Use of Risk Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment in Decision Making: A Common Policy Research Agenda

Quantitative risk assessment (RA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) are both analytical tools used to support decision making in environmental management. They have been developed and used by largely separate groups of specialists, and it is worth considering whether there is a common research agenda that may increase the relevance of these tools in decision‐making processes. The validity of drawing comparisons between use of the tools is established through examining key aspects of the two approaches for their similarities and differences, including the nature of each approach and contextual and methodological aspects. Six case studies involving use of each approach in public decision making are described and used to draw out concerns about using RA and LCA in this context. The following categories of concern can be distinguished: philosophical approach of the tools; quantitative versus qualitative assessment; stakeholder participation; the nature of the results; and the usefulness of the results in relation to time and financial resource requirements. These can be distilled into a common policy research agenda focusing on: the legitimacy of using tools built on a particular perspective in decision making; recognition and role of value judgments in RA and LCA; treatment of uncertainty and variability; the influence of analytical tools in focusing attention on particular aspects of a decision‐making situation; and understandability of the results for nonspecialists. It is concluded that it is time to bring together the experiences of RA and LCA specialists and benefit from cross‐fertilization of ideas.

[1]  W. Ruckelshaus Science, risk, and public policy. , 1983, Science.

[2]  Division on Earth Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process , 1983 .

[3]  J. Mumpower,et al.  Risk Analysis and Risk Management: An Historical Perspective , 1985 .

[4]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States , 1985 .

[5]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  J. Ravetz Usable Knowledge, Usable Ignorance , 1987 .

[7]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[8]  W. E. Franklin,et al.  Resource and environmental profile analysis: A life cycle environmental assessment for products and procedures , 1992 .

[9]  A. Mazur The Hazards of Risk Assessment , 1992 .

[10]  I. Ziomas,et al.  Uncertainties in chemical risk assessment: Results of a European benchmark exercise , 1992 .

[11]  S. Breyer Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation , 1993 .

[12]  E. Iso,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty and Probability: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1995 .

[13]  Roland Clift,et al.  Life cycle assessment and ecolabelling , 1993 .

[14]  R. McClellan A commentary on the NRC report "Science and judgment in risk assessment". , 1994, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[15]  Graham,et al.  Risk vs. Risk , 1995 .

[16]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  M. Mccally,et al.  Positively Parents: Caring for a Severely Disabled Child; Taking Care; Running a Team for Disabled Children and Their Families; The Integration of Disabled Children into Mainstream Education: Ambitions, Theories and Practices , 1995 .

[18]  D. Hattis Variability in susceptibility - how big, how often, for what responses to what agents? , 1996, Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.

[19]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[20]  W. Leiss Three Phases in the Evolution of Risk Communication Practice , 1996 .

[21]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Part II: spatial differentiation in life-cycle assessment via the site-dependent characterisation of environmental impact from emissions , 1997 .

[22]  M. Morris Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[23]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Brent Spar Controversy: An Example of Risk Communication Gone Wrong , 1997 .

[24]  H. Haes,et al.  Life cycle assessment : State-of-the-Art and research priorities : results of LCANET, a concerted action in the Environment and Climate Programme(DGXII) , 1997 .

[25]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[26]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Commentary: Uncertainty Analysis in Risk Assessment , 1998 .

[27]  R. M. Bras-Klapwijk Are life cycle assessments a threat to sound public policy making? , 1998 .

[28]  Grant Jordan Indirect Causes And Effects In Policy Change: The Brent Spar Case , 1998 .

[29]  L. McCarty,et al.  A comparative analysis of environmental risk assessment/risk management frameworks , 1998 .

[30]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Uncertainty in life cycle impact assessment of toxic releases practical experiences - arguments for a reductionalistic approach? , 1998 .

[31]  Ortwin Renn Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges , 1998 .

[32]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment , 1998 .

[33]  T. Horlick-Jones,et al.  Meaning and contextualisation in risk assessment , 1998 .

[34]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  On the Use of the Term Uncertainty , 1998 .

[35]  Veerle Heyvaert The changing role of science in environmental regulatory decision-making in the European Union , 1999 .

[36]  R. M. Bras-Klapwijk Adjusting Life Cycle Assessment Methodology for Use in Public Policy Discourse , 1999 .

[37]  S. Ryding ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[38]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  An evaluative framework for conceptual and analytical approaches used in environmental management , 1999 .

[39]  Henri Lecouls,et al.  ISO 14043: Environmental management · life cycle assessment · life cycle interpretation , 1999 .

[40]  R P Rechard,et al.  Historical Relationship Between Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal and Other Types of Risk Assessment , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[41]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Mixed Levels of Uncertainty in Complex Policy Models , 1999 .

[42]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Philosophy of science, policy sciences and the basis of decision support with LCA Based on the toxicity controversy in Sweden and the Netherlands , 2000 .

[43]  D. Vogel,et al.  The Changing Character of Regulation: A Comparison of Europe and the United States , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[44]  Risk and Regulation: Boat Owners' Perceptions of Recent Antifouling Legislation , 2001 .

[45]  Derek J. Knight,et al.  Annex: Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 Concerning the Placing of Biocidal Products on the Market , 2002 .

[46]  Gregory A Norris Life cycle emission distributions within the economy: implications for life cycle impact assessment. , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.