Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Summary Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and foreign bodies within the patient’s body may be confused with a pathology or may reduce the quality of examinations. Radiologists are frequently not informed about the medical history of patients and face postoperative/other images they are not familiar with. A gallery of such images was presented in this manuscript. A truncation artifact in the spinal cord could be misinterpreted as a syrinx. Motion artifacts caused by breathing, cardiac movement, CSF pulsation/blood flow create a ghost artifact which can be reduced by patient immobilization, or cardiac/respiratory gating. Aliasing artifacts can be eliminated by increasing the field of view. An artificially hyperintense signal on FLAIR images can result from magnetic susceptibility artifacts, CSF/vascular pulsation, motion, but can also be found in patients undergoing MRI examinations while receiving supplemental oxygen. Metallic and other foreign bodies which may be found on and in patients’ bodies are the main group of artifacts and these are the focus of this study: e.g. make-up, tattoos, hairbands, clothes, endovascular embolization, prostheses, surgical clips, intraorbital and other medical implants, etc. Knowledge of different types of artifacts and their origin, and of possible foreign bodies is necessary to eliminate them or to reduce their negative influence on MR images by adjusting acquisition parameters. It is also necessary to take them into consideration when interpreting the images. Some proposals of reducing artifacts have been mentioned. Describing in detail the procedures to avoid or limit the artifacts would go beyond the scope of this paper but technical ways to reduce them can be found in the cited literature.

[1]  V B Ho,et al.  Chemical shift: the artifact and clinical tool revisited. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  Interactions between magnetic resonance imaging and dental material , 2013, Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences.

[3]  MRI Artifacts : Mechanism and Control , .

[4]  Srinivasan Kathiravan,et al.  A Review on Potential Issues and Challenges in MR Imaging , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[5]  C. Price,et al.  MR imaging artifacts produced by dental materials. , 1987, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[6]  P. Knott,et al.  A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  R. McKinstry,et al.  Principles and applications of echo-planar imaging: a review for the general radiologist. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  E. Haacke,et al.  Artifacts caused by cosmetics in MR imaging of the head. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  C. Yasuda,et al.  Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects. , 2009, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[10]  J. Pickard,et al.  Magnetic field interactions in adjustable hydrocephalus shunts. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[11]  John M Pauly,et al.  Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  S. Vinitski,et al.  Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. , 1994, Radiology.

[13]  Martin J Graves,et al.  Body MRI artifacts in clinical practice: A physicist's and radiologist's perspective , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  I. Saatci,et al.  CT and MR imaging findings and their implications in the follow-up of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with endosaccular occlusion with onyx. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  E. Jacobsen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation after implantation of a titanium cervical disc prosthesis: a comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnet strength , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[16]  J. Cha,et al.  Practical Application of Iterative Decomposition of Water and Fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least-Squares Estimation (IDEAL) Imaging in Minimizing Metallic Artifacts , 2012, Korean journal of radiology.

[17]  S. Stuckey,et al.  Hyperintensity in the subarachnoid space on FLAIR MRI. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  C. Pierre-jerome,et al.  MRI of the spine and spinal cord: imaging techniques, normal anatomy, artifacts, and pitfalls. , 2000, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[19]  H. Jara,et al.  Application of basic physics principles to clinical neuroradiology: differentiating artifacts from true pathology on MRI. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Garry Gold,et al.  Advances in musculoskeletal MRI: Technical considerations , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.