Comparison of Measurement Methods for 2–150-kHz Conducted Emissions in Power Networks

This article presents a comparison of measurement methods for current and voltage distortions in low-voltage networks in the frequency range from 2 to 150 kHz (supraharmonics). The comparison encompasses the methods informatively described in IEC and CISPR international standards, as well as other innovative techniques presented in the literature. This work is carried out within a novel framework that includes advanced and complex synthetic test signals, as well as real grid recordings that allow an accurate comparison of the performance of the tested methods. Specifically designed indices are employed to characterize the accuracy of the tested methods in the frequency and amplitude assessments. In light of that, the strengths and weaknesses of the methods are identified. The results of this article contribute to the ongoing standardization work carried out by the IEC SC77A/WG9 with the purpose of defining a normative measurement method suitable for assessing grid disturbance levels in the range from 2 to 150 kHz.

[1]  Vladimir Cuk,et al.  Power quality and EMC issues with future electricity networks , 2018 .

[2]  Itziar Angulo,et al.  Field Trials for the Characterization of Non-Intentional Emissions at Low-Voltage Grid in the Frequency Range Assigned to NB-PLC Technologies , 2019 .

[3]  David de la Vega,et al.  A new voltage probe with improved performance at the 10 kHz–500 kHz frequency range for field measurements in LV networks , 2019, Measurement.

[4]  Grevener Anne,et al.  Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2 – 150 kHz (Supraharmonics) , 2018, 2018 IEEE 9th International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS).

[5]  Xiaodong Liang,et al.  Emerging Power Quality Challenges Due to Integration of Renewable Energy Sources , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[6]  P. Russer,et al.  Quasi-peak detector model for a time-domain measurement system , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[7]  Sasa Z. Djokic,et al.  Power Quality Concerns in Implementing Smart Distribution-Grid Applications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  Stefano Lodetti,et al.  A Robust Wavelet-Based Hybrid Method for the Simultaneous Measurement of Harmonic and Supraharmonic Distortion , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[9]  Paulo F. Ribeiro,et al.  On waveform distortion in the frequency range of 2 kHz–150 kHz—Review and research challenges , 2017 .

[10]  Itziar Angulo,et al.  Characterization of non-intentional emissions from distributed energy resources up to 500 kHz: A case study in Spain , 2019, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[11]  Wei Zhao,et al.  A High-Resolution Algorithm for Supraharmonic Analysis Based on Multiple Measurement Vectors and Bayesian Compressive Sensing , 2019, Energies.

[12]  Jan Meyer,et al.  Comparative analysis of the measurement methods for the supraharmonic range , 2020, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[13]  Matthias Klatt,et al.  Comparison of measurement methods for the frequency range of 2 kHz to 150 kHz , 2014, 2014 16th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP).

[14]  Qing Wang,et al.  New Measurement Algorithm for Supraharmonics Based on Multiple Measurement Vectors Model and Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[15]  Jiri Drapela,et al.  Proposal of a Desynchronized Processing Technique for Assessing High-Frequency Distortion in Power Systems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  Andreas Abart,et al.  EMI of emissions in the frequency range 2 kHz - 150 kHz , 2013 .

[17]  Victor Khokhlov,et al.  Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2–150 kHz (Supraharmonics) Based on the Present Standards Framework , 2020, IEEE Access.

[18]  Danton Diego Ferreira,et al.  Supraharmonic analysis by filter bank and compressive sensing , 2019, Electric Power Systems Research.