Dynamic spatiotemporal brain analyses of the visual checkerboard task: Similarities and differences between passive and active viewing conditions.

We introduce a new analytic technique for the microsegmentation of high-density EEG to identify the discrete brain microstates evoked by the visual reversal checkerboard task. To test the sensitivity of the present analytic approach to differences in evoked brain microstates across experimental conditions, subjects were instructed to (a) passively view the reversals of the checkerboard (passive viewing condition), or (b) actively search for a target stimulus that may appear at the fixation point, and they were offered a monetary reward if they correctly detected the stimulus (active viewing condition). Results revealed that, within the first 168 ms of a checkerboard presentation, the same four brain microstates were evoked in the passive and active viewing conditions, whereas the brain microstates evoked after 168 ms differed between these two conditions, with more brain microstates elicited in the active than in the passive viewing condition. Additionally, distinctions were found in the active condition between a change in a scalp configuration that reflects a change in microstate and a change in scalp configuration that reflects a change in the level of activation of the same microstate. Finally, the bootstrapping procedure identified that two microstates lacked robustness even though statistical significance thresholds were met, suggesting these microstates should be replicated prior to placing weight on their generalizability across individuals. These results illustrate the utility of the analytic approach and provide new information about the spatiotemporal dynamics of the brain states underlying passive and active viewing in the visual checkerboard task.

[1]  Ivo Provaznik,et al.  Reference-free Identification of Phage DNA Using Signal Processing on Nanopore Data , 2017, 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE).

[2]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Dynamic spatiotemporal brain analyses using high-performance electrical neuroimaging, Part II: A step-by-step tutorial , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  Markus Siegel,et al.  Cortical information flow during flexible sensorimotor decisions , 2015, Science.

[4]  Robin M. Weiss,et al.  Dynamic spatiotemporal brain analyses using high performance electrical neuroimaging: Theoretical framework and validation , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  Erik Asp,et al.  A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Functional Imaging Studies of Social Rejection , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[6]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Erratum: Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2013) 14 (365-376)) , 2013 .

[7]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Jean Decety,et al.  The speed of morality: a high-density electrical neuroimaging study. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  D. Lynch,et al.  Reproducibility Of Visual Scoring Of COPD Phenotypes , 2012, ATS 2012.

[10]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[11]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Understanding Actions of Others: The Electrodynamics of the Left and Right Hemispheres. A High-Density EEG Neuroimaging Study , 2010, PloS one.

[12]  R. Lührmann,et al.  The Crystal Structure of PPIL1 Bound to Cyclosporine A Suggests a Binding Mode for a Linear Epitope of the SKIP Protein , 2010, PloS one.

[13]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Core networks for visual-concrete and abstract thought content: A brain electric microstate analysis , 2010, NeuroImage.

[14]  Johannes Sarnthein,et al.  High test–retest reliability of checkerboard reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP) over 8 months , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Human Intention Understanding in Temporo-Parietal Cortex: A Combined EEG/fMRI Repetition Suppression Paradigm , 2009, PloS one.

[16]  Mathias Currat,et al.  Impact of Selection and Demography on the Diffusion of Lactase Persistence , 2009, PloS one.

[17]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  Differential Recruitment of Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus and Superior Parietal Lobule during Visually Guided Grasping Revealed by Electrical Neuroimaging , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Stephanie Ortigue,et al.  The chronoarchitecture of human sexual desire: A high-density electrical mapping study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[19]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Parvocellular and Magnocellular Contributions to the Initial Generators of the Visual Evoked Potential: High-Density Electrical Mapping of the “C1” Component , 2008, Brain Topography.

[20]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention. , 2007, Emotion.

[21]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of attention. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  Giancarlo Comi,et al.  Source model and scalp topography of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to altitudinal stimuli suggest that infoldings of calcarine fissure are not part of VEP generators , 2005, Brain Topography.

[24]  Hugh E. Williams,et al.  Gradual Transition Detection Using Average Frame Similarity , 2004, 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[25]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. G. Axford,et al.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Affective Judgments of Faces Modulate Early Activity (∼160 ms) within the Fusiform Gyri , 2002, NeuroImage.

[29]  Shozo Tobimatsu Transient and steady-state VEPs—reappraisal , 2002 .

[30]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[31]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Affective judgments of faces modulate early activity (approximately 160 ms) within the fusiform gyri. , 2002, NeuroImage.

[32]  T. V. van Erp,et al.  Reproducibility of visual activation during checkerboard stimulation in functional magnetic resonance imaging at 4 Tesla. , 2001, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Human Cognition. , 1999, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[34]  B. Rossion,et al.  Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing: an ERP study , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  C. Frith,et al.  Monitoring for target objects: activation of right frontal and parietal cortices with increasing time on task , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  T. Koenig,et al.  Brain electric microstates and momentary conscious mind states as building blocks of spontaneous thinking: I. Visual imagery and abstract thoughts. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[37]  Shozo Tobimatsu,et al.  Visual evoked cortical magnetic responses to checkerboard pattern reversal stimulation: A study on the neural generators of N75, P100 and N145 , 1998, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[38]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Microstates in Language-Related Brain Potential Maps Show Noun–Verb Differences , 1996, Brain and Language.

[39]  K. Hugdahl Psychophysiology: The Mind-Body Perspective , 1996 .

[40]  T Locatelli,et al.  Visual evoked potentials generator model derived from different spatial frequency stimuli of visual field regions and magnetic resonance imaging coordinates of V1, V2, V3 areas in man. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[41]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) of the human brain , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[42]  S Noachtar,et al.  Pattern visual evoked potentials recorded from human occipital cortex with chronic subdural electrodes. , 1993, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  G. Malatesta,et al.  Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to altitudinal stimuli: effects of stimulus manipulations on VEP scalp topography , 1993 .

[44]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Striate cortical contribution to the surface-recorded pattern-reversal vep in the alert monkey , 1991, Vision Research.

[45]  A. Ducati,et al.  Neuronal generators of the visual evoked potentials: intracerebral recording in awake humans. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[46]  D Lehmann,et al.  EEG alpha map series: brain micro-states by space-oriented adaptive segmentation. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[47]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Principles of spatial analysis , 1987 .

[48]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man—a review , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.

[49]  J. Fermaglich Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[50]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[51]  D Lehmann,et al.  Checkerboard-evoked potentials: topography and latency for onset, offset, and reversal. , 1980, Progress in brain research.

[52]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .