Orientation discrimination of patterned surfaces through an actuated and non-actuated tactile display

This paper investigates the tactile orientation discrimination of virtual, small-scale, patterned surfaces through a tactile display. The tactile display is an array of 4×4 vertically moving pins which can simulate the shape of small scale features. Its small size and low mass allow users to explore virtual surfaces freely and intuitively. The evaluation method consisted of measuring the orientation discrimination threshold for virtual surfaces with sinusoidal profiles. The threshold was compared with the threshold obtained using a non-actuated tactile display of equal spatial resolution and with the threshold obtained using the bare finger to explore real surfaces. This comparison was done to evaluate the quality of the rendered virtual surfaces, the performance of the device as a control system and the efficiency of the tactile rendering algorithm. This study also measured the speed and normal force during the tactile exploration that allowed investigation of the exploration strategies used when touching through normal indentation displays and through the bare finger. Furthermore they are the necessary interaction parameters for assessing the bandwidth and force output of the device.

[1]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Human Tactile Ability to Discriminate Variations in Small Ridge Patterns thorugh a Portable-Wearable Tactile Display , 2010, 2010 Third International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.

[2]  Allan M. Smith,et al.  Deployment of fingertip forces in tactile exploration , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Free to Touch: A Portable Tactile Display For 3D Surface Texture Exploration , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Toshi Takamori,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of artificial tactile feel display integrated with visual information , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Sensory substitution using tactile pin arrays: Human factors, technology and applications , 2006, Signal Process..

[7]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Vibration Enhances Geometry Perception with Tactile Shape Displays , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[8]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  Tangential versus normal displacements of skin: relative effectiveness for producing tactile sensations , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[9]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[10]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  STReSS: A Practical Tactile Display System with One Millimeter Spatial Resolution and 700 Hz Refresh Rate , 2003 .

[11]  D. Katz The World of Touch , 1989 .

[12]  Martin Buss,et al.  Dynamic display of distributed tactile shape information by a prototypical actuator array , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).