Stereoscopic Viewing and Reported Perceived Immersion and Symptoms

Purpose. Stereoscopic 3D displays heighten perceived immersion but elevate viewing symptoms for some viewers. The present study measured prevalence and magnitude of perceived immersion and viewing symptoms in stereoscopic viewing, and related them to viewer's characteristics and viewing position. Methods. Two hundred three teens and adults viewed a movie in 2D or 3D while sitting at different angles and distances. Their prior viewing symptoms, as well as visual and physical discomfort immediately before and after viewing, were measured with questionnaires. They were also asked to report their perceived immersion after the viewing. Results. Twelve percent and twenty-one percent of 2D and stereoscopic 3D participants reported increases of measured symptoms during and/or after viewing. Stereoscopic 3D viewing incurred greater and more frequent perception of blurred vision, double vision, dizziness, disorientation, and nausea than 2D viewing. Reported ocular and physical symptoms were negatively correlated to perceived immersion in 3D viewing. Older viewers (age 46 years or older) reported greater ocular, visual, and motion sickness symptoms in 2D viewing, and younger viewers (age 24–34 years) reported greater visual and motion sickness symptoms in 3D viewing. Sitting in an oblique position attenuated perceived immersion but also reduced motion symptoms in 3D viewing. Prior viewing symptoms in 2D tasks also predicted ocular and physical symptoms in 2D but less so in 3D viewing. Conclusions. Stereoscopic 3D viewing provides greater immersion, but it can also lead to heightened visual and motion sickness symptoms. Viewers with prior symptoms in viewing TV and computer screen are not more likely to have increased ocular and physical symptoms in 3D viewing. Young viewers incurred higher immersion but also greater visual and motion sickness symptoms in 3D viewing; both will be reduced if a farther distance and a wider viewing angle are adopted.

[1]  E F FINCHAM,et al.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Filippo Speranza,et al.  Effect of disparity and motion on visual comfort of stereoscopic images , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Peter Janssen,et al.  Extracting 3D structure from disparity , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  J. Sheedy,et al.  EXOPHORIA AT NEAR IN PRESBYOPIA* , 1975, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[5]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[6]  Dennis Proffitt,et al.  Quantifying immersion in virtual reality , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[7]  Masaki Emoto,et al.  Changes in fusional vergence limit and its hysteresis after viewing stereoscopic TV , 2004 .

[8]  Mtm Marc Lambooij,et al.  Visual Discomfort and Visual Fatigue of Stereoscopic Displays: A Review , 2009 .

[9]  H Ohzu,et al.  Accommodative responses to stereoscopic three-dimensional display. , 1997, Applied optics.

[10]  Frederick P. Brooks What's Real About Virtual Reality? , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[11]  W. Grove Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[12]  F. C. Donders,et al.  On the Anomalies of Accommodation and Refraction of the Eye, with a Preliminary Essay on Physiological Dioptrics , 1864, The British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review.

[13]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  A stereoscopic view of visual processing streams , 1990, Vision Research.

[14]  Paul D. Gamlin Subcortical neural circuits for ocular accommodation and vergence in primates , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics.

[15]  C. Schor,et al.  A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence: simulations of step and frequency responses. , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  Bart Farell,et al.  Seeing motion in depth using inter-ocular velocity differences , 2005, Vision Research.

[17]  F. A. Miles Binocular Vision and Stereopsis by Ian P. Howard and Brian J. Rogers, Oxford University Press, 1995. £90.00 (736 pages) ISBN 0 19 508476 4. , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Cooperative neural processes involved in stereoscopic acuity , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  James E. Sheedy,et al.  The Effects of Visual Display Distance on Eye Accommodation, Head Posture, and Vision and Neck Symptoms , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[20]  B G Cumming,et al.  Disparity-induced and blur-induced convergence eye movement and accommodation in the monkey. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Convergence and Accommodation , 1984 .

[22]  P. Costello Health and Safety Issues associated with Virtual Reality-A Review of Current Literature , 1997 .

[23]  J. Sheedy,et al.  Is all Asthenopia the Same? , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[24]  Nassir Navab,et al.  The effect of out-of-focus blur on visual discomfort when using stereo displays , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[25]  Shunnan Yang,et al.  Effects of vergence and accommodative responses on viewer's comfort in viewing 3D stimuli , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[26]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[27]  Jari Takatalo,et al.  Simulator sickness in virtual display gaming: a comparison of stereoscopic and non-stereoscopic situations , 2006, Mobile HCI.

[28]  David M. Hoffman,et al.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[29]  J. Sheedy,et al.  Computer Use, Symptoms, and Quality of Life , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Speed discrimination of motion-in-depth using binocular cues , 1995, Vision Research.

[31]  A Duane,et al.  Studies in Monocular and Binocular Accommodation, with Their Clinical Application. , 1922, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[32]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Perceptual attributes of crosstalk in 3D images , 2005, Displays.