC) models: Examples from western , 2007 .

[51]  E. Lambin,et al.  The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  E. Irwin,et al.  The evolution of urban sprawl: Evidence of spatial heterogeneity and increasing land fragmentation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Michael Howell-Moroney.  Studying the Effects of the Intensity of US State Growth Management Approaches on Land Development Outcomes , 2007 .

[54]  Ross K Meentemeyer,et al.  Early detection of emerging forest disease using dispersal estimation and ecological niche modeling. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[55]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  The movement ecology and dynamics of plant communities in fragmented landscapes , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  C. Lahariya.  The state of the world population 2007: unleashing the potential of urban growth. , 2008, Indian pediatrics.

[57]  J. Alcamo.  Environmental futures : the practice of environmental scenario analysis , 2008 .

[58]  Eric Koomen,et al.  Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change , 2008 .

[59]  Tim Gulden,et al.  The Rise of the Mega-Region , 2008 .

[60]  Xia Li,et al.  Discovering and evaluating urban signatures for simulating compact development using cellular automata , 2008 .

[61]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[62]  Derek T. Robinson,et al.  Modelling carbon storage in highly fragmented and human-dominated landscapes: Linking land-cover patterns and ecosystem models , 2009 .

[63]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  Addressing foundational elements of regional land-use change forecasting , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[64]  Elena G. Irwin,et al.  Towards a comprehensive framework for modeling urban spatial dynamics , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[65]  K. Overmars,et al.  Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[66]  Shaowen Wang,et al.  HPABM: A Hierarchical Parallel Simulation Framework for Spatially‐explicit Agent‐based Models , 2009, Trans. GIS.

[67]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[68]  Douglas M. Johnston,et al.  Designing Landscapes for Performance Based on Emerging Principles in Landscape Ecology , 2009 .

[69]  M. Alberti.  Maintaining ecological integrity and sustaining ecosystem function in urban areas , 2010 .

[70]  M. Ridd,et al.  The V-I-S Model: Quantifying the Urban Environment , 2010 .

[71]  A. Stewart Fotheringham,et al.  Local Forms of Spatial Analysis , 2010 .

[72]  Hao Chen,et al.  Diagnostic tools to evaluate a spatial land change projection along a gradient of an explanatory variable , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[73]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Do birds and beetles show similar responses to urbanization? , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[74]  Andrés Manuel García,et al.  An analysis of the effect of the stochastic component of urban cellular automata models , 2011, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[75]  F. Aguilera,et al.  Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban land use patterns: A case study in a Spanish metropolitan area , 2011 .

[76]  R. Meentemeyer,et al.  Estimating the demand for public open space: Evidence from North Carolina municipalities* , 2012 .

[77]  John B. Vogler,et al.  LiDAR-Landsat data fusion for large-area assessment of urban land cover: Balancing spatial resolution, data volume and mapping accuracy , 2012 .

[78]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  The Ecological Detective , 2013 .

[79]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[80]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Measuring Sprawl and Its Impacts , 2015 .