Focus on health information technology, electronic health records and their financial impact: Prescribers' expectations and barriers to electronic prescribing of controlled substances

OBJECTIVE To better understand barriers associated with the adoption and use of electronic prescribing of controlled substances (EPCS), a practice recently established by US Drug Enforcement Administration regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prescribers of controlled substances affiliated with a regional health system were surveyed regarding current electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) activities, current prescribing of controlled substances, and expectations and barriers to the adoption of EPCS. RESULTS 246 prescribers (response rate of 64%) represented a range of medical specialties, with 43.1% of these prescribers current users of e-prescribing for non-controlled substances. Reported issues with controlled substances included errors, pharmacy call-backs, and diversion; most prescribers expected EPCS to address many of these problems, specifically reduce medical errors, improve work flow and efficiency of practice, help identify prescription diversion or misuse, and improve patient treatment management. Prescribers expected, however, that it would be disruptive to practice, and over one-third of respondents reported that carrying a security authentication token at all times would be so burdensome as to discourage adoption. DISCUSSION Although adoption of e-prescribing has been shown to dramatically reduce medication errors, challenges to efficient processes and errors still persist from the perspective of the prescriber, that may interfere with the adoption of EPCS. Most prescribers regarded EPCS security measures as a small or moderate inconvenience (other than carrying a security token), with advantages outweighing the burden. CONCLUSION Prescribers are optimistic about the potential for EPCS to improve practice, but view certain security measures as a burden and potential barrier.

[1]  C. Marano,et al.  To err is human. Building a safer health system , 2005 .

[2]  Roger B. Davis,et al.  Overrides of medication alerts in ambulatory care. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[4]  S. Schnoll,et al.  Prescription opioid abuse among enrollees into methadone maintenance treatment. , 2007, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[5]  N. Goldfarb,et al.  “The Costs of a National Health Information Network” , 2005 .

[6]  D. Diamond,et al.  Hand-held electronic prescribing. , 2001, The Journal of family practice.

[7]  J. Benneyan,et al.  National addictions vigilance intervention and prevention program (NAVIPPRO™): a real‐time, product‐specific, public health surveillance system for monitoring prescription drug abuse , 2008, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[8]  Joy M Grossman Even when physicians adopt e-prescribing, use of advanced features lags. , 2010, Issue brief.

[9]  Kate L Lapane,et al.  Roadblock on the health IT superhighway: e-prescribing and the Controlled Substances Act. , 2007, Journal of opioid management.

[10]  R. Dvorkin,et al.  Prescriptions for schedule II opioids and benzodiazepines increase after the introduction of computer-generated prescriptions. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[11]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  P. Aspden,et al.  Preventing Medication Errors , 2007 .

[14]  D. Bates,et al.  The Costs of a National Health Information Network , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. , 1998, JAMA.

[16]  D. Bates,et al.  Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  A. Fayaz-Bakhsh,et al.  The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention , 2014, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.

[18]  Remy R Coeytaux,et al.  Effect of a computerized prescriber-order-entry system on reported medication errors. , 2005, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[19]  Robyn Tamblyn,et al.  The development and evaluation of an integrated electronic prescribing and drug management system for primary care. , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[20]  John F Hurdle,et al.  High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  Erika L. Abramson,et al.  Electronic Prescribing Improves Medication Safety in Community-Based Office Practices , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[22]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .