A conceptual framework for understanding behavioral responses to HIREC

Although animals vary substantially in their behavioral responses to human-induced rapid environmental change (HIREC), we are only beginning to develop theory to explain this variation. Signal detection theory predicts variation in responses to novel dangerous organisms (exotic predators or toxic prey) or exotic organisms that are safe but might appear dangerous (e.g. ecotourists). Models of dispersal and habitat use explain variation in ability to cope with habitat change (loss, fragmentation). Many models assume that organisms use one main cue axis to evaluate options. New models are needed to account for the use of multiple cues. A general framework that treats genes as cues that set a ‘prior’ that can be updated by experiences predicts genetic versus plastic responses to HIREC.

[1]  Daniel T Blumstein,et al.  How Nature-Based Tourism Might Increase Prey Vulnerability to Predators. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  M. Larsson,et al.  'Do you remember the first time?' Host plant preference in a moth is modulated by experiences during larval feeding and adult mating. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[3]  Anne Charmantier,et al.  Climate change and timing of avian breeding and migration: evolutionary versus plastic changes , 2013, Evolutionary applications.

[4]  A. Dawson Control of the annual cycle in birds: endocrine constraints and plasticity in response to ecological variability , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  The life-history basis of behavioural innovations , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Z. Barta,et al.  Instantaneous song modification in response to fluctuating traffic noise in the tree cricket Oecanthus pellucens , 2016, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Amanda E. Martin,et al.  Matrix quality and disturbance frequency drive evolution of species behavior at habitat boundaries , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[8]  B. B. M. Wong,et al.  Behavioral responses to changing environments , 2015 .

[9]  John M. McNamara,et al.  Information is a fitness enhancing resource , 2010 .

[10]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Genes as cues: phenotypic integration of genetic and epigenetic information from a Darwinian perspective. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Ulrika Candolin,et al.  Behavioural responses to human‐induced environmental change , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[12]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Optimal assessment of multiple cues , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  A. Sih Prey Uncertainty and the Balancing of Antipredator and Feeding Needs , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Andrew P Hendry,et al.  Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence , 2014, Evolutionary applications.

[15]  J. McNamara,et al.  The Evolution of Transgenerational Integration of Information in Heterogeneous Environments , 2015, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Bruce A. Robertson,et al.  Ecological novelty and the emergence of evolutionary traps. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  D. Macdonald,et al.  The devil is in the dispersers: predictions of landscape connectivity change with demography , 2014 .

[18]  P. Banks,et al.  Naïveté in novel ecological interactions: lessons from theory and experimental evidence , 2014, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[19]  J. Fick,et al.  Dilute Concentrations of a Psychiatric Drug Alter Behavior of Fish from Natural Populations , 2013, Science.

[20]  P. Banks,et al.  Negotiating multiple cues of predation risk in a landscape of fear: what scares free-ranging brushtail possums? , 2014 .

[21]  Greta Bocedi,et al.  Models of Dispersal Evolution Highlight Several Important Issues in Evolutionary and Ecological Modeling , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[22]  S. Swearer,et al.  REVIEW: Identifying, preventing and mitigating ecological traps to improve the management of urban aquatic ecosystems , 2015 .

[23]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Contextual influences on animal decision-making: Significance for behavior-based wildlife conservation and management. , 2017, Integrative zoology.

[24]  D. Rhind,et al.  Invasive toads shift predator-prey densities in animal communities by removing top predators. , 2015, Ecology.

[25]  Hans Van Dyck,et al.  Modelling dispersal: an eco‐evolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behaviour and the multiple costs involved , 2012 .

[26]  W. Frankenhuis,et al.  Bayesian Models of Development. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  O. Leimar,et al.  The evolution of dispersal – the importance of information about population density and habitat characteristics , 2009 .

[28]  V. Savage,et al.  Temperature dependence of trophic interactions are driven by asymmetry of species responses and foraging strategy. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[29]  B. B. M. Wong,et al.  Behavioural Responses to a Changing World: Mechanisms and Consequences , 2012 .

[30]  N. Clayton,et al.  Comparative cognition for conservationists , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes , 2007 .

[32]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[33]  Seppo Rytkönen,et al.  The relevance of food peak architecture in trophic interactions , 2016, Global change biology.

[34]  Tricia L. Rubi,et al.  Should receivers follow multiple signal components? An economic perspective , 2016 .

[35]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Fisheries-induced evolution , 2015 .

[36]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  SEARCH COSTS AND HABITAT SELECTION BY DISPERSERS , 2005 .

[37]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  Combining Information from Ancestors and Personal Experiences to Predict Individual Differences in Developmental Trajectories , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[38]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Multisensory perception in uncertain environments , 2012 .

[39]  M. C. Ferrari,et al.  Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change , 2011, Evolutionary applications.

[40]  L. A. Whittingham,et al.  Multimodal sexual selection in a warbler: plumage and song are related to different fitness components , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  Pete C. Trimmer,et al.  The evolution of decision rules in complex environments , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  C. Baskin,et al.  Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and, Evolution of Dormancy and Germination , 1998 .

[43]  J. Krebs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT , 1988 .

[44]  A. Sih,et al.  Predicting novel herbivore–plant interactions , 2013 .

[45]  J. Bro-Jørgensen Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  S. Finnegan,et al.  Climate Change and the Past, Present, and Future of Biotic Interactions , 2013, Science.

[47]  D. Elias,et al.  Female preference for multi-modal courtship: multiple signals are important for male mating success in peacock spiders , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  A. Sih Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  R. Watson,et al.  Species traits and climate velocity explain geographic range shifts in an ocean-warming hotspot. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[50]  John L. Orrock,et al.  Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions , 2010 .

[51]  T. Sherratt,et al.  Optimal sampling and signal detection: unifying models of attention and speed–accuracy trade-offs , 2013 .

[52]  A. Hendry,et al.  Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations , 2008, Molecular ecology.