Using Physiological Synchrony as an Indicator of Collaboration Quality, Task Performance and Learning

Over the last decade, there has been a renewed interest in capturing 21st century skills using new data collection tools. In this paper, we leverage an existing dataset where multimodal sensors (mobile eye- trackers, motion sensors, galvanic skin response wristbands) were used to identify markers of productive collaborations. The data came from 42 pairs (N = 84) of participants who had no coding experience. They were asked to program a robot to solve a variety of mazes. We explored four different measures of physiological synchrony: Signal Matching (SM), Instantaneous Derivative Matching (IDM), Directional Agreement (DA) and Pearson’s Correlation (PC). Overall, we found PC to be positively associated with learning gains and DA with collaboration quality. We compare those results with prior studies and discuss implications for measuring collaborative process through physiological sensors.

[1]  Jie Xu,et al.  Shared Experiences of Technology and Trust: An Experimental Study of Physiological Compliance Between Active and Passive Users in Technology-Mediated Collaborative Encounters , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[2]  Akane Sano,et al.  Automatic identification of artifacts in electrodermal activity data , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[3]  R. Henning,et al.  Social psychophysiological compliance in a four-person research team. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  N. Ravaja,et al.  Physiological Linkage of Dyadic Gaming Experience , 2014 .

[5]  Adam W. Hoover,et al.  Physiological compliance and team performance. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Empatica E3 — A wearable wireless multi-sensor device for real-time computerized biofeedback and data acquisition , 2014 .

[7]  M. C. Gil,et al.  Social-physiological compliance as a determinant of team performance. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[8]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Investigating collaborative learning success with physiological coupling indices based on electrodermal activity , 2016, LAK.

[9]  David Weintrop,et al.  Using Commutative Assessments to Compare Conceptual Understanding in Blocks-based and Text-based Programs , 2015, ICER.

[10]  Guillaume Chanel,et al.  Physiological compliance for social gaming analysis: Cooperative versus competitive play , 2012, Interact. Comput..

[11]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .

[12]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[13]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  Emotion Sensors Go To School , 2009, AIED.

[14]  Marcelo Worsley,et al.  Multimodal Learning Analytics and Education Data Mining: using computational technologies to measure complex learning tasks , 2016, J. Learn. Anal..

[15]  Jürgen Buder,et al.  Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..