Improving species-specific plot volume estimates based on airborne laser scanning and image data using alpha shape metrics and balanced field data

Abstract Airborne laser scanning (ALS) data with sparse point densities are increasingly used for forest growing stock estimations. The area-level point distributions derived by ALS are not considered informative on tree species, however, and the required information is typically produced using an additional data source, such as spectral images. We developed new volumetric and structural features (so called alpha shape metrics), hypothesizing that these could produce additional information on the species‐size variation as compared to the previously used ALS and image features. These metrics were tested in the prediction of species-specific, plot-level volume using the Most Similar Neighbor imputation method and a data set consisting of altogether 426 training and 142 validation field plots. The considered forest area was dominated by Scots pine, while Norway spruce and deciduous trees formed the other two species groups to be distinguished. The developed metrics improved the species-specific estimates by 13–30 or 2–4 percentage points compared to features based on ALS data alone or a combination of the ALS and image features, respectively. The metrics had a higher importance when the reference data insufficiently covered the species‐size variation within the area. Although the estimates produced using a combination of the ALS and image data had a superior accuracy compared to those produced by the ALS data alone, the results indicate that species-specific estimates may be further improved by developing computational features based on ALS data.

[1]  E. Næsset,et al.  Improving k-nearest neighbor predictions in forest inventories by combining high and low density airborne laser scanning data , 2012 .

[2]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Improved estimates of forest vegetation structure and biomass with a LiDAR‐optimized sampling design , 2009 .

[3]  A. Pekkarinen,et al.  Local radiometric correction of digital aerial photographs for multi source forest inventory , 2004 .

[4]  E. Næsset,et al.  Non-parametric prediction of diameter distributions using airborne laser scanner data , 2009 .

[5]  R. Nelson,et al.  Determining forest canopy characteristics using airborne laser data , 1984 .

[6]  Richard G. Oderwald,et al.  Forest Volume and Biomass Estimation Using Small-Footprint Lidar-Distributional Parameters on a Per-Segment Basis , 2006 .

[7]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Tree species classification using airborne LiDAR - effects of stand and tree parameters, downsizing of training set, intensity normalization, and sensor type , 2010 .

[8]  Petteri Packalen,et al.  Using airborne laser scanning data and digital aerial photographs to estimate growing stock by tree species , 2009 .

[9]  Kari T. Korhonen,et al.  Inventory by Compartments , 2006 .

[10]  B. Sorin,et al.  DOCTORAL THESIS (SUMMARY) , 2013 .

[11]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  The role of ground reference data collection in the prediction of stem volume with LiDAR data in mountain areas , 2011 .

[12]  Petteri Packalen,et al.  Identification of Scandinavian Commercial Species of Individual Trees from Airborne Laser Scanning Data Using Alpha Shape Metrics , 2009 .

[13]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Airborne laser scanning based stand level management inventory in Finland. , 2011 .

[14]  Björn Nilsson,et al.  National Inventory of Landscapes in Sweden (NILS)—scope, design, and experiences from establishing a multiscale biodiversity monitoring system , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[15]  M. Torma,et al.  ESTIMATION OF TREE SPECIES PROPORTIONS OF FOREST STANDS USING LASER SCANNING , 2000 .

[16]  A. Hudak,et al.  Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR data , 2008 .

[17]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  Growing stock estimation for alpine forests in Austria: a robust lidar-based approach , 2009 .

[18]  Suomen metsävarat 2004-2005 , 1970 .

[19]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Effects of pulse density on predicting characteristics of individual trees of Scandinavian commercial species using alpha shape metrics based on airborne laser scanning data , 2008 .

[20]  S. Popescu,et al.  Measuring individual tree crown diameter with lidar and assessing its influence on estimating forest volume and biomass , 2003 .

[21]  B. Koch,et al.  Non-parametric prediction and mapping of standing timber volume and biomass in a temperate forest: application of multiple optical/LiDAR-derived predictors , 2010 .

[22]  Mikko Inkinen,et al.  A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Identifying species of individual trees using airborne laser scanner , 2004 .

[24]  E. Næsset,et al.  Classifying species of individual trees by intensity and structure features derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2009 .

[25]  Albert R. Stage,et al.  Most Similar Neighbor: An Improved Sampling Inference Procedure for Natural Resource Planning , 1995, Forest Science.

[26]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Species identification of individual trees by combining high resolution LiDAR data with multi‐spectral images , 2008 .

[27]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Comparing stand inventories for large areas based on photo-interpretation and laser scanning by means of cost-plus-loss analyses , 2004 .

[28]  Felix Morsdorf,et al.  Understory trees in airborne LiDAR data — Selective mapping due to transmission losses and echo-triggering mechanisms , 2012 .

[29]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Different plot selection strategies for field training data in ALS-assisted forest , 2010 .

[30]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Three-dimensional alpha shapes , 1994, ACM Trans. Graph..

[31]  Jörgen Wallerman,et al.  Estimating field-plot data of forest stands using airborne laser scanning and SPOT HRG data , 2007 .

[32]  M. Maltamo,et al.  The k-MSN method for the prediction of species-specific stand attributes using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs , 2007 .

[33]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[34]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Combining ALS and NFI training data for forest management planning: a case study in Kuortane, Western Finland , 2009, European Journal of Forest Research.

[35]  M. Gruber,et al.  The Ultracam Large Format Aerial Digital Camera System , 2003 .

[36]  W. Stuetzle,et al.  Capturing tree crown formation through implicit surface reconstruction using airborne lidar data , 2009 .

[37]  Maria Villikka,et al.  The suitability of leaf-off airborne laser scanning data in an area-based forest inventory of coniferous and deciduous trees , 2012 .

[38]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  yaImpute: An R Package for kNN Imputation , 2008 .

[39]  E. Næsset,et al.  Laser scanning of forest resources: the nordic experience , 2004 .

[40]  Mikko Kolehmainen,et al.  Neural Networks for the Prediction of Species-Specific Plot Volumes Using Airborne Laser Scanning and Aerial Photographs , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[41]  Yong Q. Tian,et al.  Estimating Basal Area and Stem Volume for Individual Trees from Lidar Data , 2007 .

[42]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[43]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Applied 3D texture features in ALS-based forest inventory , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[44]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Imputation of single-tree attributes using airborne laser scanning-based height, intensity, and alpha shape metrics , 2010 .

[45]  Peter Axelsson,et al.  Processing of laser scanner data-algorithms and applications , 1999 .

[46]  P. Axelsson DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[47]  Manfred Näslund,et al.  Skogsförsöksanstaltens gallringsförsök i tallskog , 1936 .