Capturing Scientific Knowledge for Water Resources Sustainability in the Rio Grande Area

This paper presents our experience in capturing scientific knowledge for enabling the creation of user-defined modeling scenarios that combine availability and use of water resources with potential climate in the middle Rio Grande region. The knowledge representation models in this project were created and validated by an international, interdisciplinary team of scientists and engineers. These models enable the automated generation of water optimization models and visualization of output data and provenance traces that support the reuse of scientific knowledge. Our efforts include an educational and outreach component to enable students and a wide variety of stakeholders (e.g., farmers, city planners, and general public) to access and run water models. Our approach, the Integrated Water Sustainability Modeling Framework, uses ontologies and light-weight standards such as JSON-LD to enable the exchange of data across the different components of the system and third-party tools, including modeling and visualization tools. Future work includes the ability to automatically integrate further models (i.e., model integration).

[1]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Characterising performance of environmental models , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  The EMBeRS project: employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis , 2016, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

[3]  Li An,et al.  Analyzing Human–Landscape Interactions: Tools That Integrate , 2013, Environmental Management.

[4]  D. Gutzler Regional climatic considerations for borderlands sustainability , 2013 .

[5]  B. Lehner,et al.  Water on an Urban Planet: Urbanization and the Reach of Urban Water Infrastructure , 2014 .

[6]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Freshwater ecosystem services supporting humans: Pivoting from water crisis to water solutions , 2015 .

[7]  Pierre-Antoine Champin,et al.  JSON-LD 1.1 – A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data , 2019 .

[8]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Casey Walsh Water infrastructures in the U.S./Mexico borderlands , 2013 .

[10]  Zhuping Sheng Impacts of groundwater pumping and climate variability on groundwater availability in the Rio Grande Basin , 2013 .

[11]  F. Ward,et al.  Economic performance of irrigation capacity development to adapt to climate in the American Southwest , 2016 .

[12]  Deana D. Pennington,et al.  ELSEWeb Meets SADI: Supporting Data-to-Model Integration for Biodiversity Forecasting , 2013, AAAI Fall Symposia.

[13]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  PROV-O: The PROV Ontology , 2013 .

[14]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  Provenance: An Introduction to PROV , 2013, Provenance.

[15]  Núria Queralt-Rosinach,et al.  The Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO) for biomedical research and knowledge discovery , 2014, J. Biomed. Semant..

[16]  Alexey A. Voinov,et al.  An overview of the model integration process: From pre-integration assessment to testing , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  Smriti Rajkarnikar Tamrakar Describing Data And Workflow Provenance Using Design Patterns And Controlled Vocabularies , 2017 .

[18]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science , 2015 .

[19]  John A. Kunze,et al.  Dublin Core Metadata for Resource Discovery , 1998, RFC.

[20]  Dan Brickley,et al.  Schema.org: Evolution of Structured Data on the Web , 2015, ACM Queue.