Comparison of Measurement Methods for 2–150-kHz Conducted Emissions in Power Networks
暂无分享,去创建一个
Victor Khokhlov | David de la Vega | Deborah Ritzmann | Stefano Lodetti | Alexander Gallarreta | Paul Wright | Jan Meyer | Igor Fernández | Dimitrij Klingbeil | P. Wright | D. de la Vega | Jan Meyer | I. Fernández | S. Lodetti | A. Gallarreta | D. Ritzmann | V. Khokhlov | Dimitrij Klingbeil
[1] Vladimir Cuk,et al. Power quality and EMC issues with future electricity networks , 2018 .
[2] Itziar Angulo,et al. Field Trials for the Characterization of Non-Intentional Emissions at Low-Voltage Grid in the Frequency Range Assigned to NB-PLC Technologies , 2019 .
[3] David de la Vega,et al. A new voltage probe with improved performance at the 10 kHz–500 kHz frequency range for field measurements in LV networks , 2019, Measurement.
[4] Grevener Anne,et al. Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2 – 150 kHz (Supraharmonics) , 2018, 2018 IEEE 9th International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS).
[5] Xiaodong Liang,et al. Emerging Power Quality Challenges Due to Integration of Renewable Energy Sources , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.
[6] P. Russer,et al. Quasi-peak detector model for a time-domain measurement system , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.
[7] Sasa Z. Djokic,et al. Power Quality Concerns in Implementing Smart Distribution-Grid Applications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.
[8] Stefano Lodetti,et al. A Robust Wavelet-Based Hybrid Method for the Simultaneous Measurement of Harmonic and Supraharmonic Distortion , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.
[9] Paulo F. Ribeiro,et al. On waveform distortion in the frequency range of 2 kHz–150 kHz—Review and research challenges , 2017 .
[10] Itziar Angulo,et al. Characterization of non-intentional emissions from distributed energy resources up to 500 kHz: A case study in Spain , 2019, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.
[11] Wei Zhao,et al. A High-Resolution Algorithm for Supraharmonic Analysis Based on Multiple Measurement Vectors and Bayesian Compressive Sensing , 2019, Energies.
[12] Jan Meyer,et al. Comparative analysis of the measurement methods for the supraharmonic range , 2020, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.
[13] Matthias Klatt,et al. Comparison of measurement methods for the frequency range of 2 kHz to 150 kHz , 2014, 2014 16th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP).
[14] Qing Wang,et al. New Measurement Algorithm for Supraharmonics Based on Multiple Measurement Vectors Model and Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.
[15] Jiri Drapela,et al. Proposal of a Desynchronized Processing Technique for Assessing High-Frequency Distortion in Power Systems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.
[16] Andreas Abart,et al. EMI of emissions in the frequency range 2 kHz - 150 kHz , 2013 .
[17] Victor Khokhlov,et al. Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2–150 kHz (Supraharmonics) Based on the Present Standards Framework , 2020, IEEE Access.
[18] Danton Diego Ferreira,et al. Supraharmonic analysis by filter bank and compressive sensing , 2019, Electric Power Systems Research.