A constructive nonlinear array (CNA) method for barely visible impact detection in composite materials

Currently there are numerous phased array techniques such as Full Matrix Capture (FMC) and Total Focusing Method (TFM) that provide good damage assessment for composite materials. Although, linear methods struggle to evaluate and assess low levels of damage, while nonlinear methods have shown great promise in early damage detection. A sweep and subtraction evaluation method coupled with a constructive nonlinear array method (CNA) is proposed in order to assess damage specific nonlinearities, address issues with frequency selection when using nonlinear ultrasound imaging techniques and reduce equipment generated nonlinearities. These methods were evaluated using multiple excitation locations on an impacted composite panel with a complex damage (barely visible impact damage). According to various recent works, damage excitation can be accentuated by exciting at local defect resonance (LDR) frequencies; although these frequencies are not always easily determinable. The sweep methodology uses broadband excitation to determine both local defect and material resonances, by assessing local defect generated nonlinearities using a laser vibrometer it is possible to assess which frequencies excite the complex geometry of the crack. The dual effect of accurately determining local defect resonances, the use of an image subtraction method and the reduction of equipment based nonlinearities using CNA result in greater repeatability and clearer nonlinear imaging (NIM).

[1]  Kyung-Young Jhang,et al.  Nonlinear ultrasonic techniques for nondestructive assessment of micro damage in material: A review , 2009 .

[2]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Instantaneous reference-free crack detection based on polarization characteristics of piezoelectric materials , 2007 .

[3]  Michele Meo,et al.  Nonlinear imaging (NIM) of flaws in a complex composite stiffened panel using a constructive nonlinear array (CNA) technique , 2017, Ultrasonics.

[4]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A Nonlinear Acoustic Technique for Crack Detection in Metallic Structures , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[5]  Otto Buck,et al.  Acoustic harmonic generation due to fatigue damage in high‐strength aluminum , 1979 .

[6]  Tribikram Kundu,et al.  Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation : Engineering and Biological Material Characterization , 2003 .

[7]  Francesco Ciampa,et al.  Nonlinear ultrasound modelling and validation of fatigue damage , 2015 .

[8]  Alexander Sutin,et al.  Vibro-Acoustic Modulation Nondestructive Evaluation Technique , 1998, Smart Structures.

[9]  Leon M Keer,et al.  Mathematical modelling of ultrasonic wave scattering by sub-surface cracks , 1986 .

[10]  P. Wilcox,et al.  Global crack detection using bispectral analysis , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  Michele Meo,et al.  Residual fatigue life estimation using a nonlinear ultrasound modulation method , 2015 .

[12]  G. Busse,et al.  A local defect resonance to enhance acoustic wave-defect interaction in ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation , 2011 .

[13]  J. Krautkrämer,et al.  Ultrasonic Testing of Materials , 1969 .