Priority-Setting Methods for Plural Policymaking Bodies

Priority-setting methods for policy boards must address both multiple criteria for choosing among alternative policies and the differing values of individual board members. Four techniques that might be appropriate for policy boards are decision analysis, simplified multiattribute rating technique, analytic hierarchy process, and social judgment theory. These techniques differ in approach, implementation, complexity, cognitive style, time required, and information demands. Factors to consider before using one of these techniques include what roles board members and staff should play, how individuals' opinions should be aggregated, and whether the political conditions exist that make it feasible to use the technique.

[1]  Gloria A. Grizzle,et al.  Plural Policy-Making Bodies , 1982 .

[2]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making, Kyoto, 1975 , 1976 .

[3]  David M. Lane,et al.  Measuring the importance of cues in policy capturing , 1982 .

[4]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[5]  Richard C. Larson,et al.  Police deployment : new tools for planners , 1978 .

[6]  F. Hutton Barron,et al.  Reference effects: A sheep in Wolf's clothing☆ , 1980 .

[7]  D. A. Seaver,et al.  A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making , 1981 .

[8]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Evaluating Alternatives Involving Potential Fatalities , 1980, Oper. Res..

[9]  J. Rohrbaugh,et al.  1 – SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY: APPLICATIONS IN POLICY FORMATION , 1977 .

[10]  R. John,et al.  A criterion validation of multiattribute utility analysis and of group communication strategy , 1980 .

[11]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  B. Hobbs A COMPARISON OF WEIGHTING METHODS IN POWER PLANT SITING , 1980 .

[13]  C. Hwang Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[14]  C. C. Waid,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models , 1982 .

[15]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  A theory of analytical hierarchies applied to political candidacy , 1977 .

[16]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Estimating Coefficients in Linear Models: It Don't Make No Nevermind , 1976 .

[17]  M. W. Klein,et al.  Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation , 1980 .

[18]  Reference effects in multiattribute evaluations , 1979 .

[19]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[20]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[21]  Simon French,et al.  Applied Decision Analysis. , 1985 .

[22]  T. R. Stewart,et al.  Analysis of Judgment Policy: A New Approach for Citizen Participation in Planning , 1976 .

[23]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Assessment errors in multiattribute utility functions , 1980 .

[24]  L. Urwick,et al.  Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett , 1942 .

[25]  Robert S. Billings,et al.  Measures of compensatory and noncompensatory models of decision behavior: Process tracing versus policy capturing , 1983 .

[26]  K. R. Hammond Externalizing the Parameters of Quasirational Thought , 1976 .

[27]  D. E. Bell,et al.  Conflicting Objectives in Decisions , 1978 .

[28]  Gordon F. Pitz,et al.  Assessing the utility of multiattribute utility assessments , 1980 .

[29]  Leonard Adelman,et al.  A case history of the application of social judgment theory to policy formulation , 1975 .

[30]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  A Simple Multiattribute Utility Procedure for Evaluation , 1977 .

[31]  Ralph L. Keeney Evaluation of Proposed Storage Sites , 1979, Oper. Res..

[32]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral Decision Theory , 1977 .

[33]  M. Doherty,et al.  A social judgment theoretic approach to sex discrimination in faculty salaries , 1978 .

[34]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Decision Making: SOURCES OF BIAS IN ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR UTILITY FUNCTIONS , 1982 .

[35]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Multiattribute evaluation reference effects: A reply to Barron and John , 1980 .

[36]  J. Rohrbaugh,et al.  Judgment Analysis in Policy Formation: A New Method for Improving Public Participation , 1978 .

[37]  Robert Perloff,et al.  Evaluator Interventions: Pros and Cons , 1980 .