Mechanical response of dense pedestrian crowds to the crossing of intruders

The increasing number of mass events involving large crowds calls for a better understanding of the dynamics of dense crowds. Inquiring into the possibility of a mechanical description of these dynamics, we experimentally study the crossing of dense static crowds by a cylindrical intruder, a mechanical test which is classical for granular matter. The analysis of our experiments reveals robust features in the crowds’ response, comprising both similarities and discrepancies with the response of granular media. Common features include the presence of a depleted region behind the intruder and the short-range character of the perturbation. On the other hand, unlike grains, pedestrians anticipate the intruder’s passage by moving much before contact and their displacements are mostly lateral, hence not aligned with the forces exerted by the intruder. Similar conclusions are reached when the intruder is not a cylinder, but a single crossing pedestrian. Thus, our work shows that pedestrian interactions even at high densities (3 to 6 ped/m2) do not reduce to mechanical ones. More generally, the avoidance strategies evidenced by our findings question the incautious use of force models for dense crowds.

[1]  Roger L. Hughes,et al.  Towards a mathematical model for stability in pedestrian flows , 2011, Networks Heterog. Media.

[2]  Alexandre Nicolas,et al.  Pedestrian flows through a narrow doorway: Effect of individual behaviours on the global flow and microscopic dynamics , 2016 .

[3]  Clustering and flow around a sphere moving into a grain cloud , 2016, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[4]  Stefan Holl,et al.  Influences of Extraction Techniques on the Quality of Measured Quantities of Pedestrian Characteristics , 2016 .

[5]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Similarities Between Granular and Traffic Flow , 1998 .

[6]  Jian Ma,et al.  New insights into turbulent pedestrian movement pattern in crowd-quakes , 2013 .

[7]  Denis Bartolo,et al.  Dynamic response and hydrodynamics of polarized crowds , 2019, Science.

[8]  Active microrheology in active matter systems: Mobility, intermittency, and avalanches. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Angel Garcimartín,et al.  Flow of pedestrians through narrow doors with different competitiveness , 2016 .

[10]  R. Candelier,et al.  Creep motion of an intruder within a granular glass close to jamming. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[11]  Walter F. Stenning,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 2003 .

[12]  J. L. Berrou,et al.  Calibration and validation of the Legion simulation model using empirical data , 2007 .

[13]  Philippe Peyla,et al.  How to push one's way through a dense crowd , 2018 .

[14]  John J. Fruin,et al.  Pedestrian planning and design , 1971 .

[15]  A. Seguin,et al.  Dense granular flow around a penetrating object: experiment and hydrodynamic model. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[16]  Roger I. Tanner Stokes paradox for power-law flow around a cylinder , 1993 .

[17]  M B Hastings,et al.  Multiscaling at Point J: jamming is a critical phenomenon. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[18]  Alexandre Nicolas,et al.  Experimental Study of Collective Pedestrian Dynamics , 2018, Collective Dynamics.

[19]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Sylvain Faure,et al.  Crowd motion from the granular standpoint , 2015 .

[21]  Saul Kaplun,et al.  Low Reynolds Number Flow Past a Circular Cylinder , 1957 .

[22]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  Verification of a Pedestrian Simulation Tool Using the NIST Recommended Test Cases , 2014 .

[23]  E. Kolb,et al.  Flow fields around an intruder immersed in a 2D dense granular layer , 2014 .

[24]  A. Seguin,et al.  Experimental velocity fields and forces for a cylinder penetrating into a granular medium. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[26]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Crowd behaviour and motion: Empirical methods , 2018 .

[27]  Mohamed H. Dridi Pedestrian flow simulation validation and verification techniques , 2014, 1410.0603.

[28]  Christian Bauckhage,et al.  Loveparade 2010: Automatic video analysis of a crowd disaster , 2012, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[29]  E. Kolb,et al.  Rigid intruder inside a two-dimensional dense granular flow: Drag force and cavity formation , 2013 .

[30]  K. Karimi,et al.  Elasticity of frictionless particles near jamming. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Applying Microscopic Pedestrian Flow Simulation to Railway Station Design Evaluation in Lisbon, Portugal , 2004 .

[32]  Angel Garcimartín,et al.  Experimental proof of faster-is-slower in systems of frictional particles flowing through constrictions. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  Ignacio Pagonabarraga,et al.  Clogging transition of many-particle systems flowing through bottlenecks , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Esther Duflo,et al.  Empirical Methods , 2019, Research Handbook on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law.