The acute effects of continuous and conditional neuromodulation on the bladder in spinal cord injury

Study design: Laboratory investigation using serial slow-fill cystometrograms.Objectives: To examine the acute effects of different modes of dorsal penile nerve stimulation on detrusor hyperreflexia, bladder capacity and bladder compliance in spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting: Spinal Injuries Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK.Methods: Fourteen SCI patients were examined. Microtip transducer catheters enabled continuous measurement of anal sphincter, urethral sphincter and intravesical pressures. Control cystometrograms were followed by stimulation of the dorsal penile nerve at 15 Hz, 200 μs pulse width and amplitude equal to twice that which produced a pudendo-anal reflex. Stimulation was either continuous or in bursts of one minute triggered by a rise in detrusor pressure of 10 cm water (conditional). Further control cystometrograms were then performed to examine the residual effects of stimulation.Results: Bladder capacity increased significantly during three initial control fills. Continuous stimulation (n=6) significantly increased bladder capacity by a mean of 110% (±Standard Deviation 85%) or 173 ml (±146 ml), and bladder compliance by a mean of 53% (±31%). Conditional stimulation in a different group of patients (n=6) significantly increased bladder capacity, by 144% (±127%) or 230 ml (±143 ml). In the conditional neuromodulation experiments, the gap between suppressed contractions fell reliably as bladder volume increased, and the time from start of stimulation to peak of intravesical pressure and 50% decline in intravesical pressure rise was 2.8 s (±0.9 s) and 7.6 s (±1.0s) respectively. The two methods of stimulation were compared in six patients; in four out of six conditional neuromodulation resulted in a higher mean bladder capacity than continuous, but the difference was not significant.Conclusions: Both conditional and continuous stimulation significantly increase bladder capacity. The conditional mode is probably at least as effective as the continuous, suggesting that it could be used in an implanted device for bladder suppression.Spinal Cord (2001) 39, 420–428.

[1]  S. Lindström,et al.  The neurophysiological basis of bladder inhibition in response to intravaginal electrical stimulation. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[2]  J. Bosch,et al.  Neuromodulation: urodynamic effects of sacral (S3) spinal nerve stimulation in patients with detrusor instability or detrusor hyperflexia , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  T Sinkjaer,et al.  Detection and inhibition of hyperreflexia‐like bladder contractions in the cat by sacral nerve root recording and electrical stimulation , 2001, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[4]  P. Navarra,et al.  Intravesical electromotive administration of oxybutynin in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia unresponsive to standard anticholinergic regimens. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Bladder motility and efferent nerve activity during isotonic and isovolumic recording in the cat , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  J. L. Vanhee,et al.  Short-term effect of pudendal nerve electrical stimulation on detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injury patients: importance of current strength , 1996, Paraplegia.

[7]  M. Fall,et al.  The effect of intravaginal electrical stimulation on the feline urethra and urinary bladder. Electrical parameters. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum.

[8]  C. Carlsson,et al.  Detrusor inhibition induced from mechanical stimulation of the anal region and from electrical stimulation of pudendal nerve afferents. An experimental study in cats. , 1974, Investigative urology.

[9]  Jg Prévinaire,et al.  Is there a place for pudendal nerve maximal electrical stimulation for the treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injury patients? , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[10]  S. Lindström,et al.  The effect of intravanginal electrical stimulation on the feline urethra and urinary bladder. Neuronal mechanisms. , 1977, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Supplementum.

[11]  Y Handa,et al.  A new technique for sacral nerve stimulation: a percutaneous method for urinary incontinence caused by spinal cord injury. , 1998, British journal of urology.

[12]  P. Rosier,et al.  Bladder compliance after posterior sacral root rhizotomies and anterior sacral root stimulation. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[13]  A. Kondo,et al.  Suppression of bladder instability by penile squeeze. , 1982, British journal of urology.

[14]  Electroneurographic (ENG) signals from intradural S3 dorsal sacral nerve roots in a patient with a suprasacral spinal cord injury , 2000 .

[15]  J S Walter,et al.  Bladder inhibition by penile nerve stimulation in spinal cord injury patients. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[16]  B. Bussel,et al.  Urodynamic monitoring during percutaneous sacral nerve neurostimulation in patients with neurogenic detrusor hyperreflexia , 2001, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[17]  M. Craggs,et al.  Acute suppression of idiopathic detrusor instability with magnetic stimulation of the sacral nerve roots. , 1997, British journal of urology.

[18]  M. Fall,et al.  Effects of external and direct pudendal nerve maximal electrical stimulation in the treatment of the uninhibited overactive bladder. , 1989, British journal of urology.

[19]  C. Godec,et al.  Acute electrical stimulation for urinary incontinence. , 1978, Urology.

[20]  M Craggs,et al.  Neuromodulation of the lower urinary tract , 1998, Experimental physiology.

[21]  M. Nakamura,et al.  Bladder inhibition by penile electrical stimulation. , 1984, British journal of urology.

[22]  J. R. Ruud Bosch,et al.  Long-term results of sacral nerve stimulation (S3) for the treatment of neurogenic refractory urge incontinence related to detrusor hyperreflexia. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[23]  A. Hendrikx,et al.  B-mode and colour-flow duplex ultrasonography: a useful adjunct in diagnosing scrotal diseases? , 1997, British journal of urology.

[24]  R. Vereecken,et al.  Electrical sphincter stimulation in the treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia of paraplegics , 1987 .

[25]  M D Craggs,et al.  Neuromodulation of detrusor hyper-reflexia by functional magnetic stimulation of the sacral roots. , 1996, British journal of urology.

[26]  Philippe Hanson,et al.  Skin potential recordings during cystometry in spinal cord injured patients , 1993, Paraplegia.

[27]  T Sinkjaer,et al.  Analysis of bladder related nerve cuff electrode recordings from preganglionic pelvic nerve and sacral roots in pigs. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[28]  S. Plevnik,et al.  Urethral and bladder responses to anal electrical stimulation. , 1979, The Journal of urology.

[29]  M. Ruutu,et al.  Maximal electrical stimulation in the treatment of unstable detrusor and urge incontinence. , 1990, European urology.

[30]  S. Lindström,et al.  Electrical stimulation. A physiologic approach to the treatment of urinary incontinence. , 1991, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[31]  D. Vodušek,et al.  Detrusor inhibition induced by stimulation of pudendal nerve afferents , 1986 .